Case law

Dyer v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

392 A.2d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 1978

Marshall v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C. App., 377 A.2d 429 (1977). If the Board’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence they are conclusive. Washington Post v. … District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 379 A.2d 694 (1977).

Schwarzman v. National Transportation Safety Board

398 F. App'x 608 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 25, 2010

This petition for review was considered on the record from the National Transportation Safety Board (“NTSB”) and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. CIR. R. 34®.

Boston & Maine Corp. v. National Mediation Board

669 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 1987

The situations in which a district court ought to order the National Mediation Board to appoint a mediator are admittedly few. 1 See International Ass’n of Mach. & *2 A. Wkrs. v. National Med. … and Hudson R.R. v.

BNSF Railway Co. v. Surface Transportation Board

526 F.3d 770 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 2008

Co. v. ICC, 985 F.2d 589, 596 (D.C. Cir. 1993). The Board’s rulemaking changed various aspects of the Stand-Alone-Cost test. … Power, Inc. v. FERC, 493 F.3d 239, 260 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Nuvio Corp. v. FCC, 473 F.3d 302, 306 (D.C.

Berger v. BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGIST EXAMINERS FOR DC

313 A.2d 602 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 1973

The Board argues that petitioner cannot raise these questions here, that he is barred by the principle “that one cannot in the same proceeding both assail a statute and rely upon it.” Buck v. … Court in Public Utilities Commission of Cal. v.

District Unemployment Compensation Board v. Security Storage Co.

365 A.2d 785 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1976

Von Stauffenberg v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 269 A.2d 110, 111 (1970), aff’d. 148 U.S.App.D.C. 104 , 107, 459 F.2d 1128 , 1131 (1972). … [Wieck v. Sterenbuch, D.C.App., 350 A.2d 384, 387 (1976).] 2 . These principles were applied in Perry v.

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

774 F.3d 25 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 2014

The Board agreed, finding that CSX had raised “considerable doubts as to the shipper’s ability to satisfy the Board’s market dominance standard.” Total Petrochemicals USA, Inc. v. CSX Transp., Inc., No. … As the Court noted in FTC v.

Hill v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

281 A.2d 433 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 1971

PAIR, Associate Judge: When this cause was here before, Hill v. … In any event no such transcript has been brought here. 1 The findings of fact do not, therefore, provide a proper base for the conclusions which the Board has drawn therefrom. Allentuck v.

Baltierra v. West Virginia Board of Medicine

253 F. Supp. 2d 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2003

See, e.g., Crane v. Carr, 814 F.2d 758, 761-62 (D.C.Cir.1987); World Wide Minerals, Ltd. v. Republic of Kazakhstahn, 116 *14 F.Supp.2d 98, 105-06 (D.D.C.2000); Mallinckrodt Medical, Inc. v. … Inst. v. United States, 550 F.Supp. 1213, 1216-17 (D.D.C.1982); Envtl. Research Int’l, Inc. v. Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc., 355 A.2d 808 (D.C.1976) (en banc).

Charles Luck v. D.C. Parole Board

996 F.2d 372 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 25, 1993

Luck v. Chairman, D.C. Parole Board, No. 90-0775, mem. op., 1990 WL 179928 (D.D.C. Oct. 30, 1990). … Williamson v.

Stone v. Board of Examiners & Registrars of Architects

126 A.2d 157 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1956

In Kemp v. … As to the applicability of a statute of limitations to proceedings of this kind see: State Medical Examining Board v. Stewart, 46 Wash. 79 , 89 P. 475 , 11 L.R.A..N.S., 557; State Bar Commission ex rel. Williams v.

Marilyn M. Fisher v. The Renegotlation Board

473 F.2d 109 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 10, 1972

In granting the Board’s motion for summary judgment, though no reasons were stated, the District Court apparently relied upon Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation Board, 138 U.S. … For a more detailed explanation of the operations of the Board we refer to the recent decision of this court in Bannercraft Clothing Company, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board, 151 U.S.App.D.C. 174 , 466 F.2d 345 (1972). 3 .

Brown v. Gesellschaft Fur Drahtlose Telegraphie, M. B. H.

104 F.2d 227 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 13, 1939

H. v. Brown, 64 App.D.C. 357 , 78 F.2d 410 , certiorari denied 296 U.S. 618 , 56 S.Ct. 139 , 80 L.Ed. 439 . 2 Davis v. … Brown, 64 App.D.C. 357, 362 , 78 F.2d 410, 415 , certiorari denied 296 U.S. 618 , 56 S.Ct. 139 , 80 L.Ed. 439 . See Steele v.

Cohen v. Board of Trustees of the University

819 F.3d 476 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 2016

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, C/O CHAIR, DR. … Superior Court against the Board of Trustees and three university officials alleging, among other things, a violation of his procedural due process rights under the U.S. Constitution.

Midwest Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

564 F.2d 434 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1977

We are to sustain the Board’s determinations if they are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S 278, 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); Universal Camera Corp. v. … NLRB v. Brown, supra, 380 U.S. at 287 , 85 S.Ct. 980 ; Mueller Brass Co. v. NLRB, supra, 544 F.2d at 819 .

Chritton v. National Transportation Safety Board

888 F.2d 854 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 1989

E.g., Administrator v. … Administrator v. Austin, 2 N.T.S.B. at 663-664. The Board also correctly concluded that “[Mr.

BNSF Railway Co. v. Surface Transportation Board

453 F.3d 473 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 2006

The Board’s concern with due process for shippers may be well-founded. See Logan v. … Power Agency v.

Blackmon-Malloy v. United States Capitol Police Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2024

Wilhelmina Pope v. The Railroad Retirement Board Edwin Thrash v. The Railroad Retirement Board

744 F.2d 868 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 2, 1984

Pope v. U.S. Railroad Retirement Board, and Thrash v. U.S. Railroad Retirement Board, 672 F.2d 972 (D.C.Cir.1982). We see no need to repeat them. … Pope v. Railroad Retirement Board, 672 F.2d 972, 975 (D.C.Cir.1982).

Pacific Maritime Association v. National Labor Relations Board

905 F. Supp. 2d 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 2012

(the “Board”) against the IBEW. … LC v. Lichtenstein, 441 F.