Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.99s
Hart v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
57 N.J.L. 90 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1894
Justice Garrison, in his •opinion in Waters v. Newark, 28 Atl. … Jersey City v. Kiernan, 21 Vroom 246 . The exemption of municipal corporations from liability to ■such actions has been put by our courts on the ground of ancient precedent and public policy. Livermore v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedJOHN P. BROWN v. PATRICIA BROWN (L-2367-20, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 2022
APPELLATE DIVISION v. … That is, as the Court recognized in Hawkins v. Harris, 141 N.J. 207, 216 (1995), and later in Loigman v. Twp.
Cited 0 timesPublished318 N.J. Super. 512 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 1999
See State v. … of Education directing the local board to give its reasons to the teacher); State v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedState v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
53 N.J.L. 585 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1891
and pay of the board. … Aside from the provisions ' of the above act, there exists no reason to doubt the ability of the board to do so. Adams v. Haines, 19 Vroom 25 ; Greene v. Freeholders of Hudson, 15 Id. 388.
Cited 15 timesPublishedState v. Board of Public Works
56 N.J.L. 431 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1894
The form in which the determination of the board is expressed is no test, for acts performed by means of an ordinance may be either legislative or judicial. City of Camden v. Mulford, 2 Dutcher 49 ; State, Vanatta, v. … Reynolds, v. Board of Commissioners of Tippecanoe, 45 Ind. 501 ; Dufford v. Nolan, 17 Vroom 87 . Now, I think that the act of the board of public works in adopting the ordinance in the present case was judicial.
Cited 32 timesPublished28 N.J. Super. 315 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 1953
See State v. E. I. DuPont deNemours Powder Co., 79 N. J. Eq. 31 (Ch. 1911) ; State v. Mundel Cork Corp., 126 N. J. Eq. 100 (Ch. 1939) ; and City of Newark v. Charles Realty Co., 9 N. J. Super. 442, 462 (Law Div. 1950). … See Board of Health v. Eastlack, 68 N. J. L. 585 (Sup. Ct. 1902) ; Ingwersen v. Rankin, 47 N. J. L. 18 (Sup. Ct. 1885), affirmed 49 N. J. L. 481 (E. & A. 1887). See Ahern v. Steele, 115 N. Y. 203 , 22 N.
Cited 1 timesPublished94 N.J.L. 187 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 1, 1920
Kenny & Company, which had entered into a contract with the board of education of Morristown, in the county of Morris, to provide all the materials and to do- and perform all the work required in the general construction … The trial court apparently misunderstood the effect of the opinion of Justice Swayze for this court in Wildwood Board of Education v. Bright et al., reported in 91 N. J.
Cited 1 timesPublished323 N.J. Super. 100 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 1999
grounds, relying upon Steinmann v. … As Justice Schreiber wrote for the Court in Young v.
Reversed on other grounds by James v. Bd. of Trustees of PERS, 164 N.J. 396 (2000)Cited 2 timesPublishedHarel v. Rutgers, State University
5 F. Supp. 2d 246 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 24, 1998
See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … See Brown v. General Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976).
Cited 29 timesPublishedBoard of Chosen Freeholders v. Hough
55 N.J.L. 628 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1893
The board was bound by the action of its committee. City of Burlington v. Dennison, 13 Vroom 165 . … Roundtree, v. Board of Commissioners of Gibson County, 80 Ind. 478 . See, also, Ell. Roads and S. (ed. 1890), p. 23, and cases there cited.
Cited 4 timesPublished272 N.J. Super. 373 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 1994
See Chardon v. … .); Delaware State College v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPlunkett v. Board of Pension Commissioners
113 N.J.L. 230 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 24, 1934
The applicant invokes the jurisdiction of this court to review, by certiorari, a resolution of the Board of Pension Commissioners of the city of Hoboken, denying his petition for a pension from the fund created under the … Bennett v. Lee, 104 N. J. L. 453. Until the particular event should happen upon which the money, or a part of it, was to be paid, there was no vested right in the member to such payment. Pennie v. Reis, 132 U.
Cited 29 timesPublishedBoard of Chosen Freeholders v. Kaiser
75 N.J.L. 9 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 2, 1908
Virtue v. Freeholders of Essex, 38 Vroom 139 . … This court had occasion, in the case of Watkins v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedPhelps v. State Board of Education
115 N.J.L. 310 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 26, 1935
See Vroom v. Board of Education. 79 N. J. L. 46. We are clear that the legislature could repeal the act of 1909. If it could repeal it, it can modify it as thought best, and that it did by the act of 1933. … The judgments and decisions of the state board under review will be affirmed, with costs.
Cited 11 timesPublishedWilson v. Board of Commissioners
94 N.J.L. 119 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 1, 1920
To sustain this contention he cites the eases of Dufford v. Nolan, 46 N. J. L. 87, and Austin v. Atlantic City, 48 Id. 118. … The case on this point is similar to that of Dufford v. Hoagland, reported sub nom. Dufford v. Nolan, supra (at p. 92).
Cited 2 timesPublishedNew Jersey Wholesale Drug Co. v. Brown
289 F. 108 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 24, 1922
Veeder v. United States, 252 Fed. 414 , 164 C. C. A. 338 . … Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U. S. 385 .”
Cited 4 timesPublishedApplestein v. United Board & Carton Corp.
60 N.J. Super. 333 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 15, 1960
Super. 333 (1960) 159 A.2d 146 BENJAMIN APPLESTEIN, PLAINTIFF, v. UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. MARTHA U. … Co. v.
Cited 42 timesPublished94 N.J. 573 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 6, 1983
Cited 1 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees of Public Employees' Retirement System v. Board of Freeholders
47 N.J. 132 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 2, 1966
The issue is whether the County of Warren is liable for certain contributions demanded by the Board of Trustees of the Public Employees’ Retirement System with respect to a supervisor of official court reporters for Passaic … Super. 187 (Law Div. 1965), and we certified the appeal of the Board of Trustees before the Appellate Division heard it.
Cited 4 timesPublished84 N.J.L. 402 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 3, 1913
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna