Case law

State v. Black

763 A.2d 109 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 12, 2000

State v. Tai, 629 A.2d 594, 595 (Me.1993) (citing State v. Reynolds, 604 A.2d 911, 913 (Me.1992)). … United States v.

Camden & Rockland Water Co. v. Town of Hope

543 A.2d 827 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 30, 1988

Rather, our review is limited to determining whether the Board’s action was arbitrary, not in accord with law, or not supported by substantial evidence in the record. Shackford & Gooch, Inc. v. … See Ullis v. Town of Boothbay Harbor, 459 A.2d 153 (Me. 1983); Schwanda v. Bonney, 418 A.2d 163 (Me. 1980).

International Paper Co. v. Town of Jay

665 A.2d 998 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 6, 1995

IP’s challenge to the board’s authority to regulate air quality contests the board’s jurisdiction to impose penalties at all. See City of South Portland v. … See Lyons v. Board of Directors of School Admin. Dist.

Hathaway v. City of Portland

845 A.2d 1168 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 8, 2004

In Barbara Hathaway v. … Connors v.

Walsh v. City of Brewer

315 A.2d 200 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 5, 1974

See: Packham v. Zoning Board of Review of the City of Cranston, 103 R.I. 467 , 238 A.2d 387 (1968); Gallagher v. Zoning Board of Review of the City of Pawtucket, 95 R.I. 225 , 186 A.2d 325 (1962); Cf. Smedberg et al. v. … Packham v. Zoning Board of Review of the City of Cran-ston, 103 R.I. 467 , 238 A.2d 387 (1968).

Fontaine v. Peddle

144 Me. 214 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 6, 1949

Brown v. Brown, 110 Me. 280 ; 86 A. 32 . Where two actions, however, are brought for the same cause at the same time both actions will be abated upon plea seasonably filed. Garoufalis v. … Brown v. Brown, 110 Me. 280, 284 . The rulings of the presiding justice in the case at bar have legal and sufficient evidence to support them. Exceptions overruled.

CASINO MOTOR COMPANY v. Needham

151 Me. 333 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 23, 1955

Holmes, Warren V. Grindle and Clarence M. Page. Petitioner brought a petition for mandamus against the respondents to compel the issuance of the permit. The alternative writ was issued'. … Webster v.

Burleigh v. Mullen

95 Me. 423 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 26, 1901

The published opinion in Millett v. … He was brother to Brown’s mother and testified, substantially, — that Mr. Loten L.

City of Auburn v. Paul

110 Me. 192 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 30, 1912

In Wandworth Board of Public Works v. Telephone Co., L. R., 13, Q. D., 904, Bowen L. … In Paine v.

Solmitz v. Maine School Administrative District No. 59

495 A.2d 812 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 12, 1985

It is beyond question that “local school boards have broad discretion in the management of school affairs.” Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. … See also National Gay Task Force v.

Rowe v. City of South Portland

730 A.2d 673 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 28, 1999

Forester v. … See Pepperman v.

MacAro v. Town of Windham

468 A.2d 604 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 8, 1983

Our review of the Board’s decision is controlled by 5 M.R.S.A. § 11007(3) and (4) and we do not accord any special deférence to the review conducted in the Superior Court. Gulick v. … Bruk v. Town of Georgetown, 436 A.2d 894, 898 (Me.1981). *606 The evidence of plaintiff’s financial circumstances establishes her inability to contribute to the public charges in 1978.

Fitanides v. Crowley

467 A.2d 168 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 3, 1983

Stucki v. Plavin, 291 A.2d 508, 510 (Me.1972); see Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Bangor, 260 A.2d 434 (Me.1970); see also Waterville Hotel Corp. v. … Cope v. Inhabitants of the Town of Brunswick, 464 A.2d 223, 227 (Me.1983).

Fitanides v. City of Saco

684 A.2d 421 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 30, 1996

Enos v. Town of Stetson, 665 A.2d 678, 680 (Me.1995) (citing Buker v. Town of Sweden, 644 A.2d 1042, 1043 (Me.1994)). … Not counting Spiers’s vote, there were three affirmative votes in favor of the findings of fact made by the Board. See Murach v.

Gerald v. Town of York

589 A.2d 1272 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 17, 1991

Ballard v. City of Westbrook, 502 A.2d 476, 480 (Me.1985). … Seven Islands Land Co. v. Maine Land Use Reg. Comm'n, 450 A.2d 475, 481 (Me.1982).

Valente v. City of Westbrook

543 A.2d 1373 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 5, 1988

Driscoll v. Gheewalla, 441 A.2d 1023, 1026-27 (Me.1982); Cunningham v. Kittery Planning Board, 400 A.2d 1070, 1079 (Me.1979). … See Bayside Enterprises v. Maine Agr. Bargaining Board, 513 A.2d 1355, 1360-61 (Me.1986).

Lincoln v. White

30 Me. 291 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1849

Foster and Benjamin Brown, who conveyed the same premises to Benjamin Lincoln, the ancestor of the demandants, by their deed, bearing date, Feb. 23, 1841. … Smith v. People’s Bank, 24 Maine, 185. Such interest may be conveyed by deed, and before the tenant’s levy, it was transferred to the ancestor of the demandants.

Perreault v. Toussaint

419 A.2d 1009 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 22, 1980

Hathaway v. Rancourt, Me., 409 A.2d 209, 213 (1979); Kinney v. Central Maine Power Co., Me., 403 A.2d 346, 350 (1979); C Company v. City of Westbrook, Me., 269 A.2d 307, 309 (1970). … Hedberg v. Wallingford, Me., 379 A.2d 126, 131 (1977); May v. Labbe, 114 Me. 374, 379 , 96 A. 502, 504 (1916).

Roberts v. Portland Water District

124 Me. 63 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 23, 1924

Riche v. Water Company, 75 Maine, 91; Hamor v. Water Company, 78 Maine, 127; Mosely v. Water Company, 94 Maine, 83; Brown v. Gerald, 100 Maine, 351; Hayford v. Bangor, 102 Maine, 340; Brown v. … Some of these authorities recognize that principle and others support it; Brown v. Water District, supra; Lynch v. Forbes, 161 Mass., 302 ; Minnesota Canal, etc. Co. v. Koochiching Company, (Minn.), 107 N.

Central Maine Power Co. v. Town of Moscow

649 A.2d 320 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 26, 1994

Co. v. … See Spear v. City of Bath, 125 Me. 27, 29-30 , 130 A. 507 (1925); Sweet v. City of Auburn, 134 Me. 28, 33 , 180 A. 803 (1935); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v.