Case law

Howard University Hospital v. D.C. Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 2025

Code § 32-1507(a), (d); Brown v. D.C. Dep’t of Emp. Servs., 83 A.3d 739, 749-50 (D.C. 2014). The ALJ determined that Mr. … Brown, 83 A.3d at 749-50.

National Biodiesel Board v. Environmental Protection Agency

843 F.3d 1010 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 2016

Before: TATEL, BROWN, and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.  2 Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. … King v. Burwell, 135 S. Ct. 2480, 2489 (2015) (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000)).

Bernard Bell v. Harold Brown, Secretary, Department of Defense

557 F.2d 849 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 1977

In Coles v. Penny, 33 a federal employee was advised by the Board that administrative review of his discrimination complaint was complete but was not told that he had a right to sue within 30 days. … Cass withdrew prior to announcement of the Board’s decision. See text supra at notes 16-20 and notes 17, 19 supra; compare Vindigni v. Meyer, 441 F.2d 376 (2d Cir. 1971). We are mindful that Mr. Cass and Mr.

Addo v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD ON NURSING

40 A.3d 17 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 2012

40 A.3d 17 (2012) ADDO v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD ON NURSING. No. 10-AA-1608. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. March 30, 2012. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.

Randy v. Cargill v. John O. Marsh, Jr.

902 F.2d 1006 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1990

Id. at 1511 (quoting Gilligan v. Morgan, 413 U.S. 1, 10 , 93 S.Ct. 2440, 2446 , 37 L.Ed.2d 407 (1973)). … , rather than by proceeding before the Correction Board, is inconsistent with the heightened deference Congress intended the courts to accord determinations of the Correction Board in proceedings under 10 U.S.C. § 1552 (a

Grosdidier v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of Governors

560 F.3d 495 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 2009

KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge: When the Broadcasting Board of Governors denied promotions to three employees, they sued the Board under the Administrative Procedure Act. … Filebark v. Dep’t of Transp., 555 F.3d 1009, 1010 (D.C. Cir. 2009); Fornaro v. James, 416 F.3d 63, 66-67 (D.C. Cir. 2005); Graham v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 931, 933-36 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Carducci v.

Merit Systems Protection Board v. Eastwood

516 F. Supp. 1297 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 1981

See Golden v. Zwickler, 394 U.S. 103, 108-10 , 89 S.Ct. 956, 959-960 , 22 L.Ed.2d 113 (1969); Merced Rosa v. Herrero, 423 F.2d 591, 593 (1st Cir. 1970); Mailer v. Zolotow, 380 F.Supp. 894, 896-97 (S.D.N.Y.1974); C. … See Golden v. Zwickler, 394 U.S. at 109 , 89 S.Ct. at 960 ; International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, Local 37 v.

Blanco v. National Labor Relations Board

641 F. Supp. 415 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1986

See generally NLRB v. A.J. … Squillacote v.

Schwarzman v. National Transportation Safety Board

398 F. App'x 608 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 25, 2010

This petition for review was considered on the record from the National Transportation Safety Board (“NTSB”) and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. CIR. R. 34®.

John J. White, Jr. v. William A. Brown

292 F.2d 725 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1961

See Dunbar v. Steiert, 1927, 31 Ariz. 403 , 253 P. 1113 ; International Harvester Co. of America v. Layton, 1921, 148 Ark. 156 , 229 S.W. 22 ; LeGault v. … Tuckerman v. Mearns, 49 App.D.C. 153 , 262 F. 607 . But we do not find the Tuckerman case or others cited by appellee, Wadhams v. Page, 1890, 1 Wash. 420 , 25 P. 482 and Michelin Tire Co. v.

Stewart v. District of Columbia Armory Board

789 F. Supp. 402 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 1992

Board of Airport Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569, 576 , 107 S.Ct. 2568, 2573 , 96 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987). … Stewart v. District of Columbia Armory Board, 863 F.2d 1013, 1017-18 (D.C.Cir.1988) (quoting City of Los Angeles v. Preferred Communications, 476 U.S. 488, 494 , 106 S.Ct. 2034, 2037 , 90 L.Ed.2d 480 (1986)).

Gesellschaft Fur Drahtlose Telegraphie M. B. H. v. Brown

78 F.2d 410 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 13, 1935

Alfred Frankenthaler and John Wilson Brown III. … Wylie v. Coxe, 15 How. 415 [ 14 L. Ed. 753 ]; Wright v. Tebbitts, 91 U. S. 252 [ 23 L.

Berger v. BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGIST EXAMINERS FOR DC

313 A.2d 602 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 1973

The Board argues that petitioner cannot raise these questions here, that he is barred by the principle “that one cannot in the same proceeding both assail a statute and rely upon it.” Buck v. … Court in Public Utilities Commission of Cal. v.

Kamins v. Board of Elections, District of Columbia

324 A.2d 187 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 1974

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 737 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 1282 n. 8, 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). 3 . … E. g., Storer v. Brown, supra, 415 U.S. at 736, 94 S.Ct. at 1282 ; American Party of Texas v. White, supra, 415 U.S. at 773, 94 S.Ct. at 1302 ; Lubin v.

Schley Brown v. United States

239 F.2d 75 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 26, 1956

239 F.2d 75 Schley BROWN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 13268. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued November 20, 1956. Decided November 29, 1956.

Stone v. Board of Examiners & Registrars of Architects

126 A.2d 157 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1956

In Kemp v. … As to the applicability of a statute of limitations to proceedings of this kind see: State Medical Examining Board v. Stewart, 46 Wash. 79 , 89 P. 475 , 11 L.R.A..N.S., 557; State Bar Commission ex rel. Williams v.

Herbert L. Fenster v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense

617 F.2d 740 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 18, 1979

Cuneo v. Brown, No. 1826-67 (D.D.C. Aug. 7, 1978) (Order Denying Attorneys’ Fees). Appellant Fenster challenges that ruling as an abuse of discretion. II. … Cuneo v. Brown, No. 1826-67 (D.D.C. Aug. 7, 1978) (Order Denying Motion for Attorneys’ Fees). In making this decision, Judge Hart properly exercised the discretion permitted under section 552(a)(4)(E).

Madison v. Cruz

390 F. Supp. 3d 191 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 25, 2019

Copithorne v. … Payton v. Abbott Labs , 386 Mass. 540 , 557, 437 N.E.2d 171 (1982). Defendant points to Schofield v.

Achagzai v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 29, 2020

Before the Court could resolve the Board’s motion, on October 20, 2015, two of the Plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction to prohibit the Board from making certain changes to their work schedules. … Cir. 1993), although, as a general practice, “[r]elief under Rule 60(b)[] motions is rare,” Hall v. CIA, 437 F.3d 94, 99 (D.C. Cir. 2006); see also Kramer v. Gates, 481 F.3d 788, 790 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

Lewis v. National Labor Relations Board

350 F.2d 801 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1965

United Mine Workers v. Pennington, 85 S.Ct. 1585 (June 7, 1965), or (2) require the conclusion that the clause is a “union signatory clause,” District No. 9, Intern. Ass’n of Machinists v. … The Board refused to find compliance since it thought the substitute clause also violated § 8(e). The Board says this decision is not ripe for review. But we express no opinion on that point, see NLRB v.