Case law

Board of Education v. Tait

80 N.J. Eq. 94 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 25, 1912

Subsequent to the decision in Frank v. Freeholders, supra, our legislature passed the Municipal Liens act, and in Arzonico v. Board of Education of West New York, 75 N. J. … As already suggested, this view is not in conflict with Arzonico v. Board of Education, heretofore referred to.

Koschker v. Board of Trustees

233 N.J. Super. 209 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 10, 1989

The board’s determination was neither arbitrary nor unreasonable and was supported by substantial credible evidence in the record. In re Suspension of Heller, 73 N.J. 292 (1977); Campbell v. … Board of Trustees, Police and Bremen’s Retirement System, 233 N.J.Super. 186 (App.Div.1989) and Allen v. Board of Trustees, Police and Firemen's Retirement System, 233 N.J.Super. 197 (App.Div. 1989).

Svendsen v. Board of Review

364 N.J. Super. 202 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 18, 2003

Clowes v. Terminix Intern., Inc., 109 N.J. 575, 588 , 538 A.2d 794 (1988); Zielenski v. … See LoBiondo v.

Gibson v. Board of Education

205 N.J. Super. 48 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 18, 1985

Brown and Brown, 1984 S.L.D. 7 (May 2, 1984), aff’d by the State Board (1984). On April 24 no quorum was present, and consequently no meeting was ever convened and no executive session ever took place. … See, e.g., Bernstein v. Board of Trustees, 151 N.J.Super. 71, 76-77 (App.Div.1977).

Nissman v. Board of Educ.

272 N.J. Super. 373 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 1994

See Chardon v. … .); Delaware State College v.

Hammond v. Board of Aldermen

125 N.J.L. 627 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 28, 1941

Scola v. Board of Education

77 N.J.L. 73 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 9, 1908

In State, Skirm v. City of Trenton, 29 Atl. … Van Reipen v. Jersey City, 29 Vroom 262 -270.

Bodnar v. Board of Health

14 N.J. Misc. 318 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 8, 1936

That section has been specifically construed by the Court of Errors and Appeals in Browne v. Hagen, 91 N. J. L. 544; 104 Atl. Rep. 207 , and Clay v. Browne, 96 N. J. L. 303; 114 Atl. … Those cases, however, seem to leave untouched the findings in Browne v. Hagen, supra, and Clay v.

Gilliland v. Board of Review

298 N.J. Super. 349 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 5, 1997

____” Bd. of Ed. of Tp. of Neptune v. … See Young v. Schering Corp., 141 N.J. 16, 25 , 660 A.2d 1153 (1995); Kletzkin v. Borough of Spotswood Bd. of Ed., supra, 136 N.J. at 278 , 642 A.2d 993 .

Meredith v. Mercer County Board

59 N.J. 530 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 13, 1971

Board of Commissioners of Hoboken v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

108 N.J.L. 195 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 19, 1931

Chaleff v. Board of Trustees

94 N.J. 573 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 6, 1983

Donvito v. Board of Education

387 N.J. Super. 216 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 9, 2006

Watson v. City of E. Orange, 175 N.J. 442 , 815 A.2d 956 (2003). … Donvito, on the other hand, points to the interpretation of these statutes in Spiewak v. Bd. of Ed. of Rutherford, 90 N.J. 63 , 447 A.2d 140 (1982), and Sayreville Educ. Ass’n v.

Allen v. Board of Education

84 N.J.L. 402 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 3, 1913

Roman v. NJ State Parole Board

104 N.J. Super. 222 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 17, 1969

Super. 222 (1969) 249 A.2d 609 JUAN ROMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued December 19, 1968. … That matter depends on the reasons assigned in the revocation of parole alone, see Bonomo v. New Jersey State Parole Board, decided simultaneously herewith.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Buck

51 N.J.L. 155 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1888

Van Riper v. Parsons, 11 Vroom 1 , 123; Rutgers v. New Brunswick, 13 Id. 51; Ziegler v. Gaddis, 15 Id. 363; Anderson v. Trenton, 13 Id. 486. In Anderson v. … Clossen v.

Farrell v. Board of Education

10 N.J. Misc. 88 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 31, 1931

the members of the board. … There is no merit to this contention; and the cases cited by the prosecutor (Montefiore Cemetery Co. v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Newark, 130 Atl. Rep. 730 ; Hudson Telephone Co. v. Jersey City, 49 N. J.

Fromm v. Board of Directors

81 N.J. Super. 138 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 8, 1963

(In this connection, consult State v. Fromm, 65 N. J. … (at page 42) Plaintiff's reliance upon Bedersky v. Policemen’s and Firemen’s Pension Board, above, is misplaced.

Corb v. Board of Health

101 N.J.L. 50 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 26, 1925

In Istvan v. Naar, 84 N. J. L. 113, this court held that the foregoing legislative language, was not sufficient to have the effect of abolishing boards of health organized under the general act of 1887. Comp. … London v. Gilbert, 86 N. J. L. 551; Lang v. Bayonne, 74 Id. 455.

Hay v. Board of Review

282 N.J. Super. 117 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 19, 1995

Nothing in Fischer v. Board of Review, 123 N.J.Super. 263 , 302 A.2d 530 (App.Div.1973), cited by the Board, suggests a contrary result. … We thus reverse and remand the case to the Board of Review for the entry of an order to that effect. Reversed and remanded.