Case law

Brown v. Brown

150 Okla. 217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1931

CLARK, V. C. J. This action was com *218 menced in the district court of Noble county by plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against defendant in error, defendant below.

State v. Hughes

118 Wash. App. 713 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 14, 2003

Brown, 132 Wn.2d at 570-71 ; State v. Lane, 125 Wn.2d 825, 831 , 889 P.2d 929 (1995). … Brown, 132 Wn.2d at 571 .

Brown v. Brown

444 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1969

Brown, filed suit for divorce against the defendant, Ben Brown, on April 7, 1967. Plaintiff alleged, as grounds for the divorce, general indignities. … Lingenfelder v.

Brown v. Brown

8 Wash. App. 528 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 12, 1973

Brown appeals from an order of the trial court reinstating alimony payments in the sum of $500 per month to his former wife. … In so holding, we do not ignore the dicta in Flecken-stein v. Fleckenstein, 59 Wn.2d 131 , 366 P.2d 688 (1961) and Hudson v. Hudson, 8 Wn.2d 114 , 111 P.2d 573 (1941).

Brown v. Brown

77 Va. 619 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Jul 26, 1883

their father down until after the death of their father, the said James Brown, Sr., in the spring of the year 1880; the said Abram Brown never denying, but always admitting, by word and act, that they, the said James Brown … death of their father, the said James Brown, Sr.

Brown v. Brown

723 S.W.2d 93 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 20, 1987

See Williams v. Williams, 349 S.W.2d 422, 424 (Mo.App.1961). … See Nilges v. Nilges, 610 S.W.2d 58, 62 (Mo.App.1980); Williams, 349 S.W.2d at 424 .

Brown v. Brown

42 Minn. 270 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jan 3, 1890

Mary Brown died testate in the year 1884. By her will, she devised to her three sons above named the lot so conveyed to her, share and share alike. … Jur. §§ 468, 517; Gretton v. Haward, 1 Swanst. 409, 433-441, note.

Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. Brown

281 S.W.3d 692 · Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · Apr 30, 2009

Whether the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence is a question of law which we review de novo. Montgomery Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Davis, 34 S.W.3d 559, 562 (Tex.2000); Sanchez v. Tex. State Bd. of Med. … Brown refers us to only one collateral-estoppel case, see Cont’l Can Co. v.

Brown v. Brown

2013 Ohio 2709 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2013

[Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-2709.] … WISE CRB/rad [Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-2709.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR COSHOCTON COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LINDA L.

Carmack v. Trombley

363 F. Supp. 2d 904 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Mar 31, 2005

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 593 (6th Cir.1989). … In Spier v.

Brown v. Brown

302 N.Y. 556 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1951

Brown v. Brown

442 S.W.2d 461 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 30, 1969

Harrington, Tex.Civ.App., 266 S.W. 554 and Graham v. Graham, Tex.Civ.App., 331 S.W.2d 499 (Ref.n. r. e.) In Francis v. … This holding was repeated in Cornell v. Cornell, (Sup.Ct.), 413 S.W.2d 385, 387 . See also Gent v. Gmenier, 435 S.W.2d 293 .

Brown v. Brown

167 Tenn. 567 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1934

Brown, have and recover of the complainant, Mary L. … In Young v.

Brownrigg v. Defrees

196 Cal. 534 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1925

In Tebbets v. … (Crane v. French, 38 Miss. 503 ; Nunn v. Edmiston, 9 Tex. Civ. App. 562 [ 29 S. W. 1115 ] ; Bridges v. Stephens, 132 Mo. 524 [ 34 S. W. 555 ] ; Smith v. Gillette, 59 Tex. 86 ; Young v. Sorenson (Tex. Civ.

Lyons v. United States

18 Cl. Ct. 723 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 22, 1989

See Beckham v. United States, 179 Ct.Cl. 539, 544 , 375 F.2d 782, 785 (1967); Brown v. … The review is nonadversarial in nature (Armstrong v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 754, 764 (1974); Flute v.

Brown v. Brown

21 La. Ann. 461 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jul 15, 1869

Brown, under which the plaintiff claimed title. The plaintiff reserved a bill of exceptions to the ruling of the court in permitting the amendment, but we think the court did not err. … Hughes v. Hamson, 8 N. S. 298; Heirs of Ballie v. Prudhomme, 8 N. S. 338 ; Caldwell v. Fales, 2 La. 130 ; Allain v. Preston, 2 La. 392 and 4 La. 13 ; Knight v. Knight, 12 Ann. 60.

Brown v. Brown

171 N.C. App. 358 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 2005

Montez Brown in the amount of $13,178.48; 2. … Hildebrand v. Vanderbilt, 147 N.C. 640 , 642, 61 S.E. 620, 629 (1908).

Brown v. Brown

6 N.Y. 106 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1851

(Grover v. Coon, 1 N. Y. 536 .) Appeal dismissed, with costs. 1 To the same effect, see Pugsley v. Kisselburgh, 10 N. Y. 420 ; and Wiggins v. Tallmadge, 7 How. Pr. 404 . … See Wait v. Van Allen, 22 N. Y. 319 ; Flora v. Carbean, 38 Ibid. 111.

Brown v. Brown

104 Cal. App. 480 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 1930

Beard, (Seal) “By Florence Brown. … (Fontaine v. Lacassie, 36 Cal. App. 175 [ 171 Pac. 812 ]; Firpo v. Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co., 80 Cal. App. 122 [ 251 Pac. 657 ]; Hillwig v. Boyer, 81 Cal. App. 763 [ 254 Pac. 662 ]; Irvine v.

Brown v. Brown

62 Tex. Civ. App. 308 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 15, 1910

See Anderson v. Carkins, 135 U. S., 483 ( 34 L. Ed., 272 ), reversing the opinion by the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska of contrary effect cited herein in behalf of appellant. See also Rogers v. … King, 102 Texas, 561 ; Witcher v. Wiles, 33 Texas Civ. App., 69 ( 75 S. W., 889 ). We think the present ease, however, distinguishable from those mentioned in that the bond for title upheld in Witcher v.