Case law

Porter v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

281 Or. App. 237 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 21, 2016

The state relies on our decision in Murphy v. … See Atkinson v. Board of Parole, 280 Or App 410, 419 , 382 P3d 567 (2016). The board failed to release petitioner on his scheduled release date.

Laing v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

256 Or. App. 40 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 3, 2013

the Parole Board.” … Cf.Arken v. City of Portland, 351 Or 113, 138-39 , 263 P3d 975 (2011) (explaining that “promissory estoppel against a governmental entity * * * can be applied only in limited circumstances”).

Rios v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

176 Or. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 2001

App. 252 Reynaldo RIOS, Petitioner, v. PSYCHIATRIC SECURITY REVIEW BOARD, Respondent. 84-672; A104844 Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted on Record and Briefs July 23, 2001. Decided August 22, 2001. Harris S. … Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB), upon remand to the Board from the Supreme Court, Rios v.

Wille v. Board of Parole & Post-Prision Supervision

287 Or. App. 709 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 13, 2017

Dixon v. … See Atkinson v.

Knudsen v. Clatsop County Board of Commissioners

45 Or. App. 351 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 24, 1980

Draper v. … Johnson, supra, 274 Or at 23 ; Hewitt v.

Papadopoulos v. State Board of Higher Education

11 Or. App. 621 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 1, 1972

Taggart v. School District No. 1, 96 Or 422 , 188 P 908 , 188 P 1119 (1920).

Afzal v. Public Employees Retirement Board

257 Or. App. 35 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 5, 2013

In Afzal v. … PERB, 239 Or App 284, 293 , 246 P3d 5 (2010) (Afzal I), we reversed and remanded a final order in which the Public Employees Retirement Board (PERB) had denied claimant’s request for a disability retirement allowance on the

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. State Board of Agriculture

198 Or. 43 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1953

The features of that legislation are set forth and analyzed in Savage v. Martin, 161 Or 660 , 91 P2d 273 ; State ex rel. Peterson v. Martin, 180 Or 459 , 176 P2d 636 ; and Sunshine Dairy v. … Sunshine Dairy v. Peterson, supra.

Adams v. Board of Clinical Social Workers

201 Or. App. 500 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 8, 2005

ORS 183.482(8)(a); see Pauly v. Employment Division, 74 Or App 479, 483, 703 P2d 991 (1985). … See ORS 183.450 ("[E]rroneous rulings on evidence shall not preclude agency action on the record unless shown to have substantially prejudiced the rights of a party[.]”); Hoffman Construction Co. v.

Guzman v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON

200 Or. App. 448 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 2005

the board’s failure to afford a timely hearing. … For instance, petitioner could have compelled the board to act by writ of mandamus. ORS 34.110; see also Valleur v.

Shelby v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

140 Or. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 27, 1996

Accord Miller v. … Collins v.

Auckland v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF MULTNOMAH

21 Or. App. 596 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 2, 1975

See, Tierney v. Duris, Pay Less Properties, 21 Or App 613 , 536 P2d 435 (1975). … Dickinson v. Bd. of County Comm., 21 Or App 98 , 533 P2d 1395 (1975).

Marshall v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 1, 2025

STEVE BROWN, et al, Defendants. CLARKE, Magistrate Judge. … United States v. Hempfling, 2008 WL 703809, at *7 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2008), affd, 385 F. App'x 766 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting U G-K Properties v.

Bong v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · May 2, 2025

See Bautista v. … See Kelley v. Rambus, Inc., 384 F.

Damman v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF YAMHILL COUNTY

241 Or. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 2011

Damman, an individual; and Friends of Yamhill County, Inc., an Oregon non-profit corporation, Petitioners-Appellants, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF YAMHILL COUNTY, an Oregon municipal corporation; Charles J. … This case concerns issues similar to those decided in Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of Commissioners, 237 Or.App. 149 , 238 P.3d 1016 (2010), rev. allowed, 349 Or. 602 , 249 P.3d 123 (2011).

Luckey v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

150 Or. App. 480 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 15, 1997

The Board denied relief, and petitioner seeks review. Petitioner relies upon our decision in Bollinger v. Board of Parole, 142 Or App 81 , 920 P2d 1111 , rev allowed 324 Or 394 (1996). … judgment or certain special writ proceedings * * Shelby v.

Atkinson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

280 Or. App. 410 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 31, 2016

See Brumnett v. … In the board’s view, the issue is controlled by our decisions in Rivas v. Persson, 256 Or App 829 , 304 P3d 765 (2013), and Miller v. Board of Parole, 261 Or App 795 , 323 P3d 980 (2014).

Gaynor v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

165 Or. App. 609 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 23, 2000

We review the Board’s order for substantial evidence, errors of law, and abuse of discretion. ORS 144.335(5); ORS 183.482(8); Kessler v. … SAIF v. Shipley, 326 Or 557,561 , 955 P2d 244 (1998). That principle extends to administrative bodies, such as the Board, that perform judicial functions.

Davis v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

341 Or. 442 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 2006

ORS 144.120 directs the board to set an initial release date for most prisoners admitted to the Department of Corrections. See Engweiler v. … See State v.

Tran v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

254 Or. App. 593 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 16, 2013

Wilson v. Tri-Met, 234 Or App 615, 624 , 228 P3d 1225 , rev den, 348 Or 669 (2010); see also Stull v. … .”); see also Patton v.