Case law

Board of Com'rs of Grant County v. Soucek

128 Okla. 151 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1927

The law was afterwards changed and the board of county commissioners allowed to designate the depositories' for the county’s funds, and in State ex rel. v. … X, MASON, V. C. J., and HARRISON LESTER, HUNT, and HEFNER, JX, concur.

Matador Pipelines, Inc. v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

742 P.2d 15 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1987

Cf General Motors v. Okl. Cty. Bd. of Equal. 678 P.2d 233, 236 (Okl.1983), Anderson v. Grand River Dam Authority, 446 P.2d 814, 818 (Okl.1968). The Board possesses only the jurisdiction conferred upon it by statute. … Because the Legislature conferred exclusive jurisdiction upon the Commission, the Board had no authority to assume jurisdiction in the present case. In Pollution Control Coordinating Board v. Okla.

Excise Board of Oklahoma County v. Cooper

183 Okla. 387 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 3, 1938

In Hines v. … Excise Board of Oklahoma County v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 178 Okla. 545 , 61 P.2d 693 , and other cases.

Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine v. Tubbs

307 P.2d 830 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1957

As the court said of the Kentucky State Board of Dental Examiners, with reference to enforcement of the Act regulating the practice of dentistry involved in Kentucky State Board of Dental Examiners v. … J., CORN, V. C. J., and JOHNSON and WILLIAMS, JJ., dissent.

Carrell v. Board of Com'rs of Hughes County

68 Okla. 124 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1918

The proceeding’s in error in this case involve the identical question this day decided in County Commissioners of Pottawatomie County v. Alexander, 68 Okla. 126 , 172 Pac. 436 .

Foster v. Board of Com'rs of Cimarron County

145 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1930

A claim for these amounts was by him presented to1 the board of county commissioners and by them disallowed. An appeal was then taken by him to the district court of said county. … This mortgage, under the holding of this court in State ex rel. v. National Bank of Commerce, 139 Okla. 134 , 281 Pac. 579 , is superior to the right acquired by plaintiff under his tax sale certificate.

State Ex Rel. Fulton v. State Election Board

168 Okla. 446 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1934

As we have said in Meads v. … CULLISON, V. C. .T., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, and BUSBY, JX,' concur. RILEY, O. X, dissents. WELCH, X, absent.

Board of Trustees v. Fishman Realty & Inv. Co.

171 Okla. 351 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

Co. v. … City National Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233 , 253 P. 481 .”

Clark v. Board of Com'rs of Osage County

62 Okla. 7 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1916

to complete their contracts, and requested the board to take charge of and complete the work out of the unpaid part of the contract price, which the board proceeded to do. … Cas. 174; Morgan v. Bust, 100 Ga. 346 , 28 S. E. 419 : Past v. Wolf. 38 Ill. App. 27 ; Wallace v. Lawyer, 54 Ind. 501 , 23 Am. Rep. 661 ; Des Moines Co. v. Hinckley, 62 Iowa, 637 , 17 N. W. 915 ; Webb v.

Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Excise Board

168 Okla. 408 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1934

See Faught v. City of Sapulpa, supra; In re Protest of St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co., 157 Okla. 131 , 11 P. (2d) 189 , and County Excise Board of Creek County v. Gulf Pipe Dine Co., 156 Okla. 103 , 9 P. (2d) 460 . … That identical question was before this court in Excise Board of Creek County v. Gulf Pipe Line Co., supra, and in Protest, of St. Louis S. P. Ry.

Walker v. Board of Com'rs of Grant County

44 Okla. 350 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 1, 1914

Privett et al. v. Board of County Commissioners, post, and the briefs in No. 3909, J. D. Orendorff et al. v. Board of County Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 383 , as the briefs in this *352 cause. … However, it might not be amiss to say that in the cases of Zeigler v. Board of County Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 381 , and Russell v.

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Muskrat

480 P.2d 918 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1971

Muskrat and Mary Beth Taylor, Trustee, d/b/a Economy Wholesale Company, a partnership, filed their application for a wholesaler’s license with the Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. … Board denied the application and on appeal to the District Court, Board’s denial of the license was reversed and it was directed to issue the license. Board lodged this appeal. By constitutional mandate, Art.

Elder v. COUNTY ELECTION BOARD OF CHEROKEE COUNTY

326 P.2d 776 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1958

In our decision in the case of Yocham v. Horn, supra, 'we discussed our former opinions in In re Dunham’s Estate, 181 Okl. 407 , 74 P.2d 117 ; Queenan v. … Writ of mandamus granted requiring respondent board to place petitioner’s name upon ballot as prayed for. WELCH, C. J., and DAVISON, HALLEY, JOFINSON, BLACKBIRD, and JACKSON, JJ., concur. CORN, V. C.

Cummings v. Board of County Commissioners

64 O.B.A.J. 3304 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 3, 1993

Personal Loan & Finance Co. of Capitol Hill v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 437 P.2d 1015 (Okla.1968). … Maule v. Independent School District No. 9, 714 P.2d 198 (Okla.1985).

Shell Petroleum Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

170 Okla. 581 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1935

The rules of law applicable to this situation are: First, a presumption of correctness and fairness in the action of the board (Cooley on Taxation, [4th Ed.] vol. 8, p. 2442; 61 C. J. 611; Southern Surety Co. v. … Carrico v. Crocker, 38 Okla. 440 , 133 P. 181 ; In re McNeal, 35 Okla. 17 , 128 P. 285 .

Martin v. County Election Board of McClain County

206 Okla. 597 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1952

We have approved the action of the State Election Board in refusing to accept filings because the filing tendered was contrary to law in the cases of McCain v. State Election Board, 144 Okla. 85 , 289 P. 759 ; Craig v. … Bond, 160 Okla. 34 , 15 P. 2d 1014 ; and Stafford v. State Election Board, 203 Okla. 132 , 218 P. 2d 617 .

Board of Com'rs of Grant County v. Ernest

45 Okla. 725 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1915

Board of Commissioners v. Wetson, 7 Okla. 174 , 54 Pac. 441 ; Allen v. Board of Commissioners, 28 Okla. 773 , 116 Pac. 175 . … Anderson v. Board of Com’rs, 44 Okla. 164 , 143 Pac. 1145 ; Zeiglar v. Board of Com’rs, 44 Okla. 266 , 144 Pac. 381 ; Orendorff v. Board of Com’rs, 44 Okla. 271 , 144 Pac. 383 ; Huntington et al. v.

Davis v. Board of Commr. of Lincoln County

45 Okla. 284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1913

Gardiner et al. v. City of Blufton, 173 Ind. 454 , 89 N. E. 853 , 90 N. E. 898 , 22 Ann. Cas. 713; Cauldwell et al. v. Curry et al., 93 Ind. 363 ; Caskey v. City of Greensburgh, 78 Ind. 233 ; Jones v. … Rep. 47 ; Brevoort v. City of Brooklyn, 89 N. Y. 128 ; Shattuck et al. v. Bascom, 105 N. Y. 39 , 12 N. E. 283 ; Wheeler et al. v. City of Chicago, 57 Ill. 415 ; Crossett v. Owens et al., 110 Ill. 378 ; Hentig v.

Adams v. Board of Com'rs of Garfield County

35 Okla. 440 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1913

United States v. Wigglesworth, 2 Story, 369 ; Fed. Cas. No. 16,690. In the case of McNally v. Field (C. … .” *444 To the same effect, see Lewis’ Sutherland, Statutory Construction (2d Ed.) sec. 535; Cooley on Taxation (3d Ed.) p. 454, and cases cited; Mayor v. Hartridge, 8 Ga. 30 .

Eckles v. Board of Com'rs of Hughes Co.

112 Okla. 33 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1925

In the second place, plaintiff contends that his claims come under the head of involuntary indebtedness, and cites us the case of Smartt, Sheriff, v. … Also the case of Hume v.