Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

2.98s

  • Doe v. Board on Professional Responsibility

    717 F.2d 1424 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 16, 1983

    See Leis v. Flynt, 439 U.S. 438, 442 , 99 S.Ct. 698, 700 , 58 L.Ed.2d 717 (1979); Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Ass’n, 436 U.S. 447, 460 , 98 S.Ct. 1912, 1920 , 56 L.Ed.2d 444 (1978). … No. 91-358, 84 Stat. 521, 11 D.C.Code §§ 2501-2503; see District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 1303 , 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Simons v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Giri v. National Board of Medical Examiners

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2025

    Although licensing boards can enjoy “complete control over access [to] the regulated professional job market,” “such boards have been routinely held not to be employers.” Johnson v. Greater Se. Cmty. Hosp. … Employing the same logic, courts have held that Title VII does not apply to bar examination boards or to the American Board of Internal Medicine. See Woodard v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brown

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2010

    Moreover, the Browning-Ferris court also ruled that plaintiffs failed to allege any relationship between the pending civil lawsuits and the directors elected to the board during the relevant period of time. Id. at 367. … Defendant Brown’s Motion to Dismiss Count V is therefore denied. 4.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Summerfield, Postmaster General v. Civil Aeronautics Board. Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    207 F.2d 200 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 12, 1953

    As such it was “income” within the meaning which that term has had ever since Doyle v. Mitchell Bros. Co. 7 But our problem is whether it was “revenue” within the meaning of this rate-making statute. … Transcontinental & Western Air v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 1949, 336 U.S. 601 , 69 S.Ct. 756 , 93 L.Ed. 911 . . West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities Comm. (No. 2), 1935, 294 U.S. 79, 82 , 55 S.Ct. 324 , 79 L.Ed. 773 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Jacquelyne L. Neal v. William H. Brown, III

    980 F.2d 747 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1992

    Alton Box Board Co., 609 F.2d 112 , 113 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 1090 , 63 L.Ed.2d 327 (1980); Aberle Hosiery Co. v. American Arbitration Ass’n, 461 F.2d 1005, 1006 (3d Cir.1972); Brough v. … See Rodriguez v. Handy, 802 F.2d 817, 821 (5th Cir.1986); Robert Stigwood Group Ltd. v. Hurwitz, 462 F.2d 910 , 914 & n. 7 (2d Cir.1972); cf. E.P. Hinkel & Co. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Isbrandtsen Co. v. Federal Maritime Board

    159 F. Supp. 884 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 1958

    As was said in Perkins v. … Even if this is true, it would not be outside of the authority of the Board and would not be within the jurisdiction of this Court to enjoin. The decision of the Supreme Court in Larson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kemp v. Board of Medical Supervisors

    46 App. D.C. 173 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1917

    Widrig v. Oyer, 13 Johns. 124 ; Filber v. Dauterman, 26 Wis. 518 ; Bissell v. Cornell, 24 Wend. 354 . … In Halstead v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Haralson v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

    655 F. Supp. 1550 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 1987

    The Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985), case relied on by plaintiffs is inapplicable here. … See Comm’r v. Shapiro, 424 U.S. 614 , 96 S.Ct. 1062 , 47 L.Ed.2d 278 (1976).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Barry v. United States Capitol Guide Board

    636 F. Supp. 2d 95 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 2009

    Dist. v. … .”); Facha v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Green v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

    273 A.2d 479 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 1971

    NEBEKER, Associate Judge: This is a petition from a determination of the District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board). … S.E.C. v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 94-95 , 63 S.Ct. 454 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943). Reversed and remanded. 1 . The Board affirmed the appeals examiner’s findings. 2 . D.C.Code 1967, § 46-310 (b). 3 . Hickenbottom v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 13, 2010

    See Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors, __ F. Supp. 2d __, 2010 WL 2195799 (D.D.C. June 1, 2010); Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors, __ F. Supp. 2d __, 2010 WL 2679893 (D.D.C. July 7, 2010); Sataki v. … See Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors, __ F. Supp. 2d __, 2010 WL 2679893 (D.D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Doherty v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

    283 A.2d 206 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1971

    Nevertheless the leading case in this jurisdiction, Woodward & Lothrop, Inc. v. … See Riley v. District of Col. Unemp. Comp. Bd., D.C.App., 278 A.2d 691 , 692 n. 2 (1971).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Mang v. Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2023

    ) Civil Action No. 23-cv-02283 (TSC) ) MUNICIPAL SECURITIES ) RULEMAKING BOARD, ) … See Vanzant v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., 557 F. Supp. 2d 113, 117 (D.D.C. 2008) (“The WCA is the exclusive remedy for a workplace injury.”) (citing D.C. Code § 32-1504(a)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Almutairi v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of Governors

    928 F. Supp. 2d 219 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2013

    At the time Almutairi applied, Radio Sawa was part of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, “a federal agency responsible for the U.S. … In the Order accompanying this Opinion, the Court will accordingly substitute “Chairman, Broadcasting Board of Governors” for Isaacson in the caption. See Fed. R. Civ.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Compton v. District of Columbia Board of Psychology

    858 A.2d 470 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 2004

    Co. v. … Guzman v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees v. American Federation of State

    130 A.3d 355 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 2016

    Fed. of Teachers, AFL-CIO v. Board of Educ. of the District of Columbia, 109 F.3d 774, 777 (D.C.Cir.1997). … V.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Brown

    845 A.2d 519 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 2004

    Brown represented to the Board that he proposed to take these courses. 8 . … The Board found that Brown has admitted his misconduct in Bar Docket No. 273-91.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1622 v. Brown

    481 F. Supp. 704 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 1979

    For further discussion of these retroactive pay provisions see American Fed’n of Gov't Employees v. Brown, 481 F.Supp. 711, 718-19 (D.D.C. 1979). . … See American Fed’n of Gov’t Employees v. Brown, 481 F.Supp. 711 , 716 n. 6 (D.D.C. 1979).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2010

    Civil Action No. 10-534 (CKK) BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS, et al., Defendants. … See Sataki v. Falahati, Civ. Act.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kamins v. Board of Elections, District of Columbia

    324 A.2d 187 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 1974

    Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 737 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 1282 n. 8, 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). 3 . … E. g., Storer v. Brown, supra, 415 U.S. at 736, 94 S.Ct. at 1282 ; American Party of Texas v. White, supra, 415 U.S. at 773, 94 S.Ct. at 1302 ; Lubin v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.