Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

3.33s

  • Maxwell v. Shivers

    257 Iowa 575 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 9, 1965

    City of Des Moines and Daniels v: Board- of Review, both supra. … Co. v. Board of Review, 176 Iowa 131, 134 , 157 N.W. 731 , 732.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Ballester Hermanos, Inc. v. Campbell Soup Co.

    797 F. Supp. 103 · District Court, D. Puerto Rico · Aug 27, 1992

    Marina Industrial, Inc. v. Brown Boveri Corp., 114 P.R.R. 86 , 91 (1983). … Finally, in G. & J., Inc. v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    8 Wash. App. 528 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 12, 1973

    Brown appeals from an order of the trial court reinstating alimony payments in the sum of $500 per month to his former wife. … In so holding, we do not ignore the dicta in Flecken-stein v. Fleckenstein, 59 Wn.2d 131 , 366 P.2d 688 (1961) and Hudson v. Hudson, 8 Wn.2d 114 , 111 P.2d 573 (1941).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    77 Va. 619 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Jul 26, 1883

    their father down until after the death of their father, the said James Brown, Sr., in the spring of the year 1880; the said Abram Brown never denying, but always admitting, by word and act, that they, the said James Brown … death of their father, the said James Brown, Sr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    723 S.W.2d 93 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 20, 1987

    See Williams v. Williams, 349 S.W.2d 422, 424 (Mo.App.1961). … See Nilges v. Nilges, 610 S.W.2d 58, 62 (Mo.App.1980); Williams, 349 S.W.2d at 424 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lyons v. United States

    18 Cl. Ct. 723 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 22, 1989

    See Beckham v. United States, 179 Ct.Cl. 539, 544 , 375 F.2d 782, 785 (1967); Brown v. … The review is nonadversarial in nature (Armstrong v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 754, 764 (1974); Flute v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    444 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1969

    Brown, filed suit for divorce against the defendant, Ben Brown, on April 7, 1967. Plaintiff alleged, as grounds for the divorce, general indignities. … Lingenfelder v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    2013 Ohio 2709 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2013

    [Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-2709.] … WISE CRB/rad [Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-2709.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR COSHOCTON COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LINDA L.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    42 Minn. 270 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jan 3, 1890

    Mary Brown died testate in the year 1884. By her will, she devised to her three sons above named the lot so conveyed to her, share and share alike. … Jur. §§ 468, 517; Gretton v. Haward, 1 Swanst. 409, 433-441, note.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. Brown

    281 S.W.3d 692 · Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · Apr 30, 2009

    Whether the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence is a question of law which we review de novo. Montgomery Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Davis, 34 S.W.3d 559, 562 (Tex.2000); Sanchez v. Tex. State Bd. of Med. … Brown refers us to only one collateral-estoppel case, see Cont’l Can Co. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    302 N.Y. 556 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1951

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Carmack v. Trombley

    363 F. Supp. 2d 904 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Mar 31, 2005

    Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 593 (6th Cir.1989). … In Spier v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    442 S.W.2d 461 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 30, 1969

    Harrington, Tex.Civ.App., 266 S.W. 554 and Graham v. Graham, Tex.Civ.App., 331 S.W.2d 499 (Ref.n. r. e.) In Francis v. … This holding was repeated in Cornell v. Cornell, (Sup.Ct.), 413 S.W.2d 385, 387 . See also Gent v. Gmenier, 435 S.W.2d 293 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    167 Tenn. 567 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1934

    Brown, have and recover of the complainant, Mary L. … In Young v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    171 N.C. App. 358 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 2005

    Montez Brown in the amount of $13,178.48; 2. … Hildebrand v. Vanderbilt, 147 N.C. 640 , 642, 61 S.E. 620, 629 (1908).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hatfield v. Max Rouse & Sons Northwest

    100 Idaho 840 · Idaho Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1980

    In Crystal Dome Oil & Gas Co. v. … And in Klam v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp., 104 Idaho 897 (1983)Cited 53 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    6 N.Y. 106 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1851

    (Grover v. Coon, 1 N. Y. 536 .) Appeal dismissed, with costs. 1 To the same effect, see Pugsley v. Kisselburgh, 10 N. Y. 420 ; and Wiggins v. Tallmadge, 7 How. Pr. 404 . … See Wait v. Van Allen, 22 N. Y. 319 ; Flora v. Carbean, 38 Ibid. 111.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ronald L. Sanders v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of California State Prison at San Quentin

    373 F.3d 1054 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 8, 2004

    Id. at 470, 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 808 , 862 P.2d 808 (internal quotation marks omitted); see also People v. Brown, 40 Cal.3d 512, 541-45 , 230 Cal.Rptr. 834 , 726 P.2d 516 (1983), reversed on other grounds by California v. … Brown, 479 U.S. 538 , 107 S.Ct. 837 , 93 L.Ed.2d 934 (1987).

    Overruled by Brown v. Sanders, 546 U.S. 212 (2006)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    142 Iowa 125 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 8, 1909

    Farrar v. Farrar, 4 N. H. 191 ( 17 Am. Dec. 410 ); Mussey v. *134 Holt, 24 N. H. 248 ( 55 Am. Dec. 234 ); Howard v. Huffman, 3 Head (Tenn.), 562 ( 75 Am. Dec. 783 ); Huffman v. Huffman, 1 Lea (Tenn.), 491; Peterson v. … (Tenn.) 383; Crossman v. Keister, 223 Ill. 69 ( 79 N. E. 58 , 8 L. R. A. (N. S.) 698, 114 Am. St. Rep. 305 ); Slaughter v. Bernards, 97 Wis. 184 ( 72 N. W. 977 ); Albrecht v. Albrecht, 121 Iowa, 521 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    21 La. Ann. 461 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jul 15, 1869

    Brown, under which the plaintiff claimed title. The plaintiff reserved a bill of exceptions to the ruling of the court in permitting the amendment, but we think the court did not err. … Hughes v. Hamson, 8 N. S. 298; Heirs of Ballie v. Prudhomme, 8 N. S. 338 ; Caldwell v. Fales, 2 La. 130 ; Allain v. Preston, 2 La. 392 and 4 La. 13 ; Knight v. Knight, 12 Ann. 60.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.