Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,304 results
2.33s
Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · Jun 4, 2025
Further, Carbide contends that the Board’s final order was clearly wrong in view of the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence on the record. … It cannot be found that one side’s panel of experts is notably more qualified or more credible than the other.
Cited 0 timesPublished124 W. Va. 550 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1942
The record establishes clearly that there was no occasion for defendant to have paid the indebtedness to Emma Miller for she testified that prior to defendant’s payment of the note, she had neither demanded payment thereof … The record establishes the fact that defendant has placed valuable improvements on the land.
Cited 10 timesPublished84 W. Va. 532 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1919
Their inspection of these letters also qualified them to express opinions as to the genuineness of the signature in question. … Besides, it is clearly revealed by their contents — messages of solicitude, advice and love from mother to daughter.
Cited 13 timesPublishedState of West Virginia v. Timothy M. Conner, II
West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 15, 2021
This Court has established that “[t]he appellate standard of review of questions of law and certified by a circuit court is de novo.” Syl. Pt. 1, Gallapoo v. Wal- Mart Stores, Inc., 197 W. … Both statutes clearly reflect that an overdose event is, by its very nature, emergent and life threatening, demanding immediate medical intervention.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWest Virginia Supreme Court · Feb 16, 2016
Additionally, testimony below established that the children had a significant bond with respondents. … Similarly, petitioner cites to no evidence that establishes respondents are unfit to parent the children.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLargent v. West Virginia Division of Health
192 W. Va. 239 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1994
However, as expressed in the Preamble, supra, the Legislature clearly contemplated a system that recognized and rewarded merit. Thus, within a classification, salaries are subdivided into different pay steps. … of sex by paying wages to employees in such establishment at a rate less than the rate at which he pays wages to employees of the opposite sex in such establishment for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires
Cited 3 timesPublishedIsaac v. Ramsey v. W. Va. Office of Insurance Commissioner/American National Rubber
West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 27, 2013
The Office of Judges held that the preponderance of the evidence did not establish that Mr. … Ramsey has been deemed to have reached medical maximum improvement and failed to qualify for additional treatment as a flare-up since he has not returned to work. On September 1, 2009, Dr. Guberman concluded that Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · Apr 16, 2020
his political association with Skinner was not clearly established at the time of his termination. … Thus, there is a factual dispute about what his job responsibilities included that precludes Austin’s claim for qualified immunity at this stage of the litigation.5 Wilson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWest Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Mike Tencer
West Virginia Supreme Court · Jan 22, 2025
Tencer qualified for Cervical Category IV, allowing for 25-28% WPI, requiring no further adjustment. Regarding apportionment, Dr. Lultschik noted Mr. … The ICA concluded that the Board of Review was not clearly wrong to rely on Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWest Virginia Consolidated Public Retirement Board v. Carter
219 W. Va. 392 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 14, 2006
Va.Code § 5 — 10— 1, et seq.)] the Teachers Retirement System (established in W. Va.Code § 18-7A-1, et seq.)] the Teachers Defined Contribution Retirement System (established by W. … Va.Code § 18-7B-1, et seq.)] the West Virginia State Police Death, Disability and Retirement Fund (established by W. Va.Code § 15-2-1, et seq.)] the West Virginia State Police Retirement System (established by W.
Cited 3 timesPublishedState of West Virginia v. Fritts
West Virginia Supreme Court · Oct 29, 2021
Holz was not “qualified and is not being offered as an expert in GPS.” … For the reasons set forth herein, we find that the circuit court did not clearly abuse that discretion in allowing Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRamaco Resources, Inc. v. Charles Rollins
West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 9, 2021
On appeal to this Court, Ramaco argues that the Board of Review committed clear error because a preponderance of the evidence establishes that Mr. … Rollins responds that simply because he suffered a prior fracture to the same body part does not now immunize Ramaco from responsibility in this claim. And Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublished180 W. Va. 216 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1988
161 W.Va. 750 , 246 S.E.2d 259 (1978): “Where the request is made to take the ultimately designated test under the implied consent law and the licensee by his conduct or words manifests a reluctance to take the test or qualifies … his assent to take the test on factors that are extraneous to the procedures surrounding the test, proof of refusal is sufficiently established.”
Cited 7 timesPublished187 W. Va. 323 · West Virginia Supreme Court · May 15, 1992
Having established the procedure for service of process on a public corporation, we address the service in this case. Here the service was attempted by serving Mr. … His affidavit clearly indicates that he was aware of the legal consequences of the suit.
Cited 21 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · Sep 26, 2024
The Defendants further assert that they are entitled to qualified immunity “because they are alleged to have acted within the scope of their official duties without violating any clearly established constitutional or statutory … Therein, the Plaintiff requests that his case proceed to discovery, and contends that the defense of qualified immunity “is questionable.” Id. at 1, 4.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMonaco v. WV Parkways Authority
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Feb 2, 2021
First, the Electronic Toll Collection Act is clearly implicated here. It is of no consequence that Plaintiff drove through a Cash Only lane when Cash Only is a misnomer. … The Parkways Authority Establishing Act clearly states that the Parkways Authority does not require legislative approval for the charging of tolls or fees for travel over the Turnpike. W. Va.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRoberts Ex Rel. Roberts v. Gale
149 W. Va. 166 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1964
This rule has been qualified to permit negligence to be established by lay witnesses in cases where negligence or want of professional skill is so obvious as to dis *173 pense with the need for expert testimony. … Clearly one can not be negligent for the existence of a condition which he did not undertake to treat.
Cited 80 timesPublishedSkaff v. West Virginia Human Rights Commission
191 W. Va. 161 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1994
"The denial of these rights to properly qualified persons by reason of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, blindness, handicap, or familial status is contrary to the principles of freedom and equality … any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities
Cited 15 timesPublishedQuintrell v. Lincoln County Board of Education
195 W. Va. 347 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1995
The most reasonable way to insure that the most qualified person is found to fill a position is to post a notice of its availability so that all interested and qualified persons may be apprised of it. 179 W.Va. at 205 , 366 … After the five day minimum posting period all vacancies shall be filled within twenty working days from the posting date notice of any job vacancies of established existing or newly created positions.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWest Virginia Supreme Court · Sep 21, 2015
These findings shall not be set aside by a reviewing court unless clearly erroneous. … First and foremost, to qualify as plain error, we must find that error has occurred.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna