Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.84s
Namay v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board
19 Mass. App. Ct. 456 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Mar 8, 1985
Therrien v. Labor Relations Commn., 390 Mass. 644, 647-648 (1983). Gurry v. Board of Pub. Accountancy, 394 Mass. 118, 125-126 (1985). … Cleary v. Cardullo’s, Inc., 347 Mass. 337, 343-344 (1964). School Comm. of Springfield v. Board of Educ., 362 Mass. 417, 441, n.22 (1972). Consolidated Cigar Corp. v. Department of Pub.
Cited 31 timesPublishedState Board of Retirement v. O'Hare
92 Mass. App. Ct. 555 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Dec 15, 2017
This case presents the question whether the State Board of Retirement (board) correctly ordered forfeiture of O'Hare's retirement allowance under G. … State Bd. of Retirement v. Bulger, 446 Mass. 169, 173 (2006), quoting from Massachusetts Bay Transp. Authy. v. Auditor of the Commonwealth, 430 Mass. 783, 790 (2000).
Cited 2 timesPublishedNevins v. Board of Public Welfare
301 Mass. 502 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 29, 1938
It is supplementary to § 43 in accordance with which the board of public welfare removed the petitioner. … McLaughlin v. Mayor of Cambridge, 253 Mass. 193, 199 . Peckham v. Mayor of Fall River, 253 Mass. 590, 593 . Wallace v. Superintendent of Streets of New Bedford, 265 Mass. 338 . Whalen v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedForesta v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board
453 Mass. 669 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 24, 2009
See Houde v. … See Kelley v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedNichols v. Board of Election Commissioners
196 Mass. 410 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 30, 1907
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the board of election commissioners of the city of Boston to provide the so called Australian ballot for use at the next election in Precinct 6 of Ward 10 of that city instead … Elwell v. Comstock, 99 Minn. 261 . Lynch v. Malley, 215 Ill. 574 . Detroit v. Inspectors of Elections, 139 Mich. 548 .
Cited 12 timesPublishedDiMasi v. State Board of Retirement
474 Mass. 194 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 21, 2016
Brown, 466 Mass. 676, 679 (2013) (criminal conviction not final under Massachusetts law until sentence is imposed on defendant); Commonwealth v. Dascalakis, 246 Mass. 12, 19 (1923). … See, e.g., Sliney v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedEverett Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board
6 Mass. L. Rptr. 482 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Oct 24, 1996
This interpretation of §4(2) (c) is not controlled by Gallagher v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board, 4 Mass.App.Ct. 1 (1976), or O’Brien v. … LaBarge v. Chief Administrative Justice of the Trial Court, 402 Mass. 462, 468-69 (1988): Langlitz v. Board of Registration of Chiropractors, 396 Mass. 374, 378 (1985); Holahan v.
Cited 0 timesPublished37 Mass. App. Ct. 217 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Aug 26, 1994
The landlord does not contest, and in his brief implicitly concedes, the right of the board to condition rent entitlement on habitability. See Flynn v. Cambridge, 383 Mass. 152 (1981); Altschuler v. … “(c) If the tenant fails to make payment as ordered, then a Certificate of Eviction shall be issued by the Board . . . .” McKenna v. Begin, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 304, 310-311 (1977), relying on Boston Hous. Authy. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished22 Mass. App. Ct. 926 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · May 19, 1986
Accordingly, he applied to the board of appeal in March, 1984, requesting a variance from the frontage requirement in order to build a one-family house on the lot. … See Girard v. Board of Appeals of Easton, 14 Mass. App. Ct. 334, 336 (1982). Compare Adamowicz v. Ipswich, 395 Mass. 757,762-763,764 (1985).
Cited 2 timesPublished392 Mass. 460 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 12, 1984
Keniston v. Assessors of Boston, supra. … See Keniston v. Assessors of Boston, supra at 890 n.4.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBagley v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board
397 Mass. 255 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 9, 1986
Bagley was a qualified member aggrieved by the local board’s failure to act. There was no decision of the board to be certified, thereafter to be susceptible to review by the District Court. Lowry v. … See Mathewson v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Bd., 335 Mass. 610, 616 (1957). Neither CRAB nor the board disputes the applicability of G. L. c. 32, § 16, to Bagley’s claim. Thus, their reliance on Welch v.
Cited 35 timesPublished4 Mass. App. Ct. 797 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Mar 26, 1976
L. c. 40A, § 21 (as in effect prior to St. 1975, c. 808, § 3), from a decision of the board of appeal of the town of Wellesley which sustained the action of the building inspector of that town in issuing a building permit … A final decree was entered pursuant to that order on May 15, 1974, which in effect affirmed the board of appeal. The plaintiff has appealed from that decree.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Mass. App. Ct. 801 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jan 17, 1973
The skeletal records before us do not disclose any question of law which may have been raised before the board. If we accept the factual assertions in the appellants’ briefs, no error of law is made to appear. Athos V. … Decisions of the Appellate Tax Board affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished333 Mass. 573 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 10, 1956
This is an appeal from a final decree entered in the Superior Court adjudging that a decision of the board of appeals of Lynnfield (hereinafter called the board) was within its jurisdiction, that the decision “should not … The building inspector on October 18, 1954, refused to issue the permit and the owner appealed to the board. C. 40A, §§ 13, 15.
Cited 0 timesPublished5 Mass. App. Ct. 821 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · May 11, 1977
Lolos v. Berlin, 338 Mass. 10, 13-14 (1958). East Longmeadow v. Springfield, ante, 143,147-148 (1977). Mass.R.A.P. 16(a) (4), as amended effective February 24, 1975, 367 Mass. 919 . … See Parrish v. Board of Appeal of Sharon, 351 Mass. 561, 567-568 (1967); S. Volpe & Co. Inc. v. Board of Appeals of Wareham, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 357, 359 (1976). Judgment affirmed.
Cited 2 timesPublishedLeary v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board
421 Mass. 344 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 14, 1995
See Williams v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Bd., 304 Mass. 601, 605 (1939) (statute ought to be construed, whenever possible, as a whole). See also Negron v. Gordon, 373 Mass. 199, 201 (1977), quoting Holbrook v. … Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp., 415 Mass. 309, 321 (1993), quoting Hartford Ins. Co. v. Hertz Corp., 410 Mass. 279, 283 (1991). Accord Bagley v. Illyrian Gardens, Inc., 401 Mass. 822, 825 (1988).
Cited 23 timesPublishedCanter v. Planning Board of Westborough
4 Mass. App. Ct. 306 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · May 17, 1976
It follows from that clear statutory language that the planning board may not disapprove a plan not shown to violate the regulations of the planning board or the requirements of the board of health. Pieper v. … Compare United Reis Homes, Inc. v. Planning Bd. of Natick, 359 Mass. at 625 . See also Rounds v. Board of Water & Sewer Commrs. of Wilmington, 347 Mass. 40, 46-47 (1964).
Cited 31 timesPublishedBoard of Selectmen v. Zoning Board of Appeals
5 Mass. L. Rptr. 417 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Mar 1, 1996
Inappropriate zoning relief will be annulled by the court as in excess of the Board of Appeals’ authority. Blasko v. Bd. of Appeals of Winchendon, 31 Mass.App.Ct. 32, 33 (1991). 6. … The court will not, *419 however, allow conditions whereby the permit-granting authority delegates matters to another board or reserves for itself important substantive decisions. Tebo v.
Cited 0 timesPublished34 Mass. App. Ct. 606 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jun 18, 1993
See Politano v. Selectmen of Nahant, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 738, 742 (1981) (facts concerning a claimant’s eligibility for benefits under G. … In Hennessey v. Bridgewater, 388 Mass. 219 (1983), the court construed the nearly identical language of the proviso in G.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCarey v. Planning Board of Revere
335 Mass. 746 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 2, 1957
There was reasonable notice also, from the fact that the members of the planning board were defendants, that the board was concerned in some way. This was insufficient notice to comply with the statute. … See Boston v. Acton, 167 Mass. 579 ; Higgins v. Boston Elevated Railway, 214 Mass. 335, 336 ; Bacon v. Paradise, 318 Mass. 649, 655 ; Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna