Case law

Bertash Market Co. v. Brown

70 Ill. App. 2d 8 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 19, 1966

defendants Brown and Wolken. … Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. United Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Employees, 400 Ill 38, 79 NE2d 46 . See also 16 Am Jur2d, Conspiracy §§ 43-55.

Cruikshank v. Brown

10 Ill. 75 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1848

Brown and James W. Brown, partners in trade, under the name of JohnH. Brown & Co., complain of George Cruikshank and John J. … Duval v. Craig, 2 Wheaton, 45 ; Chirac v. Reinicker, 11 Wheaton, 280 ; Prince v. Lamb, Breese, 278; Rust v.

Brown v. Village of Shipman

89 Ill. App. 3d 162 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 14, 1980

(Embree v. DeKalb Forge Co. (1964), 49 Ill. App. 2d 85 , 199 N.E.2d 250 ; Holcomb v. Flavin (1962), 37 Ill. App. 2d 359 , 185 N.E.2d 716 .) However, in Palier v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co. (1967), 81 Ill. … In National Oats Co. v. Volkman (1975), 29 Ill.

United States v. Brown

17 F.R.D. 286 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 24, 1955

Brown, the defendant, for the years 1947 and 1948.” … Gordon v. United States, 344 U.S. 414 , 73 S.Ct. 369 , 97 L.Ed. 447 . The principal case cited by counsel for the defendant can easily be distinguished from the case at bar. In Fryer v.

Maxwell v. Brown

186 Ill. App. 271 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 15, 1914

Straus v. Citizens’ State Bank of Elmhurst, 164 Ill. App. 420 , affirmed by the Supreme Court and reported in 254 Ill. 185 . … Penny v. Graves, 12 Ill. 287 . If there was an illegal contract between the payee of the note, the defendant and the bank, that could be shown, if at all, under the general issue.

Madden v. Brown

169 Ill. App. 456 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 11, 1912

Brown, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover the sum of-$750, claimed to be due plaintiffs for commissions. … Parmly v. Head, 33 Ill. App. 134 ; Biederman v. O’Connor, 117 Ill. 493 ; Lawrence v. Rhodes, 188 Ill. 96, 100 ; Leahy v. Hair, 33 Ill. App. 461 ; Howe v. Hutchinson, 105 Ill. 501, 504 . The judgment must be affirmed.

Cragg v. Brown

129 Ill. App. 597 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 23, 1906

The record shows that on December 30,1899, by a resolution of the board of directors the remaining $5,350 par value of treasury stock was allotted to Brown at par value. … Metcalfe v. Bradshaw, 145 Ill. 124 ; Northrop v. Phillips, 99 id. 449; Latta v. Kilbourn, 150 Ill. U. S. 524; Aas v. Benham, 2 Ch. D. 244; 2 Lindley on Partnership, See. 579.

Trouth v. Brown

186 Ill. App. 225 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 15, 1914

In Heffron v. … Brown, 155 Ill. 322 , the rule is laid down that where a person lives in the family as if a member thereof and renders services and receives support, that the services and support were all contributions to the family relation

Brown v. Saathoff

139 Ill. App. 616 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 11, 1908

Dauel v. Arnold, 201 Ill., 570 ; Reid v. Corrigan, 143 Ill., 402 . … Underhill on Wills, sections 375 and 380; Hines v. Spruill, 2 D. & B. Eq. (N. C.), 101; Young v. Young, 29 Beav., 522; Forrest v. Prescott, L. R. 10 Eq., 545.

Brown v. Kennedy

138 Ill. App. 607 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 13, 1908

Steefy v. The People, 130 Ill. 98 , is conclusive of the status of appellant on this appeal.

Board of Education v. Board of Education

63 Ill. App. 2d 196 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 2, 1965

This court previously considered the Statute in the case of Horth v. Board of Education of School Dist. … We adhere to our decision in Horth v. Board of Education of School Dist. No. 205, Winnebago County, supra.

Balough v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation

Appellate Court of Illinois · May 19, 2011

He became eligible for a full pension from the Railroad Retirement Board upon turning 60 years old on May 21, 2010. … (citing Brown v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co., 162 Ill. App. 3d 926, 931-32 (1987))) .

Starkey v. Brown Oil Co.

74 Ill. App. 2d 270 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 7, 1966

(Knab v. Alden’s Irving Park, Inc., 49 Ill App2d 371, 199 NE2d 815 ; County Board of School Trustees of Macon County v. Batchelder, et al., 7 Ill2d 178, 130 NE2d 175 , and Perez v. The Baltimore & Ohio R. … Viceeli v. Cummings, et al., 322 Ill App 559, 54 NE2d 717 .” Elbers v. Standard Oil Co., 331 Ill App 207, 72 NE2d 874 . (For the same conclusion see also Stegmann v. Zachariah, 46 Ill App2d 7, 196 NE2d 703 ; Sollars v.

East St. Louis Federation of Teachers, Local 1220 v. East St. Louis School District No. 189 Financial Oversight Panel

178 Ill. 2d 399 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1997

People v. R.G., 131 Ill. 2d 328, 342 (1989); Tiller v. Klincar, 138 Ill. 2d 1, 13-14 (1990); Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 541 , 84 L. Ed. 2d 494, 503 , 105 S. Ct. 1487, 1493 (1985). … Snowden v. Hughes, 321 U.S. 1, 7 , 88 L. Ed. 497, 502 , 64 S. Ct. 397, 400 (1944); Brown v. Perkins, 706 F. Supp. 633, 634 (N.D. Ill. 1989).

Lostutter v. Brown Shoe Co.

203 Ill. App. 517 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 12, 1916

(Holton v. Daly, 106 Ill. 131 ; Village of Ridgway v. Gallatin County, 181 Ill. 521 .) … (Strafford v. Republic Iron & Steel Co., 238 Ill. 371 ; Beauchamp v. Sturges & Burn Mfg. Co., supra.) As was said by Justice Carter in Purtell v. Philadelphia & R.

Brown v. ACMI Pop Division

375 Ill. App. 3d 276 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 2, 2007

For example, in Leopold v. … In support, Brown cites Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. Gary Saderup, Inc., 25 Cal. 4th 387 , 21 E3d 797, 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 126 (2001).

Board of Education v. Board of Education

328 Ill. App. 317 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 8, 1946

United States v. Brown

338 F. Supp. 409 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 4, 1972

Dickinson v. … Minn.1970); Slettlehough v. Tarr, 4 SSLR 3106 (D.Minn.1971). There is a critical distinction between the type of case handled by a local board and that handled by an appeal board.

Horace Mann Insurance v. Brown

236 Ill. App. 3d 456 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 13, 1992

JUSTICE O’CONNOR delivered the opinion of the court: On December 6, 1985, a car driven by defendant Robert Brown collided with another automobile on Lake Shore Drive in Chicago. … The officers had no personal knowledge of Robert’s use of the automobile or his place of residence and had to rely solely on the statement of Hamilton Brown.

Brown v. Wabash Railway Co.

96 Ill. 297 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1880

Brown, administrator of the estate of Burns Boberts, deceased, in the circuit court of Sangamon county, against the Wabash Bailway Company.