Case law

Smith v. Board of Parole

313 Or. 342 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1992

The case is remanded to the Board of Parole for further proceedings. Jenkins v. Board of Parole, 313 Or 234 , 833 P2d 1268 (1992).

Erickson v. Oregon State Board of Parole

34 Or. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 8, 1978

Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 US 778 , 93 S Ct 1756 , 36 L Ed 2d 656 (1973); Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 US 471 , 92 S Ct 2593 , 33 L Ed 2d 484 (1972). … Waltz v.

Robson v. Klamath County Board of Health

105 Or. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 16, 1991

Melby, 901 F2d 613, 618 (7th Cir 1990); Brown v. City of Trenton, 867 F2d 318, 322 (6th Cir 1989). … Only Klamath County Board of Health and Rickard appeal.

Thomas v. Board of Parole

305 Or. 46 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1988

*47 MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, a prisoner, complains that in setting his parole release date the Board of Parole (Board) improperly failed to consider a mitigating circumstance. … The Board Action Form (BAF), which this court explained in detail in the case of Anderson v.

Parmele v. Civil Service Board

53 Or. App. 7 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 1981

By the 1954 resolution, petitioners were accorded "dual status,” a term first coined in Drake v. City of Portland, 172 Or 558 , 143 P2d 213 (1943). … Duncan v. Law Enforcement Council, 37 Or App 119, 123 , 586 P2d 398 (1978), rev den (1979).

Weems v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

221 Or. App. 70 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 2, 2008

Martin v. Board of Parole, 327 Or 147, 157 , 957 P2d 1210 (1998). ORS 183.482(8) provides, in part: “(a) The court may affirm, reverse or remand the order. … See Clinical Research Institute v. Kemper Ins.

Zahos v. Board of Parole

303 Or. 695 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

Petitioner seeks review, alleging that the Board failed to satisfy the requirements of ORS 144.135 and failed to consider certain factors in mitigation. Petitioner’s procedural contentions are answered in Anderson v. … Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987). Petitioner also claims that “[t]he record reflects the Board failed to consider a number of mitigating circumstances.”

Sinclair v. Employment Relations Board

28 Or. App. 47 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 17, 1977

Colloquy between counsel and members of the Employment Relations Board indicates that the board members believed that petitioner had been engaged in protected concerted activity, but were still concerned about whether this … Green v. Hayward, 275 Or 693 , 552 P2d 815 (1976); Sunnyside Neighborhood v. Clackamas Co. Comm., 27 Or App 647 , 557 P2d 1375 (1976); McCann v. OLCC, 27 Or App 487 , 556 P2d 973 (1976); Battle Creek Golf Course v.

Gilbo v. Board of Parole

16 Or. App. 495 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 4, 1974

Sterling v. Board of Parole, 16 Or App 481 , 519 P2d 1047 (1974).

Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners

288 Or. 293 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1980

Pennsylvania State Board of Pharmacy v, Cohen, 448 Pa 189, 292 A2d 277, 282 (1972). … Board of Medical Examiners v.

Edwards v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

272 Or. App. 183 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 2015

In support of that reading of OAR 255-60-006 (1988) and Peek , the board notes that we stated in Gordon v. … For example, in Davis v.

Quintero v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

329 Or. 319 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1999

In its order of dismissal, the court cited its own intervening decision in Luckey v. Board of Parole, 150 Or App 480 , 946 P2d 361 (1997). … It is for this court, not the Board’s legal representatives, to determine what the legislature intended when it enacted ORS 144.335(3). See Lincoln Loan Co. v.

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Brown

37 Or. App. 155 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 1978

Dept. v. Madison, 27 Or App 31 , 554 P2d 1022 , rev den (1976). … Dept. v. Brown, 19 Or App 427 , 528 P2d 569 (1974), cert den, 421 US 1003 (1975).

Brown v. State of Oregon, Department of Corrections

173 F.R.D. 262 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 26, 1997

Before the court is Brown’s motion to compel discovery (# 42). … Brown alleges causes of action in his complaint based on federal statutes. Federal common law acknowledges a qualified privilege for official information, including government personnel files. Sanchez v.

Taylor v. Multnomah County Deputy Sheriff's Retirement Board

265 Or. 445 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1973

In Crawford v. … In Adams v.

Noble v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

327 Or. 485 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1998

Fuentes v. … v.

Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of Commissioners

287 Or. 591 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1979

After the board nevertheless decided to vacate the stretch of road in question, plaintiffs filed a petition for a writ of review attacking the legality of the board’s order in substance and procedure. … In Mountain v.

Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry

344 Or. 390 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 2008

181 P.3d 769 (2008) 344 Or. 390 BOISE CASCADE CORP. v. BOARD OF FORESTRY. No. S055621. Supreme Court of Oregon. March 26, 2008. Petition for review denied.

McIntyre-Cooper Co. v. Board of Commissioners

55 Or. App. 78 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 7, 1981

Petitioner appealed to the Board of County Commissioners, which affirmed the hearings officer and adopted his findings. … Sunnyside Neighborhood v. Clackamas Co. Comm., 280 Or 3 , 569 P2d 1063 (1977); Willamette University v. LCDC, 45 Or App 355 , 608 P2d 1178 (1980).

Brown v. Marion Finance Co.

168 Or. 358 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1942

Brown and G. L. … The defendant shall recover from the plaintiffs four-fifths of the cost of the transcript of testimony filed on appeal to this court: Obermeier v.