Case law

Board of County Com'rs v. State Industrial Commission

177 Okla. 645 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1936

Barnett, 65 Okla. 189 , 166 P. 207 ; Marker, Adm’r, v. Gillam, 80 Okla. 259 , 196 P. 126 ; Jones v. Gallagher, 64 Okla. 41 , 166 P. 204 ; Bristow v. … As examples thereof may be cited Ward v. Beatrice Creamery Co., 117 Okla. 31 , 245 P. 570 ; State ex rel. v. Green, 147 Okla. 119 , 294 P. 787 ; Olentine v. Calloway, supra, and Oklahoma Ry. Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Board of Ed. v. Williamson

182 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1938

Board of Education v. Short, 89 Okla. 2 , 213 P. 857 . The question presented is new. Each side asserts that no case directly in point has been found. This is so because of the newness of the homestead exemption law. … A footnote to paragraph 207, Dillon on Municipal Corporations (5th Ed.), is cited by the school board, as well as the last sentence of said paragraph, referring to Windsor v.

Schaffer v. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County

33 Okla. 288 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1912

City of Guthrie, 3 Okla. 26 , 41 Pac. 383 ; State ex rel. v. Hooker, 22 Okla. 712 , 98 Pac. 964 ; State v. Hooker, 26 Okla. 460 , 109 Pac. 527 ; Haney v. State, 34 Ark. 263 . … Y. 374 ) ; “county” was read “city” *292 (Lancaster County v. Frey, 128 Pa. 593 , 18 Atl. 478 ); “plaintiff” was read “defendant” (Hooper v.

State Ex Rel. Heartsill v. County Election Board

326 P.2d 782 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1958

See Board of County Commissioners v. Litton, supra. … See authorities cited in Yocham v. County Election Board of Creek Co., 198 Okl. 588 , 180 P.2d 831 .

Russell v. Board of Com'rs of Grant County

44 Okla. 301 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1914

not within the ordinary duties of county treasurer, but were necessary, and that the county received the benefit thereof, and should be held liable therefor, oth these questions were decided in a companion case, Zeiglar v. … was taken from the action of the board in allowing the same. “2.

Burford v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln County

63 Okla. 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1917

Gibbons v. Brittenum, 56 Miss. 249 ; State ex rel. Excelsior v. District Court, 107 Minn. 437 , 120 N. W. 894 ; State v. Heridorn, 74 Mo. 410 ; Endlich on Int. of Stat. see. 183. … Finley v. Combs, 12 Okla. 497 , 71 Pac. 625 ; Ferguson v.

Stegall v. Excise Board of Pottawatomie County

183 Okla. 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1938

S. 1931, passed a resolution setting up the item in the budget and the excise board approved it. A “biennial audit” had been made the previous year under the provisions of chapter 40, S. L. 1933. … The Court of Tax Review said: “We feel that it is a matter within the sound discretion of the board of county commissioners as to whether or not they have audits made more frequently than every other year.

Board of Education v. State ex rel. Hadden

208 Okla. 504 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1953

For interesting supporting philosophy, see: 52 Am.Jur. p. 24-25, Amoskeag Savings Bank v. Eppler, 182 Okl. 391 , 77 P.2d 1158 ; In re Seagraves, 4 Okl. 422 , 48 P. 272 ; 52 Am.Jur. p. 7. … J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and CORN, O’NEAL and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur. WELCH, DAVISON and WILLIAMS, JJ., dissent.

Board of Comrs. Washita Co. v. Burrow

8 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

Hence, this case comes clearly within the rule laid down in the case of Board v. Moon, this volume, p. 205, and Broad v. Wright, Id. 190.

Ashton v. Board of Com'rs of Murray County

58 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1916

One of the phases of the case has been before this court before (Ashton v. Board of County Commissioners of Murray County et al., 45 Okla. 731 , 147 Pac. 305 ). … (Overstreet et al. v. Citizens’ Bank, 12 Okla. 383 , 72 Pac. 379 ; Schock v. Fish, 45 Okla. 12 , 144 Pac. 584 ; Checote v. Berryhill, 48 Okla. 696 , 150 Pac. 679 .)

State Ex Rel. Board of Trustees v. Garrett

64 O.B.A.J. 1079 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1993

Board of Trustees of the Teachers’ Retirement System (Board, OTRS or collectively Appellant) seeks review of an order of the Trial Court setting aside Appellant’s decision denying Josephine Garrett (Garrett) certain retirement … Stempel v. Department of Water Resources, 82 Wash.2d 109 , 508 P.2d 166 (1973). See also, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. State Board of Education, 842 P.2d 767 (Okl.App.1992). 8 .

State Ex Rel. Carrier v. State Election Board

318 P.2d 422 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1957

Babb v. … Williamson v.

In Re Carney's Guardianship

110 Okla. 165 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1925

Brown, defendant in error, defendant below, to remove H. R. Brown as guardian of Walton Carney, an incompetent. The parties will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendant as they appeared in the lower court. … Blasdell et al. v. Gower, 70 Okla. 178 , 173 P. 644 ; Cromwell v. Hamilton, 89 Okla. 225 , 214 P. 694 ; West v. Oakey, 84 Okla. 59 , 202 P. 318 ; Okla., K. M. Ry. Co. v. Hurst, 86 Okla. 177 , 207 P. 86 ; LeForce v.

Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County v. Twyford

39 Okla. 230 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1913

In Board of Commissioners of Washita County v. … Levant, 78 Me. 568 , 7 Atl. 539 ; Talbot v. East Machias, 76 Me. 415 ; Sikes v. Hatfield, 13 Gray [Mass.] 347; Walker v. Cook, 129 Mass. 578 ; Board of County Commissioners of Greer County v.

Street v. Bethany Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund Board

555 P.2d 1295 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1976

This case comes on appeal from a decision of the Board of Trustees of the Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of the Fire Department of the City of Bethany, Oklahoma, hereinafter referred to as “Board”, denying the application … Case v. Pinnick, 186 Okl. 217 , 97 P.2d 58 (1939). We, therefore, hold that the Trial Court was in error in applying Section 364 to retired volunteer firefighters.

Faulk v. Board of Com'rs of Marshall County

40 Okla. 705 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1914

In support of their contention, they rely upon the case of North et al. v. McMahan, 26 Okla. 502 , 110 Pac. 1115 . … On the same point here involved, Chief Justice Turner, in speaking for the court, said in North et al. v.

Green v. Oklahoma Board of Bar Examiners

381 P.3d 754 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 2016

The best practice to ensure due process in these proceedings would require the Board to record and disclose the vote of each member in its written decision. . In R.J. Edwards, Inc. v. … Archer v. Ogden, 1979 OK 130, ¶¶ 7-8 , 600 P.2d 1223 ; Ford v.

Wright v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

516 P.2d 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1973

In Polk v. … v.

Board of County Com'rs v. State Highway Commission

176 Okla. 207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1936

Co. v. Illinois Commerce Commission (1933) (Ill.) 188 N.E. 177 ; Board of Com’rs of Harmon County v. Oklahoma State Highway Commission, 163 Okla. 207 , 23 P. (2d) 681 . It is held in Board of Com’rs of Harmon County v. … It is held in Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v.

Mason v. State Ex Rel. Board of Regents

72 O.B.A.J. 1112 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 2000

Brown v. … Mangla v. Brown University, 135 F.3d 80 (1st Cir.1998).