Case law

Palace Restaurant, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

271 A.2d 561 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1970

We, therefore, reverse the Board’s denial and remand the case for further proceedings consistent herewith. Cf. Rodale Press, Inc. v. F. T. C., 132 U.S.App.D.C. 317, 321 , 407 F.2d 1252, 1256 (1968). … We will not presume, in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, that the Board was improperly motivated to exercise power not assigned to it. United States v.

Adams v. United States Capitol Police Board

564 F. Supp. 2d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 2008

Background Plaintiff Frank Adams is a 54 year-old African-American Lieutenant with the United States Capitol Police Board (“USCP”). Compl. ¶ 1. … Plaintiffs claims against defendant United States Capitol Police Board shall be dismissed. An appropriate order accompanies this memorandum opinion. 1 .

Joseph v. U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

617 F. App'x 2 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 11, 2015

See Board Order 13-51, JA. at 3. … Board’s decision on these issues need not be reconsidered.

Kirven v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

379 A.2d 1186 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1977

[Morgan v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, D.C.App., 370 A.2d 1322, 1325 (1977) (footnote omitted).] … [Stoner v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, D.C.App., 368 A.2d 524, 531 (1977) (footnote omitted).]

Cooke v. Board of Education

161 F.2d 877 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 1947

During appellant’s absence he received no salary from the School Board and his school duties were discharged by a substitute. … It was this latter right that appellant exercised, not in private employment, as is suggested by counsel for the Board, but in the service of his Country, and this with the specific finding by the Board that the work to which

Bullard Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

253 F. Supp. 391 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 1966

In Norris v. National Labor Relations Board, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 106 , 177 F.2d 26 (1949), the employer based its suit on grounds similar to that in Atlas Life Insurance Company v. … The Court need not depend upon its own interpretation of Leedom v. Kyne to justify this result, for the Board itself has at least on one occasion stated that Leedom v.

Moshea v. National Transportation Safety Board

570 F.3d 349 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 2009

By departing from the Liotta precedent without explanation, the Board here acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner. Cf. Ramaprakash v. … Steenholdt v. FAA, 314 F.3d 633, 640 (D.C.Cir.2003) (no substantial prejudice where petitioner “has presented no theory under which the weak record prejudiced” his case).

Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

379 A.2d 694 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1977

Green v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 346 A.2d 252, 255 (1975), quoting Coulter v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 16 Pa.Cmwlth. 462 , 332 A.2d 876 (1975). … See also Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 294 A.2d 177, 178-79 (1972).

United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 1, 2012

U.S. v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Servs., Inc., __ F.R.D. __, 2012 WL 3776708 (D.D.C. 2012) (ECF Nos. 116, 117). … That Opinion indicated that defendant Kellogg, Brown & Root (“KBR”) is entitled to limited discovery on force protection matters relating to the parties’ LOGCAP III agreement. U.S. v. KBR, 2012 WL 3776708 at *10–*12.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2012

SEC v. Brown, 740 F. Supp. 2d 148, 172 (D.D.C. 2010). … SEC v. Brown, 740 F. Supp. 2d at 172; see In re Alsom SA, 406 F.

United States v. Brown, Kevin

463 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 5, 2006

United States v. Brown, 449 F.3d 154, 158-59  2 (D.C. Cir. 2006). … United States v. Kim, 23 F.3d 513, 517 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

United States v. Brown, Kevin

463 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 2006

None of the officers had yet read Brown his rights. But the police officer’s inquiries fall squarely within the public-safety exception to Miranda v. … * * * Brown was sentenced on November 1, 2004—after the Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), but before its decision in United States v.

Canning v. National Labor Relations Board

823 F.3d 76 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 17, 2016

v. … Servs., Inc. v. NLRB, 668 F.3d 758, 765 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (uncontested Board findings may be summarily enforced). See also Fox v. Gov’t of D.C., 794 F.3d 25, 29 (D.C.

Lopez v. National Labor Relations Board

655 F. App'x 859 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 15, 2016

No other party can prosecute an unfair labor practice charge, or challenge the Board’s decision not to do so. See, e.g., Vaca v. … Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. NLRB, 285 F.3d 1073, 1077 (D.C.Cir.2002); see also NLRB v.

Kingston v. Civil Aeronautics Board

652 F.2d 196 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1981

652 F.2d 196 209 U.S.App.D.C. 203 Kingston v. Civil Aeronautics Board 80-1028 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 3/6/81 1 C.A.B. AFFIRMED

Abadie v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board

843 A.2d 738 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 2004

See Kelly v. District of Columbia, 765 A.2d 976, 978 (D.C.2001). We said in Carter v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. … Id. at 1210; see also District of Columbia v.

Wells v. District of Columbia Board of Education

386 A.2d 703 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 15, 1978

In Matala v. Washington, supra, a police officer petitioned this court for review of the decision of the Metropolitan Police Special Trial Board to fine him for misconduct. … In Johnson v. Board of Appeals & Review, supra, former members of the United States Park Service sought review of a decision of the Police and Firemen’s Retirement Board denying them certain retirement benefits.

In Re Perrin

663 A.2d 517 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 1995

The Florida Bar v. Abrams, 402 So.2d 1150, 1153 (Fla.1981) (per curiam). … (quoting United States v.

In Re White

605 A.2d 47 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1992

Appendix DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY In the Matter of: IVAN V. WHITE, JR., Respondent. … In October, 1990, Respondent Ivan V. White, Jr. was disbarred by consent by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Glenbrook Road Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

605 A.2d 22 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1992

Rafferty v. … Hilton v. United States, 435 A.2d 383, 388 (D.C.1981). 17 The Board may not, however, prohibit cross-examination altogether, Washington v.