Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.25s
Eddie Phifer v. Board of Parole
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 14, 2001
This court has held that a Board of Paroles decision does not become final, for purposes of triggering the sixty-day deadline, until the Board rend ers a decision on the prisoner’s ap peal. Jordan v. … Similarly, in Knop v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedProsterman v. Tennessee State Board of Dental Examiners
168 Tenn. 16 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1934
The circumstance that the Court reviews the same testimony that was adduced before the board indicates that the lawmakers did not contemplate a trial de novo.” To this we cannot agree. Certainly, since Staples v. … Brown, 113 Tenn., 639 , 85 S. W., 254 , the right to a trial de novo under the statutory writ has been settled, unless, as in Nashville v. Martin, 156 Tenn., 443 , 3 S.
Cited 19 timesPublishedState Board of Law Examiners v. Shimer
131 Tenn. 343 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1914
(Mart. & Y.), 137; Smith v. State, 9 Tenn. (1 Yerg.), 228; Lawyer’s Tax Cases, 55 Tenn. (8 Heisk.), 565; Davis v. State, 92 Tenn. (8 Pick.), 634, 23 S. W., 59 ; Brooks v. Fleming, 65 Tenn. (6 Baxt.), 331; In re S. J. … W., 413 ; Hunt v. McClanahan, 48 Tenn. (1 Heisk.), 503; Ingersoll v. Coal Co., 117 Tenn. (9 Cates), 263, 98 S. W., 178 , 9 L. R. A. (N. S.), 282, 119 Am. St. Rep., 1003 , 10 Ann.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCobb v. Shelby County Board of Commissioners
771 S.W.2d 124 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 8, 1989
See Metro v. Fulton, 701 S.W.2d at 600 ; Trigg v. Mansfield, 648 S.W.2d 946 (Tenn.App.1982) (distinguishing State ex rel. Vaughn v. King, 653 S.W.2d 727 (Tenn.App.1982)). … E.g., Kavanagh v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedElectric Power Board v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
716 F. Supp. 1069 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 26, 1988
See Electric Power Board of Chattanooga, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al., No. CIV-1-85-634, Order (E.D.Tenn. Oct. 27, 1986) (Hull, J.). … v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedWilliam Garrett v. Board of Paroles
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 29, 2000
Robinson v. Traughber, 13 S.W.3d 361, 364 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999); Fite v. State Bd. of Paroles, 925 S.W.2d 543, 544 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). It is not available as a matter of right, Boyce v. … Robinson v. Traughber, 13 S.W.3d at 364.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIva Dell Brown McAlexander v. Kenneth Jackson McAlexander
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 2, 1997
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE, WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON _______________________________________________________ ) IVA DELL BROWN McALEXANDER … Hass v. Knighton, 676 S.W.2d 554, 555 (Tenn. 1984); Ruyle v. Ruyle, 928 S.W.2d 439, 441 (Tenn. App. 1996); Koch v. Koch, 874 S.W.2d 571, 575 (Tenn. App. 1993).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 28, 2000
Code Ann. § 40-28-117(a) (1997); Graham v. State, 304 S.W.2d 622, 623-24 (Tenn. 1957). A decision to grant parole is discretionary, and in the sole prerogative of the Tennessee Board of Paroles. See Tenn. … In order to obtain relief via the writ, the petitioner must establish that the Board exceeded its jurisdiction or acted illegally, fraudulently, or arbitrarily. See Arnold v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCyntoia Denise Brown v. State of Tennessee
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 6, 2014
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 11, 2014 Session CYNTOIA DENISE BROWN v. … In State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedThomas F. Mabry v. Board of Professional Responsibility
563 S.W.3d 192 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 4, 2018
MABRY v. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 193376-1 Robert E. … Standard of Review The Tennessee Supreme Court is the source of authority for the Board and its functions. In re Vogel, 482 S.W.3d 520, 530 (Tenn. 2016) (citing Long v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedRobinson v. Shelby County Board of Education
330 F. Supp. 837 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 23, 1971
Their position seems to be that the Charlotte-Mecklenburg decision [Swann v. … Green v. County School Board, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 ; Alexander v. Holmes, 396 U.S. 19 , 90 S.Ct. 29 , 24 L.Ed.2d 19 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedState Board of Law Examiners v. Williams
116 Tenn. 51 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1905
practice is good ground for disbarment; such conduct making the attorney unfit to be a member of the legal profession, and being an imposition on the court.”' 4 Cyc., p. 906, citing Lowenthal's Case, 61 Cal., 122 ; People v. … Campbell, 26 Colo., 481 , 58 Pac., 591 ,which was a case of a concealment of previous disbarment; Dean v. Stone, 2 Okl., 13 , 35 Pac., 578 ; In re Brown, 9 Pa. Dist. R., 103.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWilliam Wyatt v. Board of Paroles
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 14, 2000
M1999-00472-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 26, 2002 This appeal involves a dispute between a state prisoner and the Tennessee Board of Paroles over the Board’s decision not to parole him in 1998. … Knott v. Stewart County, 185 Tenn. 623, 626, 207 S.W.2d 337, 338-39 (1948); Ford Consumer Fin. Co. v. Clay, 984 S.W.2d 615, 616 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998); Massengill v. Massengill, 36 Tenn.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTusculum College v. State Board of Equalization
600 S.W.2d 739 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 28, 1980
Appellant also cites Vanderbilt University v. … This Court is not in position to reverse the factual finding of the Board in order to invoke the dicta of State ex rel. v. Waggoner, supra.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTennessee Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1999
In Phillips v. … In Phillips v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJoseph Beaucamp v. Board of Paroles
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 26, 1999
Courts may not (1) inquire into the intrinsic correctness of the Board’s decisions, Arnold v. Tennessee Bd. of Paroles, 956 S.W.2d 478, 480 (Tenn. 1997); Powell v. … App. 1994), (2) reweigh the evidence considered by the Board, Watts v. Civil Serv. Bd., 606 S.W.2d 274, 277 (Tenn. 1980); Hoover, Inc. v. Metropolitan Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 924 S.W.2d 900, 904 (Tenn. Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 18, 1999
Powell v. Parole Eligibility Review Board, 879 S.W.2d 871 (Tenn. App. 1994). The intrinsic correctness of the Board’s decision is not reviewable under the writ. Arnold v. … Turner’s rights with the Rules of the Board of Paroles. See Wells v. Tennessee Board of Paroles, 909 S.W.2d 826 (Tenn. App. 1995).
Cited 0 timesPublishedYoung v. Giles County Board of Education
181 F. Supp. 3d 459 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Dec 22, 2015
Plaintiff has named as Defendants the Giles County Board of Education, as well as Phillip J. Wright and Micah Landers in them individual and official capacities. … See also Chambers v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHoover, Inc. v. Metro Board of Zoning Appeals
924 S.W.2d 900 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 5, 1996
Roger’s Group, Inc. v. County of Franklin, No. 01A01-9110-CH-00378, 1992 WL 86805 , at *5 (Tenn.App.1992); see Father Ryan High School, Inc. v. City of Oak Hill, 774 S.W.2d 184, 191 (Tenn.App.1988); Merritt v. … Brooks v. Fisher, 705 S.W.2d 135, 138 (Tenn.App.1985).
Cited 71 timesPublishedCase v. Shelby County Civil Service Merit Board
98 S.W.3d 167 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 19, 2002
See Brewster v. Board of Educ., 149 F.3d 971 , 986 (9th Cir.1998). … Case cites Goodwin v. Metropolitan Board of Health, 656 S.W.2d 383 (Tenn.Ct.
Cited 43 timesPublished
Ask Donna