Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

3.07s

  • Eppler v. Board of Tax Service Examiners

    189 Or. App. 216 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 13, 2003

    In Nutbrown v. … See Shaw v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Welch v. Board of Parole

    313 Or. 343 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1992

    The case is remanded to the Board of Parole for further proceedings. Jenkins v. Board of Parole, 313 Or 234 , 833 P2d 1268 (1992).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. Board of Parole

    313 Or. 344 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1992

    The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Jenkins v. Board of Parole, 313 Or 234 , 833 P2d 1268 (1992).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fernandez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    137 Or. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 1995

    We review the Board’s order for an erroneous interpretation of a provision of law. ORS 183.482(8); Price v. Board of Parole, 301 Or 393, 396-97 , 723 P2d 314 (1986). … See Or Const, Art IV, § 25; Art V, § 15b.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners

    148 Or. 50 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1934

    Appellant asserts that this case is not good law and that it is not consistent with the two earlier cases of State Board v. Macy, 92 Wash. 614 ( 159 P. 801 ), and State Board v. Jordan, 92 Wash. 234 ( 158 P. 982 ). … In commenting on this case, it was said in State Medical Board v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Wambold v. Board of Parole

    110 Or. App. 366 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 18, 1991

    ORS 144.335; Denham v. Board of Parole, 106 Or App 234 , 806 P2d 1167 (1991). Judicial review dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Maupin v. Board of Parole

    114 Or. App. 434 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 22, 1992

    Plane v. Board of Parole, 114 Or App 60 , 834 P2d 549 (1992).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Keenan v. Board of Parole

    114 Or. App. 414 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 22, 1992

    Owens v. Board of Parole, 113 Or App 507 , 834 P2d 547 (1992.) Petitioner argues that the Board erred in finding aggravating factor O, consecutive sentences, because his consecutive sentences already include murder. … Plane v. Board of Parole, 114 Or App 60 , 834 P2d 549 (1992). Petitioner’s other arguments are without merit. Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Blacknall v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    348 Or. 131 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 2010

    Blacknall v. Board of Parole, 221 Or App 200 , 189 P3d 1234 (2008). … Board of Parole, 332 Or 266 , 27 P3d 110 (2001) and Atkinson v. Board of Parole, 341 Or 382 , 143 P3d 538 (2006). See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Morgan v. Board of Forestry

    250 Or. 460 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1969

    Early in 1942, prior to the completion of the foreclosure proceeding, the Board of Forestry acquired from Polk County a deed to an undivided three quarter interest in the disputed property, making the Board a tenant in common … See also Deardorff v. Hood River County, 84 Or Adv Sh 175, 246 Or 7 , 423 P2d 952 (1967); Evergreen Timber v. Hood River Co., 84 Or Adv Sh 205, 246 Or 11 , 423 P2d 963 (1967); Johnson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Scherzinger v. Portland Custodians Civil Service Board

    209 Or. App. 394 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 6, 2006

    The district relies on cases such as Ahern v. … See Beldt v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hammond v. Liberty Nw. Ins. Corp. (In re Comp. of Hammond)

    296 Or. App. 241 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 27, 2019

    Finally, in a supplemental brief, claimant contends that the Supreme Court's opinion in Brown v. … The board nonetheless reached the correct conclusion that the fracture was not compensable as an initial claim. See Conner v. B & S Logging , 153 Or.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rinne v. Psychiatric Sec. Review Bd.

    297 Or. App. 549 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 15, 2019

    Id. ; see also Castro v. Board of Parole , 232 Or. App. 75 , 85-86, 220 P.3d 772 (2009) ("Our duty is to evaluate the board's logic, not to supply it."). … Drew v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Papadopoulos v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

    14 Or. App. 130 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 1973

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 US 564 , 92 S Ct 2701 , 33 L Ed 2d 548 (1972); Perry *165 v. Sindermann, 408 US 593 , 92 S Ct 2694 , 33 L Ed 2d 570 (1972); see also, Slochower v. … We have previously treated the Board’s 1969 Adm. Code as having the force of law. West v. Bowers, 11 Or App 364 , 502 P2d 270 (1972), Sup Ct review denied (1973); Vandever v.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Pilgrim v. Board of Parole

    303 Or. 689 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

    Petitioner seeks review, alleging that the Board failed to satisfy the requirements of ORS 144.135 and to consider certain factors in mitigation. Petitioner’s procedural contentions are answered in Anderson v. … Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reese v. Board of Parole

    303 Or. 692 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

    At petitioner’s prison term hearing, the Board of Parole (Board) established a history/risk score of 6, and crime category 7, bringing petitioner within a matrix range of 168 to 228 months, but continued the matter to clarify … Petitioner seeks review, alleging that the Board failed to satisfy the requirements of ORS 144.135. Petitioner’s procedural contentions are answered in Anderson v. Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lyford v. BOARD OF COM'RS FOR BENTON

    59 Or. App. 585 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 1982

    On review of this court’s decision in Hitchcock v. McMinnville City Council, supra, the Supreme Court observed in dictum that with the expansion by Fasano v. Washington Co. … See Adam v. City of Scappoose, 27 Or App 219 , 555 P2d 809 (1976).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hancock v. Board of Parole

    105 Or. App. 627 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 13, 1991

    The Board argues, however, that the “Board’s motivation [for setting petitioner’s parole date] is easily deduced.” … . *629 The Board may be correct in its rationale for its decision, but its explanation does not meet the requirement of ORS 144.135 that the order state the bases for its decision. See Harris v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reed v. Board of Parole

    21 Or. App. 302 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 5, 1975

    Bailleaux v. Cupp, 16 Or App 573 , 520 P2d 483 , Sup Ct review denied (1974); Sterling v. Bd. of Parole, 16 Or App 481 , 519 P2d 1047 , Sup Ct review denied (1974).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Queen v. Board of Parole

    16 Or. App. 496 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 4, 1974

    Sterling v. Board of Parole, 16 Or App. 481, 519 P2d 1047 (1974),

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.