Case law

Oklahoma City v. Board of Ed., Oklahoma City

181 Okla. 539 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1938

Kohl v. United States. 91 U. S. 367 , 23 L. Ed. 449 ; United States v. Hale, 51 Fed. (2d) 629; City of Enterprise v. Smith (Kan.) 62 P. 324 , and that the word “held” might be made to connote ownership. … V. C. X, and GIBSON and DAVI-SON, JJ., absent.

Stroman Motor Co. v. Brown

116 Okla. 36 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1925

Woods purchased the casing from Brown, taking possession of the truck and continued to operate it for about two months, during which time he had paid about; $140 on the tires to the said Brown, ap-pellee here, at which time … In the case of Sternaman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 170 N. Y. 13 , 62 N. E. 763 , 88 Am. St. Rep. 625 , 57 L. R.

Board of Com'rs of Alfalfa Co. v. Ferguson

65 Okla. 311 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1917

Laws 1910, provides: “The district court may make a final judgment and cause the same to be executed, or may send the same back to the board with an order how to proceed, and require said board of county commissioners to … In Avery v.

State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rs v. McCurdy

115 Okla. 111 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1925

This is substantially what was held in Jackson v. Levy, 75 Okla. 256 , 183 Pac. 505 ; Burford et ux. v. Territorial Land Co. et al., 81 Okla. 102 , 204 Pac. 274 ; and Bynum v. … The same contentions were presented in No. 14539, National Surety Company v. State et al., from Comanche county, and 14790, National Surety Company v.

Sappington v. Board of Com'rs of Jefferson County

134 Okla. 253 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1928

Palmer v. Palmer, 36 Mich. 487 . In the case of County Board of Education v. State Board of Education (N. C.) 12 S. … In the case of Board of County Commissioners of Woodward Co. v.

Little v. County Exclse Board of Marshall County

161 Okla. 40 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1932

Sneed v. Tippett, 114 Okla. 173 , 245 P. 40 . Since the increasing of any item of an estimate by the excise board is not required by the statute, this court cannot require such an increase to be made by mandamus. … the estimate made by the board of counts' commissioners to the excise board under the provisions of section 9695, C.

Western Paint & Chemical Co. v. Board of Com'rs

161 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1933

In Board of Com’rs v. … Board of County Com’rs v. Seawell, supra. It is not sufficient that the services performed without authority for which payment was demanded are beneficial to the county. Board of Com’rs v.

Chickasaw Lumber Co. v. Board of Com'rs

173 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1935

Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, 125 Okla. 226 , 257 P. 324 ; Board of County Commissioners of Carter County v. Landrum, 163 Okla. 199 , 21 P. (2d) 736 . … Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, 171 Okla. 302 , 42 P. *198 (2d) 533. We see no reason for departing from tire rule announced therein. Judgment affirmed. McNEILL, O. J., OSBORN, V. O.

Phillips v. North, Board of County Com'rs.

36 Okla. 257 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1912

Phillips, against the board of county commissioners of Tulsa county, for an order restraining said defendants, as a board of county commissioners of said county, from entering into any contract for the construction of the … wit, lot 4 and the south 50 feet of lot 5, block 149, in *258 the city of Tulsa, because of an alleged defect in title in said property, and prayed for temporary restraining order pending an appeal from an order of the board

Lairmore v. Board of Com'rs of Okmulgee County

200 Okla. 436 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1948

In the case of Parkinson v. … The language used in the case of Bostick v.

Williamson v. Board of Education of Woodward

189 Okla. 342 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1941

Sinclair v. Board of Education of the City of Coffeyville, 115 Kan. 434 , 222 P. 766 . … Fennell v. Lannom, 46 Okla. 519 , 149 P. 144 ; Ryan v. Humphries, 50 Okla. 343 , 150 P. 1106 , L. R. A. 1915F, 1047; Stewart v. Board of Education, 104 Okla. 141 , 230 P. 504 .

Board of Com'rs of Carter County v. Worten

128 Okla. 104 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 29, 1927

Mayes v. Breckinridge, 43 Okla. 711 , 142 Pac. 407 ; Morrison v. Brown, 26 Okla. 201 , 109 Pac. 237 ; State v. Huston, 27 Okla. 606 113 Pac. 190 ; Billings Hotel Co. v. … Morrison v. Brown, 26 Okla. 201 109 Pac. 237 ; Pioneer Tel. Co. v. Bartlesville, 27 Okla. 214 , 111 Pac. 207 ; State v. Huston, 27 Okla. 606 , 113 Pac. 190 ; Herndon v. Hammond, 28 Okla. 616 , 115 Pac. 775 .

PELLEBON v. STATE ex rel. BOARD OF REGENTS

358 P.3d 288 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 6, 2015

STANDARD OF REVIEW __ { 12 We review de novo an order dismissing a case for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. - Fonning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7, 4 , 85 P.8d 841. … Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7, ¶23 , 85 P.3d 841 .

State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. State Election Board

29 Okla. 31 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1911

Stearns, Mayor, et al. v. State ex rel., 23 Okla. 462, 100 Pac. 909 . … This court said in the case of Grove v.

Harper v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County

54 Okla. 545 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1915

Still later, in the case of Board of Co. Com’rs v. … Anderson v. Board of Co. Com’rs, 44 Okla. 164 , 143 Pac. 1145 ; Ziegler v. Board of Co. Com’rs, 44 Okla. 266 , 144 Pac. 381 ; Orendorff v. Board of Co. Com’rs, 44 Okla. 271 , 144 Pac. 383 ; Huntington et al. v.

Levy Bros. v. Board of Com'rs, Noble Co.

101 Okla. 241 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1924

The case of Cleveland National Bank v. … A near approach is the case of Lindsey v. Boone County, 92 Iowa, 86 .

Orendorff v. Board of Com'rs of Grant County

44 Okla. 271 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1914

Ticer v. State ex rel. Holt, 35 Okla. 1 , 128 Pac. 493 ; Board of Com’rs of Washita Co. v. Brett, 32 Okla. 853 , 124 Pac. 57; Anderson v. Board of Com’rs of Grant County, ante, 143 Pac. 1145 . … Board v. Hubble, 8 Okla. 209 , 57 Pac. 163 ; Linson v. Spaulding, 23 Okla. 254 , 108 Pac. 747 .

Briggs v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF MUSKOGEE COUNTY

202 Okla. 684 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1950

ARNOLD, V. C. J. Eddie J. … The injunction was denied and the board of county commissioners declared a vacancy existed and filled it.

Board of Com'rs of Harmon Cty. v. Keen

194 Okla. 593 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1944

See Hazlett v. Board of County Commissioners, 168 Okla. 290 , 32 P. 2d 940 , and authorities there cited. And this rule prevails generally in the other states. 15 C. J. 568; 20 C. J. S. 1067; 14 Am. Jur. 215 ; 7 R. C. … In Whiteneck v. Board of County Commissioners, 89 Okla. 52 , 213 P. 865 , we answered this question in the negative.

Savery v. Board of Com'rs of Beaver County

173 Okla. 284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1935

The effect of a failure to give 21 days’ notice of a tax sale has been expressly passed upon by this court in the case of Foster v. Board of County Commissioners of Marshall County, 144 Okla. 14 , 289 P. 347 . … The case of Foster v. Board of County Commissioner of Cimarron County, 145 Okla. 210 , 292 P. 11 , therefore does not apply here as to these void certificates.