Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

1.38s

  • State v. Hakum Brown State v. Rodney Brown (083353) (Essex County, Middlesex County, & Statewide)

    Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 2021

    State v. Hakum Brown; State v. Rodney Brown (A-39-19) (083353) Argued October 14, 2020 -- Decided January 25, 2021 LaVECCHIA, J., writing for the Court. … In 1995, Rodney Brown (R.B.) was convicted of sexual assault. In 2000, Hakum Brown (H.B.) was convicted of sexual assault and endangering the welfare of a child.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • TARZIAN v. Board of Review

    200 N.J. 547 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 2009

    985 A.2d 647 (2009) 200 N.J. 547 TARZIAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND VERIZON. No. C-479 September Term 2009, 064499 Supreme Court of New Jersey. December 16, 2009. Petition for Certification Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moretti v. Board of Review

    196 N.J. 85 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 12, 2008

    951 A.2d 1038 (2008) 196 N.J. 85 MORETTI v. BOARD OF REVIEW. No. C-1065 September Term 2007, 62,681 Supreme Court of New Jersey. June 12, 2008. Petition for certification. Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pushko v. Board of Trustees

    102 N.J. 349 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 1985

    Petition for certification granted and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division, Superior Court, for reconsideration in light of our decision today in Kane v. … Board of Trustees, Police and Firemen’s Retirement System, 100 N.J. 651 (1985). Jurisdiction is not retained.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pt. Pleasant Manor Building Co. v. Brown

    42 N.J. Super. 297 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 29, 1956

    Super. 297 (1956) 126 A.2d 219 POINT PLEASANT MANOR BUILDING CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARTHUR F. BROWN & FRANCES G. BROWN, HIS WIFE; CLARENCE J. … Plaintiff's final point is that even if it be conceded that there was a dedication, nevertheless the dedication was in favor of the defendant board of education; that, however, the board cannot accept it because a Board of

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.

    79 N.J. 489 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 5, 1979

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • IAPPELLI v. Board of Review

    200 N.J. 547 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 11, 2009

    985 A.2d 646 (2009) 200 N.J. 547 IAPPELLI v. BOARD OF REVIEW. No. C-419 September Term 2009, 064432 Supreme Court of New Jersey. December 11, 2009. Petition for Certification Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brambila v. Board of Review

    241 N.J. Super. 216 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 8, 1990

    Super. 216 (1990) 574 A.2d 992 CAROLINA BRAMBILA AND MARIO BRAMBILA, CLAIMANTS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. … Esparza, supra; Sudomir v. McMahon, 767 F. 2d 1456 (9th Cir.1985). Holley v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Brambila v. Board of Review, 124 N.J. 425 (1991)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sayre v. Board of Excise

    81 N.J.L. 79 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 10, 1911

    The power conferred upon the board of excise commissioners is the same as conferred upon the boards of commissioners under the act of 1902. Pamph. L., p. 628. It was held, in Sexton v. … Board of Excise Commissioners, 47 Vroom 102 , that the latter boards in granting licenses were limited by the provisions of the Inn and Tavern act. The same doctrine was applied in the case of Reed v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pbk v. Board of Educ.

    343 N.J. Super. 419 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 2, 2001

    Bd. of Educ. of Summit v. Millburn Twp. Bd. of Educ., 95 N.J. Admin.2d (EDU) 506 (1994); Clifton Bd. of Educ. v. Sauro, 96 N.J. Admin.2d (EDU) 497, 500 (1996) (citing Mansfield Twp. v. … Administrative case law tends to support the decision of the State Board. In D.K.S. and K.S.S., ex rel H.I.L. v. Bd. of Educ. of Fort Lee, Agency Dkt.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Casciano v. Board of Review

    300 N.J. Super. 570 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 16, 1997

    Self v. Board of Review, 91 N.J. 453 , 453 A.2d 170 (1982). After careful review of all testimony, it is the findings of this Tribunal that the claimant left his job with employer # 1 for personal reasons. … In Rider College v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • George v. Board of Excise

    74 N.J.L. 816 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 17, 1907

    Moran v. Jersey City, 29 Vroom 653 ; Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co. v. Newark, 34 Id. 310; Morris & Cummings Dredging Co. v. Jersey City , 35 Id. 587; Suburban Land Co. v. … Vailsburg, 39 Id. 311; Yellow Pine Co. v. Board of Assessors, 43 Id. 182. The testimony before the Supreme Court was competent and certainly did not compel any other conclusion than that reached by the court.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Board of Education

    125 N.J. 299 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 30, 1991

    See, e.g., Michaels v. Brookchester, Inc., 26 N.J. 379, 388 , 140 A.2d 199 *306 (1958); The Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers and Cosmetologists’ Int’l Union of Am. v. … Kennedy v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 16 N.J. 280, 294 , 108 A.2d 409 (1954); Board of Educ. v. Woodstown-Pilesgrove Regional Educ.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • B.C. v. Board of Education

    220 N.J. Super. 214 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 23, 1987

    Hinfey v. Matawan Regional Board of Education, 147 N.J.Super. 201 (App.Div.1977), rev’d on other grounds 77 N.J. 514 (1978). … But see E.B. et al v. North Hunterdon Board of Education *228 (Agency Dkt. No. 282-85/85, OAL Dkt. No.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Board of Health v. Werner

    67 N.J.L. 103 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1901

    Constructing the work “without their having first filed with the secretary of the board of health a plan thereof, signed by the owner.” Second. … Because they constructed the work “without the approval of the board of health being first secured therefor.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Board of Excise

    57 N.J.L. 603 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1895

    But, assuming that the board made a mistake, it does not appear that the mistake was induced by any fraudulent conduct of the petitioner. It was an error attributable to infirmity of judgment in the board. … But the power of the board itself to revoke is limited to instances where the license has been fraudulently procured or where the statute has expressly conferred the power of revocation. Lantz v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rose v. Board of Review

    199 N.J. 515 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 8, 2009

    973 A.2d 383 (2009) 199 N.J. 515 ROSE v. BOARD OF REVIEW. C-896 September Term 2008, 63,689 Supreme Court of New Jersey. May 8, 2009. Petition for certification. Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • PARFITT v. Board of Review

    199 N.J. 540 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 3, 2009

    973 A.2d 944 (2009) 199 N.J. 540 PARFITT v. BOARD OF REVIEW. C-982 September Term 2008, 63,835 Supreme Court of New Jersey. June 3, 2009. Petition for certification. Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barcalow v. Board of Education

    14 N.J. Misc. 718 · New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau · Aug 6, 1936

    Rep. 545 ; Matthews Construction Co. v. Ranallo, 13 N. J. Mis. R. 878; 181 Atl. … See Clover, Clayton & Co., Ltd., v. Hughes (1910), Appeal Cases, 242 (at pp. 246, 247).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • C.W. v. Roselle Board of Education

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 15, 2026

    January 15, 2026 APPELLATE DIVISION ROSELLE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Respondent, and NEW JERSEY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant, and ROSELLE BOARD … Plaintiff relies on Kruvant v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.