Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

4.69s

  • McDuffie v. D.C. Board of Elections

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 2022

    McDuffie, the Board, and intervenor/challenger Bruce V. Spiva, was held on April 27, 2022. … See District of Columbia v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dupuy v. National Labor Relations Board

    806 F.3d 556 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 17, 2015

    Cir. 1986) (reversing as-yet unenforced Board orders); Jackman v. … The Board cited Amalgamated Utility Workers v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Weigand v. National Labor Relations Board

    783 F.3d 889 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 2015

    The Board’s decision regarding the Facebook postings is “the product of reasoned decisionmaking,” Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n of U.S. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. … Id.; see also NLRB v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ruisi v. National Labor Relations Board

    856 F.3d 1031 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 16, 2017

    Under this deferential standard of review, we will reverse the Board “only when the record is so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find to the contrary.” Bally’s Park Place, Inc. v. … Finally, “[w]here, as here, the Board adopts the ALJ’s findings and conclusions as its own, we apply the same deferential standard to those findings and conclusions.” Weigand v. NLRB, 783 F.3d 889, 895 (D.C.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re J. Scott Brown

    80 A.3d 1043 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2013

    PER CURIAM: The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that we disbar James Scott Brown because Mr. … The Board concluded that conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud is a crime of moral turpitude per se and recommended that we disbar Mr. Brown. Mr. Brown did not oppose the Board’s recommendation.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Shepherd v. Merit System Protection Board

    652 F.2d 1040 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 1981

    . § 317.302(a)(1)(v). … Creamery v. Wickard, 140 F.2d 485, 488 (7th Cir. 1944); United States v. Carpenter, 84 F.2d 813, 814 (10th Cir. 1936). .

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • NATHALIA L. BROWN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 2016

    BROWN, Petitioner, JUN - 9 2016 v. … BROWN, PETITIONER, V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Riley v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

    278 A.2d 691 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1971

    The Board insists that October 29, the date of mailing, controls. In District Unemployment Compensation Board v. Wm. Hahn & Co., 130 U.S.App. D.C. 254, 399 F.2d 987 (1968), the court was faced with an analogous problem. … See Woodridge Nursery School v. Jessup, D.C.App., 269 A.2d 199 (1970).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Boorda v. Subversive Activities Control Board

    421 F.2d 1142 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 1969

    See Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 606-607 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 488 , 81 S.Ct. 247 , 5 L.Ed.2d 231 (1960). … The Board relies upon Adler v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 485, 494-495 , 72 S.Ct. 380 , 96 L.Ed. 517 , 27 A.L.R.2d 472 (1952), for the contrary proposition. But the Supreme Court in Keyishian v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hickenbottom v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

    273 A.2d 475 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 1971

    The Board affirmed the appeals examiner’s decision without modification. … Gregory v. Anderson, 14 Wis.2d 130 , 109 N.W.2d 675, 679 (1961). 10 . Milwaukee Transformer Co. v. Indus. Comm’n., 22 Wis.2d 502 , 126 N.W.2d 6, 12 (1964). 11 . Woodridge Nursery School v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Czarra v. Board of Medical Supervisors

    25 App. D.C. 443 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 1905

    Meffert v. State Bd. of Medical Registration, 66 Kan. 710 , 72 Pac. 247 ; State ex rel. Chapman v. State Medical Examiners, 34 Minn. 387 , 26 N. W. 123 ; State Bd. of Health v. Roy, 22 R. … Baldwin v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In Re Drew

    693 A.2d 1127 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1997

    The Board also agrees that Respondent violated Rule 1.1(b) in connection with his representation of Brown. … Samuels v. United States, 435 A.2d 392, 395 (D.C.1981).” (Ibid). Bar Counsel also referred to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Martin v. United States Board of Parole

    199 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 4, 1961

    This has been the law in the District of Columbia since the decision in Fleming v. … Glenn v. Reed, D.C., 289 F.2d 462 . 3 . Reed v. Butterworth, (Ct.App.D.C.) 297 F.2d 776 , decided November 9, 1961. 4 . Escoe v. Zerbst, 295 U.S. 490 , 55 S.Ct. 818 , 79 L.Ed. 1566 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Music Choice v. Copyright Royalty Board

    774 F.3d 1000 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 19, 2014

    COPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD, APPELLEE SIRIUS XM RADIO INC. … Music Choice has not persuaded us, through its citation to U.S. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Alton R. Co. v. Railroad Retirement Board

    16 F. Supp. 955 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1936

    v. … In Hepburn v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hill v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

    279 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1971

    Commenting on the above section of the Code in Woodridge Nursery School v. … As the Supreme Court said in United States v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 204 v. National Labor Relations Board

    447 F.3d 821 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 2006

    Nor can Smithfield prevail on its claim that the Board may not require it to notify everyone the company has employed since 1993 of the Board’s decision. Upholding a similar notification order in Teamsters Local 115 v. … But “[a] party challenging the Board’s choice of remedy must show that the remedy is clearly inadequate in light of the findings of the Board.” Teamsters Local Union No. 639 v. NLRB, 924 F.2d 1078, 1085 (D.C.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Conrad v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 2023

    See, e.g., Compton v. D.C. … See, e.g., Haight v. D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

    395 A.2d 392 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1978

    See Hawkins v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 381 A.2d 619, 622 (1977) (per curiam). … See Williams v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 383 A.2d 345, 349 (1978); Hickenbottom v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 273 A.2d 475, 478 (1971).

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • In Re Brown

    617 A.2d 194 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1992

    During the remand hearing Brown equivocated about whether he intended to deceive the Virginia Board. … the Virginia Board.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.