Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.69s
McDuffie v. D.C. Board of Elections
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 2022
McDuffie, the Board, and intervenor/challenger Bruce V. Spiva, was held on April 27, 2022. … See District of Columbia v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDupuy v. National Labor Relations Board
806 F.3d 556 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 17, 2015
Cir. 1986) (reversing as-yet unenforced Board orders); Jackman v. … The Board cited Amalgamated Utility Workers v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedWeigand v. National Labor Relations Board
783 F.3d 889 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 2015
The Board’s decision regarding the Facebook postings is “the product of reasoned decisionmaking,” Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n of U.S. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. … Id.; see also NLRB v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedRuisi v. National Labor Relations Board
856 F.3d 1031 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 16, 2017
Under this deferential standard of review, we will reverse the Board “only when the record is so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find to the contrary.” Bally’s Park Place, Inc. v. … Finally, “[w]here, as here, the Board adopts the ALJ’s findings and conclusions as its own, we apply the same deferential standard to those findings and conclusions.” Weigand v. NLRB, 783 F.3d 889, 895 (D.C.
Cited 3 timesPublished80 A.3d 1043 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2013
PER CURIAM: The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that we disbar James Scott Brown because Mr. … The Board concluded that conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud is a crime of moral turpitude per se and recommended that we disbar Mr. Brown. Mr. Brown did not oppose the Board’s recommendation.
Cited 3 timesPublishedShepherd v. Merit System Protection Board
652 F.2d 1040 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 1981
. § 317.302(a)(1)(v). … Creamery v. Wickard, 140 F.2d 485, 488 (7th Cir. 1944); United States v. Carpenter, 84 F.2d 813, 814 (10th Cir. 1936). .
Cited 19 timesPublishedNATHALIA L. BROWN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 2016
BROWN, Petitioner, JUN - 9 2016 v. … BROWN, PETITIONER, V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRiley v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board
278 A.2d 691 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1971
The Board insists that October 29, the date of mailing, controls. In District Unemployment Compensation Board v. Wm. Hahn & Co., 130 U.S.App. D.C. 254, 399 F.2d 987 (1968), the court was faced with an analogous problem. … See Woodridge Nursery School v. Jessup, D.C.App., 269 A.2d 199 (1970).
Cited 6 timesPublishedBoorda v. Subversive Activities Control Board
421 F.2d 1142 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 1969
See Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 606-607 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 488 , 81 S.Ct. 247 , 5 L.Ed.2d 231 (1960). … The Board relies upon Adler v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 485, 494-495 , 72 S.Ct. 380 , 96 L.Ed. 517 , 27 A.L.R.2d 472 (1952), for the contrary proposition. But the Supreme Court in Keyishian v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedHickenbottom v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board
273 A.2d 475 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 1971
The Board affirmed the appeals examiner’s decision without modification. … Gregory v. Anderson, 14 Wis.2d 130 , 109 N.W.2d 675, 679 (1961). 10 . Milwaukee Transformer Co. v. Indus. Comm’n., 22 Wis.2d 502 , 126 N.W.2d 6, 12 (1964). 11 . Woodridge Nursery School v.
Cited 35 timesPublishedCzarra v. Board of Medical Supervisors
25 App. D.C. 443 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 1905
Meffert v. State Bd. of Medical Registration, 66 Kan. 710 , 72 Pac. 247 ; State ex rel. Chapman v. State Medical Examiners, 34 Minn. 387 , 26 N. W. 123 ; State Bd. of Health v. Roy, 22 R. … Baldwin v.
Cited 10 timesPublished693 A.2d 1127 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1997
The Board also agrees that Respondent violated Rule 1.1(b) in connection with his representation of Brown. … Samuels v. United States, 435 A.2d 392, 395 (D.C.1981).” (Ibid). Bar Counsel also referred to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedMartin v. United States Board of Parole
199 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 4, 1961
This has been the law in the District of Columbia since the decision in Fleming v. … Glenn v. Reed, D.C., 289 F.2d 462 . 3 . Reed v. Butterworth, (Ct.App.D.C.) 297 F.2d 776 , decided November 9, 1961. 4 . Escoe v. Zerbst, 295 U.S. 490 , 55 S.Ct. 818 , 79 L.Ed. 1566 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedMusic Choice v. Copyright Royalty Board
774 F.3d 1000 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 19, 2014
COPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD, APPELLEE SIRIUS XM RADIO INC. … Music Choice has not persuaded us, through its citation to U.S. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedAlton R. Co. v. Railroad Retirement Board
16 F. Supp. 955 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1936
v. … In Hepburn v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedHill v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board
279 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1971
Commenting on the above section of the Code in Woodridge Nursery School v. … As the Supreme Court said in United States v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R.
Cited 9 timesPublishedUnited Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 204 v. National Labor Relations Board
447 F.3d 821 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 2006
Nor can Smithfield prevail on its claim that the Board may not require it to notify everyone the company has employed since 1993 of the Board’s decision. Upholding a similar notification order in Teamsters Local 115 v. … But “[a] party challenging the Board’s choice of remedy must show that the remedy is clearly inadequate in light of the findings of the Board.” Teamsters Local Union No. 639 v. NLRB, 924 F.2d 1078, 1085 (D.C.
Cited 16 timesPublishedConrad v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 2023
See, e.g., Compton v. D.C. … See, e.g., Haight v. D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJones v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board
395 A.2d 392 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1978
See Hawkins v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 381 A.2d 619, 622 (1977) (per curiam). … See Williams v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 383 A.2d 345, 349 (1978); Hickenbottom v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 273 A.2d 475, 478 (1971).
Cited 23 timesPublished617 A.2d 194 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1992
During the remand hearing Brown equivocated about whether he intended to deceive the Virginia Board. … the Virginia Board.
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna