Case law

Morgan v. Board of Com'rs of Logan County

59 Okla. 290 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1916

It needs no citation of authorities, but see the cases of V. J. Howard et al. v. Freeman Arkansaw et al., 59 Okla. —, 158 Pac. 437 , and cases cited therein; and Childs v. Moore, 45 Okla. 206 , 157 Pac. 333 , Byrd v. … Harrison, 45 Okla. 142 , 145 Pac. 318 ; McLean v. McLean et al., 45 Okla. 765 , 147 Pac. 302 , and cases cited.

Board of Com'rs of Creek County v. Robinson

140 Okla. 142 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1929

Board of County Commissioners was somewhat criticized by this court in the recent case of Eaton, Treasurer, v. St. L. & S. F. Ry. … It has been expressly held by this court in the case of Eckles v. Board of County Commissioners of Hughes County.

Board of Equalization v. Tulsa Pythian Benevolent Ass'n

195 Okla. 458 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1945

Under these facts it is apparent that the questions here presented are governed by the rule of Oklahoma County v.

Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County v. Lemley

23 Okla. 306 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1909

It has been held by this court in at least three cases (Humphrey v. Hunt, 9 Okla. 196 , 59 Pac. 971 , Wedd v. Gates et al., 15 Okla. 602 , 82 Pac. 808 , and Strange v. … Chief Justice Burford, in Outcalt v.

Board of County Commissioners v. State Capital Co.

16 Okla. 625 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1906

In the case of Allen and Rixse, v. … In the Allen-Rixse v.

Foster v. Board of Com'rs of Marshall County

144 Okla. 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1930

Cadman v. Smith, 15 Okla. 633 , 85 Pac. 346 ; Smith v. Bostaph, 103 Okla. 258 , 229 Pac. 1041 ; Sitton v. Hernstadt, 106 Okla. 140 , 233 Pac. 676 . … ease showing that the county commissioners or the excise board created a fund to take care of such claims, as is provided in the statute which deals with erroneous assessments.

United States v. Board of Com'rs

271 F. 747 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1921

In Ward v. Board of County Commissioners of Love County, Oklahoma, 253 U. S. 17 , 40 Sup. Ct. 419, 64 L. … Fink v. Board of County Commissioners, 248 U. S. 399 , 39 Sup. Ct. 128, 63 I,. Ed. 324.

Robinson v. Board of Com'rs of Marshall County

151 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1931

A question almost identical with the case at bar was considered by this court in the case of Rodolph v. Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County, 122 Okla. 120 , 251 Pac. 740 . … Board of Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Beatty, 67 Okla. 281 , 171 Pac. 34 ; Key v. Donnell, 107 Okla. 157 , 231 Pac. 546 ; White v. Infield, 122 Okla. 4 , 250 Pac. 81 ; Diehl v.

Nunley v. U. S. Board of Paroles

439 F. Supp. 887 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1977

mootness 429 U.S. 60 , 97 S.Ct. 342 , 50 L.Ed.2d 218 (1976); Brown v. … Lupo v. Norton, 371 F.Supp. 156 (D.Conn. 1974); Soloway v. Weger, 389 F.Supp. 409 (N.D.Pa.1974); Billiteri v. U. S. Board of Parole, 385 F.Supp. 1217 (W.D.N.Y.1974); Craft v.

Deal v. Excise Board of Pontotoc County

179 Okla. 73 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1937

In Board of County Commissioners of Okmulgee County v. Jenness, 178 Okla. 54 , 61 P. (2d) 724 , the first and second paragraphs of the syllabus are as follows: “Section 4160, O. S. 1931 (ch. 22, sec. 1, S. … Sinclair Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board of Tulsa County, 173 Okla. 375 , 49 P. (2d) 114 .

Board of Com'rs of Noble County v. Whitney

73 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1918

Anderson v. Board of County Com’rs, 44 Okla. 164 , 143 Pac. 1145 ; Board of Commissioners v. Brett. 32 Okla. 853 , 124 Pac. 57 . … Trimmer v. Rennie, 43 Okla. 152 , 141 Pac. 784 .

Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County v. Ryan

107 Okla. 278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 2, 1924

Board of Equalization of Greer County, 87 Okla. 297 , 210 Pac. 1025 . … Bank of Chickasha, 58 Okla. 508 , 160 Pac. 469 ; Board of Equalization v. First State Bank, 77 Okla. 291 , 188 Pac. 115 : Brown v. Hennessy State Bank, 78 Okla. 141 , 189 Pac. 355 ; Board of Equalization v. Peoples Nat.

Harlow v. Board of Com'rs of Payne County

33 Okla. 353 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 23, 1912

(Allen et al. v. Board of County Commissioners of Pittsburg County, 28 Okla. 773 , 116 Pac. 175 .) … Laws 1909, as construed in Smith et al. v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County, 26 Okla. 819 , 110 Pac. 669 .

Boardman Co. v. Board of Com'rs, Ellis Co.

136 Okla. 85 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1929

Board of County Commissioners of Atoka County, 248 Fed. 93 , 160 C. C. A. 233 . In the case of Litchfield v. Ballou. 114 U. … Board of County Commissioners, Day County v. State of Kansas, 19 Okla. 375 , 91 Pac. 699 ; Okla. Moline Plow Co. v. Smith, 81 Okla. 61 , 196 Pac. 962 ; Brown v. Calvert, 57 Okla. 364 , 157 Pac. 284 ; Johnson v.

Ewing v. Board of Commissioners of Ellis County

53 Okla. 250 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1916

See, also, Brittan v. Oakland Bank of Savings, 124 Cal. 282 , 57 Pac. 74 , 71 Am. St. Rep. 58 . In Hitchcock v. Galveston, 96 U. S. 341 , 24 L. Ed. 659 , the court, quoting approvingly from State Board of Agriculture v. … In Lowe et al. v.

Board of Com'rs of Alfalfa Co. v. Ferguson

65 Okla. 311 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1917

Laws 1910, provides: “The district court may make a final judgment and cause the same to be executed, or may send the same back to the board with an order how to proceed, and require said board of county commissioners to … In Avery v.

Sappington v. Board of Com'rs of Jefferson County

134 Okla. 253 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1928

Palmer v. Palmer, 36 Mich. 487 . In the case of County Board of Education v. State Board of Education (N. C.) 12 S. … In the case of Board of County Commissioners of Woodward Co. v.

Little v. County Exclse Board of Marshall County

161 Okla. 40 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1932

Sneed v. Tippett, 114 Okla. 173 , 245 P. 40 . Since the increasing of any item of an estimate by the excise board is not required by the statute, this court cannot require such an increase to be made by mandamus. … the estimate made by the board of counts' commissioners to the excise board under the provisions of section 9695, C.

Western Paint & Chemical Co. v. Board of Com'rs

161 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1933

In Board of Com’rs v. … Board of County Com’rs v. Seawell, supra. It is not sufficient that the services performed without authority for which payment was demanded are beneficial to the county. Board of Com’rs v.

Chickasaw Lumber Co. v. Board of Com'rs

173 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1935

Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, 125 Okla. 226 , 257 P. 324 ; Board of County Commissioners of Carter County v. Landrum, 163 Okla. 199 , 21 P. (2d) 736 . … Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, 171 Okla. 302 , 42 P. *198 (2d) 533. We see no reason for departing from tire rule announced therein. Judgment affirmed. McNEILL, O. J., OSBORN, V. O.