Case law

Buohl v. Board of Commissioners

89 N.J.L. 378 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 18, 1916

Vroom v. Board of Education

79 N.J.L. 46 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 8, 1909

of a teacher, binding upon every subsequent board. … App. 109 ); in Iowa (Jessup v. Chicago, &c., R. Co., 82 Iowa 243 ), and in Kentucky (Louisville, &c,., R. Co. v. Offutt, 99 Ky. 4217 ).

George v. Board of Education

34 F. Supp. 3d 442 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 23, 2014

Under Monell v. … Gant v.

IAPPELLI v. Board of Review

200 N.J. 547 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 11, 2009

985 A.2d 646 (2009) 200 N.J. 547 IAPPELLI v. BOARD OF REVIEW. No. C-419 September Term 2009, 064432 Supreme Court of New Jersey. December 11, 2009. Petition for Certification Denied.

Sayre v. Board of Excise

81 N.J.L. 79 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 10, 1911

The power conferred upon the board of excise commissioners is the same as conferred upon the boards of commissioners under the act of 1902. Pamph. L., p. 628. It was held, in Sexton v. … Board of Excise Commissioners, 47 Vroom 102 , that the latter boards in granting licenses were limited by the provisions of the Inn and Tavern act. The same doctrine was applied in the case of Reed v.

Stockton v. Board of Education

72 N.J.L. 80 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1905

third section, be subject to appeal to the state board of education. … Jefferson v. Board of Education, 35 Vroom 59; Draper v. Commissioners of Public Instruction, 37 Id. 54. The rule to show cause is discharged.

Brambila v. Board of Review

241 N.J. Super. 216 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 8, 1990

Super. 216 (1990) 574 A.2d 992 CAROLINA BRAMBILA AND MARIO BRAMBILA, CLAIMANTS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. … Esparza, supra; Sudomir v. McMahon, 767 F. 2d 1456 (9th Cir.1985). Holley v.

Driscoll v. Board of Education

165 N.J. Super. 241 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 18, 1977

Parkview Village Asso. v. Bor. of Collingswood, 6 2 N. J. 21, 34 (1972); Close v. Kordulak Bros., 44 N. J. 589, 599 (1965). However, as stated in Biancardi: * * * As in Schulz [Schulz v. … See Fanwood v. Rocco, 59 N. J. Super. 306, 315 (App. Div.), aff’d 33 N. J. 404 (1960) ; Kopera v. West Orange Bd. of Ed., 60 N. J. Super. 288, 296 (App. Div. 1960). As was said in Mayflower Securities v.

Simon v. Board of Trustees

233 N.J. Super. 186 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 10, 1989

SIMON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted December 5, 1988. … NOTES [1] The other two cases are Koschker v. Board of Trustees, Police and Firemen's Retirement System, 233 N.J. Super. 209 (App. Div. 1989), and Allen v.

George v. Board of Excise

74 N.J.L. 816 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 17, 1907

Moran v. Jersey City, 29 Vroom 653 ; Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co. v. Newark, 34 Id. 310; Morris & Cummings Dredging Co. v. Jersey City , 35 Id. 587; Suburban Land Co. v. … Vailsburg, 39 Id. 311; Yellow Pine Co. v. Board of Assessors, 43 Id. 182. The testimony before the Supreme Court was competent and certainly did not compel any other conclusion than that reached by the court.

Schuenemann v. Board of Review

208 N.J. Super. 48 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 4, 1986

SCHUENEMANN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW AND UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted January 14, 1986. … See McKay v. Horn, supra .

Turner v. First Union National Bank

162 N.J. 75 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 9, 1999

In one of the underlying actions, Turner v. First Union Nat'l Bank (“Turner ”), the petitioner was unrepresented. In Iversen v. Collective Bank (“Iverson ”) and Kelly v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. … State v. Gill, 47 N.J. 441, 444 , 221 A.2d 521 (1966); State v. Campobasso, 125 N.J.Super. 103, 108 , 308 A.2d 674 (Law Div.1973).

Schmid v. Board of Review

201 N.J. 153 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 21, 2010

988 A.2d 1177 (2010) 201 N.J. 153 SCHMID v. BOARD OF REVIEW. C-495 September Term 2009, 064761 Supreme Court of New Jersey. January 21, 2010. Petition for Certification Denied.

Rolka v. Board of Review

332 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 13, 2000

Yardville Supply Co. v. Board of Review, 114 N.J. 371, 375 , 554 A. 2d 1337 (1989) (quoting Schock v. Board of Review, 89 N.J.Super. 118, 125 , 214 A. 2d 40 (App. … See Gerber v. Board of Review, 313 *793 N.J.Super. 37, 43-44, 712 A. 2d 688 (App. Div.1998).

Randolph v. Lipscher

641 F. Supp. 767 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 25, 1986

The minority opinions, like the majority, undertook to apply the balancing test of Pickering v. Board of Education, supra and Connick v. … Dubliner v. Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 33 N.J. 428, 435 , 165 A.2d 163 (1960).

Moser v. Board of Commissioners

10 N.J. Misc. 315 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 2, 1932

Paddock v. Hudson Tax Board, 82 N. J. L. 360; Harker v. Bayonne, 85 Id. 176; Colgarry v. Water Commissioners, Ibid. 583; Buckley v. Guttenberg, 87 Id. 434. The purpose of the change here was clearly shown to be economy. … The action of the board of commissioners is affirmed, andi the writ dismissed, with costs.

Daly v. Board of Review

200 N.J. 472 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 1, 2009

983 A.2d 198 (2009) 200 N.J. 472 DALY v. BOARD OF REVIEW. No. C-128 September Term 2009, 64,457 Supreme Court of New Jersey. October 1, 2009. Petition for Certification Denied.

Rosell v. Board of Education

68 N.J.L. 498 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1902

. *499 The first and second reasons assigned for reversal of the tax turn upon the allegation that the members of the board of education, who authorized the special meeting of the voters of the district at which the issue … The case cited to the contrary (Manahan v. Watts, 35 Vroom 465 ) Avas a direct attack upon the right of the claimant himself. This reason has no force.

State v. Board of Education

57 N.J.L. 605 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1895

Now, in respect to the powers of the board of school trustees under the act of 1874. … Packet Co. v. Keokuk, 95 U.

State v. Hakum Brown State v. Rodney Brown (083353) (Essex County, Middlesex County, & Statewide)

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 2021

State v. Hakum Brown; State v. Rodney Brown (A-39-19) (083353) Argued October 14, 2020 -- Decided January 25, 2021 LaVECCHIA, J., writing for the Court. … In 1995, Rodney Brown (R.B.) was convicted of sexual assault. In 2000, Hakum Brown (H.B.) was convicted of sexual assault and endangering the welfare of a child.