Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

0.88s

  • Lehman v. Civil Aeronautics Board Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    209 F.2d 289 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 1954

    This finding, adopted by the Board, we think is accurate. … Compare Gilman v. Jack, Me.1952, 91 A. 2d 207 , involving Section 17 (c) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act, supra. See, also, Rattner v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Polen v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

    466 A.2d 464 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1983

    Perry v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 451 A.2d 88 , 89 n. 3 (D.C.1982), quoting Hawkins v. … In general, disability retirements cost the P & F program approximately 30 percent more than do optional retirements (66% percent v. 50 percent of base pay).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jochims v. National Labor Relations Board

    480 F.3d 1161 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 2007

    to the Court’s decision in NLRB v. … In its Supplemental Decision, however, the Board expressly retreated from any discussion of or reliance on NLRB v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • McNeal v. Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

    488 A.2d 931 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1985

    See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Dodge v. Board of Education, 302 U.S. 74 , 58 S.Ct. 98 , 82 L.Ed. 57 (1937); American Postal Worker’s Union v. … Richardson v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Charles R. Brown, (2 Cases)

    663 F.2d 229 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 1981

    United States v. Brown, No. 77 — 2106 (D.C.Cir., Mar. 21, 1980). Rule 12(f), Fed.R.Crim.P. provides: Effect of Failure to Raise Defenses or Objections. … United States v. Smith, 179 U.S.App.D.C. 162, 168 , 551 F.2d 348, 354 (1976); United States v. Moore, supra; United States v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Hickenbottom v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

    273 A.2d 475 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 1971

    The Board affirmed the appeals examiner’s decision without modification. … Gregory v. Anderson, 14 Wis.2d 130 , 109 N.W.2d 675, 679 (1961). 10 . Milwaukee Transformer Co. v. Indus. Comm’n., 22 Wis.2d 502 , 126 N.W.2d 6, 12 (1964). 11 . Woodridge Nursery School v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Patrick Broom a/k/a Patrick Brown v. United States

    118 A.3d 207 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2015

    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 13-CF-1423 PATRICK BROOM A/K/A PATRICK BROWN, APPELLANT, V. … Brown, 632 N.E.2d 970, 971-73 (Ohio Ct.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown Instrument Co. v. Warner Register of Copyrights

    161 F.2d 910 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1947

    We agree with the court that the opinion of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Taylor Instrument Companies v. … We think, moreover, that the case is controlled by Baker v. Selden, 101 U.S. 99 , 25 L.Ed. 841 . That case involved blank forms for use in bookkeeping.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Lee's Summit v. Surface Transportation Board

    231 F.3d 39 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 2000

    United States v. Larionoff, 431 U.S. 864, 872 (1976); Bluestone Energy Design, Inc. v. FERC, 74 F.3d 1288, 1292 (D.C. … Improve- ment of existing track does not constitute "construction," and does not even trigger Board jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. s 1091. City of Detroit v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. National Transportation Safety Board

    660 F.3d 476 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 2011

    Before: ROGERS, GARLAND and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS. … It recited the applicable standard to prove intentional falsification, as set forth in Board precedent based on Hart v. McLucas, 535 F.2d 516, 519 (9th Cir. 1976).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Childs v. United States Board of Parole

    371 F. Supp. 1246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 17, 1973

    Certain it is that the Supreme Court via a footnote quoting Bey v. … Contra, Scarpa v. U. S. Board of Parole, 477 F.2d 278 (CA5 1973).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

    377 A.2d 436 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1977

    [Consolidated Edison v. N.L.R.B., 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938).] See Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, supra at 179. … Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516, 518 (1973).

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. National Mediation Board

    607 F. Supp. 113 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 1985

    See Delpro v. … Board pursuant to a validly issued delegation order. 2 . International Longshoremen’s Association v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Walter Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Bowles

    58 F. Supp. 323 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 1944

    Sterling v. Constantin, 1932, 287 U. … Steuart & Bro. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alton R. Co. v. Railroad Retirement Board

    16 F. Supp. 955 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1936

    v. … In Hepburn v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Reynolds v. U.S. Capitol Police Board

    357 F. Supp. 2d 2 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2004

    Thompson v. Capitol Police Board, 120 F.Supp.2d 78, 81 (D.D.C.2000). … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.Cir.1985); see also Simpkins v. WMATA, 1997 WL 702349 , at *2 (D.C.Cir. Oct.10, 1997).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Wells v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

    449 A.2d 1079 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1982

    Coakley v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 370 A.2d 1345, 1349-50 (1977); Seabolt v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, supra at 910-11. Petitioner cites Torvik v. … In Seabolt v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Una Chapter v. National Mediation Board

    294 F.2d 905 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 13, 1961

    294 F.2d 905 111 U.S.App.D.C. 121 UNA CHAPTER, FLIGHT ENGINEERS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, Appellant, v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD, Francis A. … The purpose of the Board (and similarly of its designated Committee) is to find facts. See Switchmen's Union v. N.M.R., supra at page 301 of 320 U.S., at page 97 of 64 S.Ct.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • O'Carroll v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    144 F.2d 993 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 9, 1944

    the preliminary findings gave testimony at the Board’s hearing. … The order of the Board will be Affirmed. 49 U.S.C.A. § 646 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McDuffie v. D.C. Board of Elections

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 2022

    McDuffie, the Board, and intervenor/challenger Bruce V. Spiva, was held on April 27, 2022. … See District of Columbia v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.