Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.88s
Lehman v. Civil Aeronautics Board Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
209 F.2d 289 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 1954
This finding, adopted by the Board, we think is accurate. … Compare Gilman v. Jack, Me.1952, 91 A. 2d 207 , involving Section 17 (c) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act, supra. See, also, Rattner v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPolen v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board
466 A.2d 464 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1983
Perry v. Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 451 A.2d 88 , 89 n. 3 (D.C.1982), quoting Hawkins v. … In general, disability retirements cost the P & F program approximately 30 percent more than do optional retirements (66% percent v. 50 percent of base pay).
Cited 3 timesPublishedJochims v. National Labor Relations Board
480 F.3d 1161 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 2007
to the Court’s decision in NLRB v. … In its Supplemental Decision, however, the Board expressly retreated from any discussion of or reliance on NLRB v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedMcNeal v. Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board
488 A.2d 931 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1985
See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Dodge v. Board of Education, 302 U.S. 74 , 58 S.Ct. 98 , 82 L.Ed. 57 (1937); American Postal Worker’s Union v. … Richardson v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States v. Charles R. Brown, (2 Cases)
663 F.2d 229 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 1981
United States v. Brown, No. 77 — 2106 (D.C.Cir., Mar. 21, 1980). Rule 12(f), Fed.R.Crim.P. provides: Effect of Failure to Raise Defenses or Objections. … United States v. Smith, 179 U.S.App.D.C. 162, 168 , 551 F.2d 348, 354 (1976); United States v. Moore, supra; United States v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedHickenbottom v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board
273 A.2d 475 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 1971
The Board affirmed the appeals examiner’s decision without modification. … Gregory v. Anderson, 14 Wis.2d 130 , 109 N.W.2d 675, 679 (1961). 10 . Milwaukee Transformer Co. v. Indus. Comm’n., 22 Wis.2d 502 , 126 N.W.2d 6, 12 (1964). 11 . Woodridge Nursery School v.
Cited 35 timesPublishedPatrick Broom a/k/a Patrick Brown v. United States
118 A.3d 207 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2015
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 13-CF-1423 PATRICK BROOM A/K/A PATRICK BROWN, APPELLANT, V. … Brown, 632 N.E.2d 970, 971-73 (Ohio Ct.
Cited 10 timesPublishedBrown Instrument Co. v. Warner Register of Copyrights
161 F.2d 910 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1947
We agree with the court that the opinion of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Taylor Instrument Companies v. … We think, moreover, that the case is controlled by Baker v. Selden, 101 U.S. 99 , 25 L.Ed. 841 . That case involved blank forms for use in bookkeeping.
Cited 12 timesPublishedLee's Summit v. Surface Transportation Board
231 F.3d 39 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 2000
United States v. Larionoff, 431 U.S. 864, 872 (1976); Bluestone Energy Design, Inc. v. FERC, 74 F.3d 1288, 1292 (D.C. … Improve- ment of existing track does not constitute "construction," and does not even trigger Board jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. s 1091. City of Detroit v.
Cited 42 timesPublishedCooper v. National Transportation Safety Board
660 F.3d 476 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 2011
Before: ROGERS, GARLAND and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS. … It recited the applicable standard to prove intentional falsification, as set forth in Board precedent based on Hart v. McLucas, 535 F.2d 516, 519 (9th Cir. 1976).
Cited 10 timesPublishedChilds v. United States Board of Parole
371 F. Supp. 1246 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 17, 1973
Certain it is that the Supreme Court via a footnote quoting Bey v. … Contra, Scarpa v. U. S. Board of Parole, 477 F.2d 278 (CA5 1973).
Cited 26 timesPublishedWashington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
377 A.2d 436 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1977
[Consolidated Edison v. N.L.R.B., 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938).] See Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, supra at 179. … Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516, 518 (1973).
Cited 41 timesPublishedInternational Longshoremen's Ass'n v. National Mediation Board
607 F. Supp. 113 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 1985
See Delpro v. … Board pursuant to a validly issued delegation order. 2 . International Longshoremen’s Association v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWalter Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Bowles
58 F. Supp. 323 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 1944
Sterling v. Constantin, 1932, 287 U. … Steuart & Bro. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlton R. Co. v. Railroad Retirement Board
16 F. Supp. 955 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 1936
v. … In Hepburn v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedReynolds v. U.S. Capitol Police Board
357 F. Supp. 2d 2 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2004
Thompson v. Capitol Police Board, 120 F.Supp.2d 78, 81 (D.D.C.2000). … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.Cir.1985); see also Simpkins v. WMATA, 1997 WL 702349 , at *2 (D.C.Cir. Oct.10, 1997).
Cited 9 timesPublishedWells v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board
449 A.2d 1079 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1982
Coakley v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 370 A.2d 1345, 1349-50 (1977); Seabolt v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, supra at 910-11. Petitioner cites Torvik v. … In Seabolt v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUna Chapter v. National Mediation Board
294 F.2d 905 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 13, 1961
294 F.2d 905 111 U.S.App.D.C. 121 UNA CHAPTER, FLIGHT ENGINEERS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, Appellant, v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD, Francis A. … The purpose of the Board (and similarly of its designated Committee) is to find facts. See Switchmen's Union v. N.M.R., supra at page 301 of 320 U.S., at page 97 of 64 S.Ct.
Cited 6 timesPublishedO'Carroll v. Civil Aeronautics Board
144 F.2d 993 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 9, 1944
the preliminary findings gave testimony at the Board’s hearing. … The order of the Board will be Affirmed. 49 U.S.C.A. § 646 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedMcDuffie v. D.C. Board of Elections
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 2022
McDuffie, the Board, and intervenor/challenger Bruce V. Spiva, was held on April 27, 2022. … See District of Columbia v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna