Case law

Brown v. Baldwin

131 Or. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 1994

Defendant responds that, although certain previous decisions, including Fine v. Zenon, 114 Or App 183 , 834 P2d 509 (1992), might support petitioner’s position, those decisions were implicitly overruled by Bartz v. … Bartz v. State of Oregon, supra, 314 Or at 358 , adopts the same construction.

State v. Brown

209 Or. App. 699 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 13, 2006

State v. Holmes, 311 Or 400, 409-10 , 813 P2d 28 (1991). … In State v.

State v. Brown

273 Or. App. 347 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 2015

Cook, 332 Or at 608 (articulating standard); see also State v. Brown, 348 Or 293, 302 , 232 P3d 962 (2010) (same). 4 They do not. … Brown, 348 Or at 301 (citing State v. Pidcock, 306 Or 335, 340-42 , 759 P2d 1092 (1988)).

Dillard v. Brown

363 Or. 744 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 2018

The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Dillard v. Premo, 362 Or. 41 , 403 P.3d 746 (2017). Review Allowed

Chernaik v. Brown

367 Or. 143 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 2020

Chernaik v. Brown, 295 Or App 584, 601, 436 P3d 26 (2019). … Chernaik v. Brown, 367 Or 143, 166, 475 P3d 68 (2020).

Herbring v. Brown

92 Or. 176 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1919

The same word is used in Sections 18 and 19 of Article IV, and Section 15 of Article V, and in the same sense as above indicated. We come now to the term “act,” as used in the Constitution. … from that here discussed, and in all necessary particulars the same in substance, the Supreme Court of that state has hold that the referendum can only be invoked against statutes and not against joint resolutions: Hopping v.

Brown v. Irwin

187 Or. 462 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1949

Bean in Wilkes v. … Bean in State v.

Bayne v. Brown

60 Or. 110 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1911

It is said in Talbot v.

State v. Brown

10 Or. 215 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1882

(McCauley v. Brooks, 16 Cal., 11 ; Smith v. The Controller of the State, 18 Wend., 659 ; People v. Stout, 23 Barb., 339 ; Agricultural Society v. … In Wall v.

Brown v. Hilleary

133 Or. 26 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1930

We are not unmindful of the decision in Sappingfield v. … In Daniel v. Tolon, 53 Okla. 666 ( 157 P. 756 , 4 A. L.

Brown v. Roberts

309 Or. 667 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1990

Petitioners Brown and Peach did not file with the Secretary of State comments and arguments concerning the Attorney General’s draft ballot title. We, therefore, dismiss their petitions for review.

State v. Brown

73 Or. 325 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1914

As said in Carroll v. … E. 537); Olson v. State, 143 Wis. 413 ( 127 N. W. 975); State v. Anderson, 127 La. 1041 ( 54 South. 344 , Ann. Cas. 1912A, 1103); Reismier v. State, 148 Wis. 593 ( 135 N. W. 153 ); State v.

Wolfe v. Brown

294 Or. App. 800 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 15, 2018

Prete v. … See Adams v. Board of Clinical Social Workers , 201 Or. App. 500 , 506, 119 P.3d 260 , rev. den. , 339 Or. 700 , 127 P.3d 1202 (2005) ("The relevance of evidence is a legal question that we review for errors of law.").

Brown v. Comstock, Brown & Alm Co.

101 Or. 418 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1921

Brown, the plaintiff, and E. M. Com-stock performed labor for the defendant Comstock, Brown & Aim Company, a corporation in the manufacture of lumber. … J., and McBride and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Brown

299 Or. 143 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 9, 1985

Brown has some self-interest in taking the stand and wants to say well, he’s on probation and, therefore, there’s self-interest, I think that’s, in effect, overkill, because it’s obviously [sic] he’s got a self-interest. … See State v. Mains, 295 Or 640 , 669 P2d 1112 (1983); State v. Naylor, 291 Or 191 , 629 P2d 1308 (1981); State v. Van Hooser, 266 Or 19 , 511 P2d 359 (1973).

Couey v. Brown

257 Or. App. 434 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 10, 2013

In Gaffey v. … In Brown [v.

Leinenweber v. Brown

24 Or. 548 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1893

The allegation that the defendant Brown had knowledge of and participated in the proceedings with the purpose of obtaining the land at an inadequate and unfair price, is too vague and uncertain to charge fraud; and, besides … Eddy, 4 Or. 225 ; Dolph v. Barney, 5 Or. 191; Wright v. Young, 6 Or. 87 ; McRea v. Daviner, 8 Or. 63 . Affirmed.

State v. Brown

5 Or. App. 412 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 28, 1971

See State v. William D. … ORS 17.215; State v. Clipston, 237 Or 634, 645 , 392 P2d 772 (1964); State v. Weston, 102 Or 102, 113-15 , 201 P 1083 (1921). The conviction is affirmed. ① Subsequent to Miranda v.

Brown v. Siemens

117 Or. 583 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1926

Underwood, 68 Or. 56, 59, 60 ( 169 Pac. 536 ); McFarland v. Carlsbad San. Co., 68 Or. 530 ( 137 Pac. 209 , Ann. Cas. 1915C, 555); Boord v. Kaylor, 100 Or. 366 ( 197 Pac. 296 ); Obermeier v. … Bean, Brown, Belt and Rand, JJ., concur.

State v. Brown

296 Or. 458 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1984

Brown, 296 Or 461 , 676 P2d 877 (1984). … We restricted review in this case and the companion case, State v.