Case law

Brown v. Brown

166 A.D.2d 827 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 25, 1990

Because the stipulation was not merged into the judgment of divorce, it stands as an independent contract (cf., Merl v Merl, 67 NY2d 359, 362 ) and, therefore, should be interpreted in light of the parties’ intent (see, e.g

Brown v. Brown

122 Misc. 714 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1924

(Tirrell v. Tirrell, 232 N. … (Reardon v. Woerner, 111 App. Div. 259 .) In France v. France [ 38 Misc.

Judd v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 2

278 N.Y. 200 · New York Court of Appeals · May 24, 1938

A similar argument was advanced in Smith v. Donahue ( 202 App. Div. 656 ), in State ex rel. Traub v. Brown *213 (supra), and in Williams v. … Traub v. Brown (supra). In the Borden case the minority presented the better-reasoned opinion, in accord with the reasoning in Smith v.

DeSouza-Brown v. Brown

38 A.D.3d 888 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 27, 2007

Rochester, 26 AD3d 387, 388 [2006]; Matter of Kravitz v Kravitz, 18 AD3d 874, 875 [2005]; Matter of Zieran v Marvin, 2 AD3d 870, 872 [2003]; Matter of Cutrone v Cutrone, 225 AD2d 767, 768 [1996]). … v Laland, 4 AD3d 529, 530 [2004]; Matter of Topper v Topper, 271 AD2d 613 [2000]).

Brown v. Brown

122 A.D. 576 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 13, 1907

Brown, the widow of the decedent, as trustee of an express trust, she being a beneficiary, was valid. The firm, name of the copartnership was Brown & Seccomb. … Brown and "William Harold Brown in the said firm, except their special capital contributed as aforesaid, and any increase and interest due thereupon, shall cease.”

Brown v. Brown

143 A.D.2d 248 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 29, 1988

Although the right of recovery for the alleged improper actions of the plaintiff belongs to the corporation, the claims can be brought in the defendant Leila Brown’s name (see, e.g., Bertoni v Catucci, 117 AD2d 892 ; Conant … v Schnall, 33 AD2d 326 ).

Brown v. . Brown

41 N.Y. 507 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1869

Brown, should be charged with the payment of all the debts of the testator. 2d. … The case of Hoes v. Van Hoesen (1 Comst., 120), is in harmony with this view.

Brown v. Brown

192 A.D.2d 689 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 26, 1993

. & Loan Assn. v Gottlieb, 90 AD2d 766 ). … v New York Cent.

Brown v. Brown

282 A.D. 726 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 22, 1953

(Smith v. Smith, 364 Pa. 1 ; Commonwealth ex rel. Achter v. Achter, 167 Pa. Super. Ct. 603 ; Commonwealth ex rel. Branch v. Branch, 170 Pa. Super. Ct. 45 ; see Caldwell v. Caldwell, 298 N. Y. 146 ; Querze v. … (Landsman v. Landsman, 302 N. Y. 45 ; Fischer v. Fischer, 254 N. Y. 463 .)

Brown v. Brown

236 A.D.2d 611 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 24, 1997

. *612 Although this Court’s authority is as broad as that of the trial court in custody matters (see, Young v Young, 212 AD2d 114, 117 ; Matter of Rosiana C. v Pierre S., 191 AD2d 432, 433 ), the general rule is that custody … for the hearing court, the determination of which is based upon a "firsthand assessment of the parties, their credibility, their character, and temperaments”, and should be accorded great deference (Matter of Krebsbach v

Fletcher v. Harrington (In re Soundview Elite Ltd.)

512 B.R. 155 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 23, 2014

Green v. … Etheredge-Brown v. Am. Media, Inc., 13 Civ.l982(JPO), 2014 WL 1316352, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2014) (citing Greenwood v. State of N.Y. Office of Mental Health, 842 F.2d 636, 639 (2d Cir.1988)).

Brown v. Brown

51 Misc. 2d 839 · New York City Family Court · Oct 27, 1966

(See Bracy v. Bracy, 167 Misc. 253 ; England v. England, 205 Misc. 645 .) … (Andrews v. Andrews, 185 Misc. 970 .) Thus, there is liability on the respondent, both in law and in morals to support these children, the issue of their marriage.

Brown v. Brown

31 N.Y.S. 650 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1894

Mills v. Mills, 115 N. Y. 85 , 21 N. E. 714 . Mr. … Lammer v. Stoddard, 103 N. Y. 673 , 9 N. E. 328 . The whole doctrine is tersely stated in the headnote to the case of Kane v.

Franklin v. Krause

32 N.Y.2d 234 · New York Court of Appeals · May 3, 1973

In Franklin v. … But in Abate v. Mundt, 403 U.

Brown v. Brown

34 A.D.2d 727 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 9, 1970

(People v. De Renzzio, 19 N Y 2d 45, 50-51; People v. Friola, 11 N Y 2d 157, 159; Von Diezleski v. Food Fair Stores, 18 A D 2d 724.)

Marin-Brown v. Brown

79 A.D.3d 1302 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 9, 2010

AD3d 1008, 1009 [2007], quoting Curtis v Curtis, 20 AD3d 653, 654 [2005]; see Christian v Christian, 42 NY2d 63, 71 [1977]; accord Smith v Smith, 75 AD3d 784, 786 [2010]). … v Lounshury, 300 AD2d 812, 814 [2002]).

Brown v. Brown

55 Misc. 2d 174 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1967

Where, as here, a wife has been abandoned by her husband and left to her own resources, she may acquire a separate domicile for all purposes, including divorce (“Castellani” v. … Capaldo v. Capaldo, 263 App. Div. 984 , app. den. 264 App. Div. 755 ; see, also, 1 Foster-Freed, Law and The Family, § 5:15; and Ann. 39 A. L.

Kleiger-Brown v. Brown

306 A.D.2d 482 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 23, 2003

Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 93 NY2d 343, 349 [1999] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Ryan v New York Tel. … Corp. v Lopez, 46 NY2d 481, 485 [1979]). Here, the father’s contention with respect to child support was determined in a prior appeal (see Brown v Brown, 239 AD2d 535 [1997]).

Brown v. Brown

1 Barb. Ch. 189 · New York Court of Chancery · Oct 7, 1845

I had occasion to examine that question in the recent case of Vroom v. … (a) In Whyte, adm’r <j-e. v, Rose, (3 Ad. cf- El. N.

Brown v. Brown

203 A.D.2d 912 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 1994

Consequently, plaintiff has no claim to a share of the appreciation (see, Price v Price, 69 NY2d 8, 18 ; Robertson v Robertson, 186 AD2d 124 ).