Case law

Brown v. Brown

261 Iowa 591 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 9, 1968

Jensen v. Jensen, 237 Iowa 1323, 1324 , 25 N.W.2d 316, 317 ; York v. York, 246 Iowa 132, 135, 136 , 67 N.W.2d 28, 33 ; Smith v. Smith, 257 Iowa 584, 589 , 133 N.W.2d 677, 680 . … York v. York, supra. Blundi v. Blundi, 243 Iowa 1219, 1226 , 55 N.W.2d 239, 241 ; Bennett v. Bennett, 200 Iowa 415, 417 , 203 N.W. 26 .

State Ex Rel. Zier v. Chesapeake Beach Railway Co.

98 Md. 35 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 4, 1903

Wonder v. B. & O. R. R. Co., 32 Md. 418 ; State, use of Hamlin v. Malster & Reaney, 57 Md. 287 ; Mayor, &c., Balto., v. War, 77 Md. 593 . … Co. v. State, use of Nelson, 82 Md. 293, we have a different situation presented.

Brown v. Brown

159 Ga. 323 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Nov 12, 1924

Swearingen v. Swearingen, 19 Ga. 265 ; Carlton v. Carlton, 44 Ga. 216 ; Smith v. Smith, 125 Ga. 384 ( 53 S. E. 958 ).

Brown v. Brown

101 So. 2d 135 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jun 15, 1957

Putnam v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

290 Or. App. 436 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 22, 2018

The preservation requirements established in ORAP 5.45(1) apply to review of a board final order. Larsen v. Board of Parole , 206 Or.App. 353 , 366, 138 P.3d 16 (2006). … State v.

Brown v. Brown

41 Cal. 88 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1871

.: The plaintiff having brought an action against her then husband, one George Brown, obtained a decree of divorce from him upon the ground of extreme cruelty. He seems content with the decree, and does not- appeal. … Brown, a brother of George Brown (who was, therefore, made a defendant, and is the sole appellant here), in trust for George, who is alleged to be the true owner, etc.

Brown v. Brown

276 Ala. 153 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 16, 1964

Goodman v. McMillan, supra. … Johnson v.

Brown v. Brown

49 S.D. 167 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1925

Keyes v. Baskerville, 41 S. D. 214, 170 N. W. 143 . We will consider first the matter of the appeal from the judgment.

Brown v. Brown

9 La. Ann. 310 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 15, 1854

In the case of Ross v. Pagoud, 2 L.

Brown v. Brown

68 Utah Adv. Rep. 30 · Court of Appeals of Utah · Oct 21, 1987

Three children were born to the Browns; all of whom are still minors at the time of this appeal. Defendant is a physician with a practice located in Salt Lake City. … These facts are insufficient to impute a timeliness issue in accordance with Klein v. Klein, 544 P.2d 472, 476 (Utah 1975). Neither do these facts give rise to estoppel.

Sharron Motor Lines, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission

633 F.2d 1115 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 5, 1981

After Sharron’s application for permanent authority was denied by the Commission’s joint board on January 25, 1978, we issued our opinion in Barnes Freight Line, Inc. v. … As we stated with respect to another federal agency in Mary Carter Paint Co. v. FTC, 333 F.2d 654 , 660 (5th Cir. 1964) (Brown, J., concurring): Our complex society now demands administrative agencies.

Brown v. Brown

2 Ala. App. 461 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1911

Brown seeks to recover the possession or custody of a minor child about 3 1-2 years of age, Eugene Brown, Jr., by name, who is in the custody of his mother, Mataline Brown; the petitioner being a paternal grandparent of the … Saunders v. Saunders, 166 Ala. 351 , 52 South. 310 .

Brown v. Brown

377 So. 2d 438 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1980

377 So.2d 438 (1979) Karen Townsend BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald R. BROWN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 13967. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. October 30, 1979. Rehearing Denied December 12, 1979. … Citing Kresteff v. Kresteff, 79 Ill.App.2d 170 , 223 N.E.2d 720 (1967); Jackson v. Jackson, 200 A.2d 380 (D.C.App.1964); Osborne v. Osborne, 215 Va. 205 , 207 S.E.2d 875 (1974); Bates v.

In re Pers. Restraint of Arntsen

Washington Supreme Court · Feb 29, 2024

State v. Eastmond, 129 Wn.2d 497, 500, 919 P.2d 577 (1996) (effectively overruled on other grounds by State v. Brown, 147 Wn.2d 330, 340, 58 P.3d 889 (2002)). … See State v. Ward, 125 Wn.

Brown v. Brown

104 Okla. 206 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1924

Co. v. Collins, 47 Okla. 761 , 150 Pac. 142 ; Allison v. Bryan, 50 Okla. 677 , 151 Pac. 610 ; Badger Oil Co. v. Clay, 83 Okla. 25 , 200 Pac. 433 ; Slick Oil Co. v. Coffey, 72 Okla. 32 , 177 Pac. 915 . … Jantzen v. Emanuel German Baptist Church, 27 Okla. 473 , 112 Pac. 1127 ; Rhone Milling Co. v. Farmers, Etc., Bank, 40 Okla. 131 , 156 Pac. 1095 ; Reynolds v. Hill, 28 Okla. 533 , 114 Pac. 1108 ; Avants v.

Clark v. Clark

815 S.E.2d 772 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · May 2, 2018

Brown v. Brown , 362 S.C. 85 , 90, 606 S.E.2d 785 , 788 (Ct. App. 2004) ; see also Davis v. … Brown v. Brown , 392 S.C. 615 , 622, 709 S.E.2d 679 , 683 (Ct. App. 2011) (alterations by court). The situation here is unlike that in Green . Wife does not allege she and Husband owned more than one trailer.

Brown v. Brown

43 Ind. 474 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1873

Brown, James A. Brown, Charles Brown, and Catharine Brown, guardian, etc. … Brown, James A. Brown, and Charles Brown, had not yet attained to the age of twenty-one years respectively, and were not therefore yet entitled, under said will, to any of the said real estate.

Brown v. Brown

26 So. 3d 1210 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jul 27, 2007

Rosemary Posey Brown (“the wife”) and James Earl Brown (“the husband”) were married on August 10, 1996. … Tibbs v. Anderson, 580 So.2d 1337, 1339 (Ala.1991).

Brown v. Brown

348 So. 2d 699 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 11, 1977

BROWN, Jr. v. Clara W. BROWN. No. 11403. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. July 11, 1977. *700 Walter C. Dumas, Baton Rouge, of counsel for plaintiff-appellant, Albert J. Brown, Jr. Walton J. … Le Goaster v. Lafon Asylum, 159 La. 855 , 106 So. 329 (1925); Kinder v. Scharff, 125 La. 594 , 51 So. 654 (1910); Stark v. Howcott, 118 La. 489 , 43 So. 61 (1907); Newman v.

Brown v. Brown

2 Md. Ch. 316 · High Court of Chancery of Maryland · Dec 15, 1846

The deed also contains a stipulation that the parties, Brown and wife, “shall and will 'henceforth, during their joint lives, live separate and apart from each other, without any sort of dependance or claim, of the one upon