Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.68s
Boulton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 29, 2021
See Valentine v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. … (quoting Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015)). C.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrush v. State Board of Higher Education
245 Or. 373 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1966
. *375 Our decision here is controlled by Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 US 360 , 84 S Ct 1316 , 12 L ed 2d 377 (1964). … West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 US 624 , 87 L ed 1628, 63 S Ct 1178 , 147 ALR 674 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. State, Department of Corrections
969 F. Supp. 1243 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 8, 1997
Jacobson v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 105 F.3d 1288, 1302 (9th Cir.1997). … Norwood v. Kirkpatrick, 349 U.S. 29, 32 , 75 S.Ct. 544, 546-47 , 99 L.Ed. 789 (1955).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry
131 Or. App. 552 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 7, 1994
In Boise Cascade Corp. v. … A similar jurisdictional question was addressed at length and resolved in Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (A79626), supra.
Cited 5 timesPublishedGambee v. Oregon Medical Board
261 Or. App. 169 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 2014
board orders. … ORS 183.482(8)(c); see Spray v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDam v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
258 Or. App. 39 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 14, 2013
Petitioner, who is serving dangerous offender sentences on 15 counts of first-degree robbery, seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board), ORS 144.335(1), (3), contending … Petitioner contends that the board erred in relying on a psychological evaluation that was based on erroneous information. We agree with petitioner and therefore reverse and remand the board’s order.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 2017
Stogsdill v. Board of Parole, 342 Or 332, 336, 154 P3d 91 (2007) (citing Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 US 209, 224, 125 S Ct 2384, 162 L Ed 2d 174 (2005)); see also Greenholtz v. … Board of Pardons v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedVoelz v. BOARD OF ENGINEERING EXAMINERS, ETC.
37 Or. App. 113 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 1978
We find the Board’s rationale to be adequate for the conclusion. McCann v. OLCC, 27 Or App 487, 493-95 , 556 P2d 973 (1976), rev den (1977). … We held in Stacey v. Board of Accountancy, 26 Or App 541, 544 , 553 P2d 1074 , rev den (1976), that we give weight to the expertise of the Board in evaluating the quality of its licensees.
Cited 5 timesPublishedWeems v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
347 Or. 586 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 4, 2010
Weems v. Board of Parole, 221 Or App 70, 75 , 190 P3d 381 (2008); Roberts v. Board of Parole, 221 Or App 278, 282 , 190 P3d 397 (2008). … See Brumnett v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedOregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 2017
Stogsdill v. Board of Parole, 342 Or 332, 336, 154 P3d 91 (2007) (citing Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 US 209, 224, 125 S Ct 2384, 162 L Ed 2d 174 (2005)); see also Greenholtz v. … Board of Pardons v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHuesties v. Board On Police Standards & Training
95 Or. App. 17 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 1989
Petitioner seeks review of a Board on Police Standards and Training (BPST) order revoking his basic and intermediate police certificates. … OAR 259-10-055(21) provides, in relevant part: “(a) Grounds for Revocation: The Board may deny or revoke the certification of any officer after written notice, and a hearing, if requested, based upon a finding that the officer
Cited 1 timesPublished126 Or. App. 267 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 1994
Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993).
Cited 0 timesPublishedVandever v. State Board of Higher Education
8 Or. App. 50 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 1971
Co. v. Lincoln Co., 232 Or 540 , 376 P2d 422 (1962). … State v. Young, 74 Or 399 , 145 P 647 (1915).
Cited 1 timesPublishedFleming v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
225 Or. App. 578 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 2009
In Severy v. … After Roy, the Supreme Court decided Engweiler v. Board of Parole, 343 Or 536 , 175 P3d 408 (2007).
Reversed in part by Janowski v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 349 Or. 432 (2010)Cited 11 timesPublishedFillinger v. Boeing Co. (In re Fillinger)
290 Or. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 14, 2018
SAIF v. Strubel , 161 Or. … The litigation of this case has been somewhat complicated by the fact that, at the time the board issued its order, our opinion in Brown v. SAIF , 262 Or. App. 640 , 325 P.3d 834 (2014), controlled the analysis.
Cited 2 timesPublished107 Or. App. 378 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1991
PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole order setting his parole release date. He argues that the Board considered the wrong matrix range in deciding not to overrule his minimum sentence. … It also acknowledges that the Board was required to consider the appropriate matrix range in determining whether a minimum sentence should be overridden. See Howard v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSmith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
250 Or. App. 345 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 6, 2012
Tenants v. State Bd. High. … It is essentially labeled as such and explains the board’s hearing procedures and requirements. Cf. Kessler v. OSCI, 26 Or App 271, 274 , 552 P2d 589 (1976), overruled on other grounds by Rutherford v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedEinstein v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
226 Or. App. 39 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 18, 2009
Einstein v. PSRB, 330 Or 121, 127 , 998 P2d 654 (2000). “Substantial evidence exists to support a finding of fact when the record, viewed as a whole, would permit a reasonable person to make that finding.” … Id. at 128 n 4 (noting that PSRB is not required to accept testimony without considering the entire record); Martin v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Sep 25, 2025
BROWN; CAPT. C. BORDEN; SGT. … .”); Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 943 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that “the applicable statute of limitations must be tolled while a prisoner completes the mandatory exhaustion process”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownCriminal Justice Reform Clinic v. Board of Parole
313 Or. App. 592 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 28, 2021
Engweiler v. … Engweiler v. Board of Parole, 343 Or 536, 542 n 5, 175 P3d 408 (2007). 594 Criminal Justice Reform Clinic v. Board of Parole hearing.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna