Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

2.68s

  • Boulton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 29, 2021

    See Valentine v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. … (quoting Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015)). C.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brush v. State Board of Higher Education

    245 Or. 373 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1966

    . *375 Our decision here is controlled by Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 US 360 , 84 S Ct 1316 , 12 L ed 2d 377 (1964). … West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 US 624 , 87 L ed 1628, 63 S Ct 1178 , 147 ALR 674 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State, Department of Corrections

    969 F. Supp. 1243 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 8, 1997

    Jacobson v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 105 F.3d 1288, 1302 (9th Cir.1997). … Norwood v. Kirkpatrick, 349 U.S. 29, 32 , 75 S.Ct. 544, 546-47 , 99 L.Ed. 789 (1955).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry

    131 Or. App. 552 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 7, 1994

    In Boise Cascade Corp. v. … A similar jurisdictional question was addressed at length and resolved in Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (A79626), supra.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Gambee v. Oregon Medical Board

    261 Or. App. 169 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 2014

    board orders. … ORS 183.482(8)(c); see Spray v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dam v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    258 Or. App. 39 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 14, 2013

    Petitioner, who is serving dangerous offender sentences on 15 counts of first-degree robbery, seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board), ORS 144.335(1), (3), contending … Petitioner contends that the board erred in relying on a psychological evaluation that was based on erroneous information. We agree with petitioner and therefore reverse and remand the board’s order.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Haynes v. Board of Parole

    Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 2017

    Stogsdill v. Board of Parole, 342 Or 332, 336, 154 P3d 91 (2007) (citing Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 US 209, 224, 125 S Ct 2384, 162 L Ed 2d 174 (2005)); see also Greenholtz v. … Board of Pardons v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Voelz v. BOARD OF ENGINEERING EXAMINERS, ETC.

    37 Or. App. 113 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 1978

    We find the Board’s rationale to be adequate for the conclusion. McCann v. OLCC, 27 Or App 487, 493-95 , 556 P2d 973 (1976), rev den (1977). … We held in Stacey v. Board of Accountancy, 26 Or App 541, 544 , 553 P2d 1074 , rev den (1976), that we give weight to the expertise of the Board in evaluating the quality of its licensees.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Weems v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    347 Or. 586 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 4, 2010

    Weems v. Board of Parole, 221 Or App 70, 75 , 190 P3d 381 (2008); Roberts v. Board of Parole, 221 Or App 278, 282 , 190 P3d 397 (2008). … See Brumnett v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Haynes v. Board of Parole

    Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 2017

    Stogsdill v. Board of Parole, 342 Or 332, 336, 154 P3d 91 (2007) (citing Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 US 209, 224, 125 S Ct 2384, 162 L Ed 2d 174 (2005)); see also Greenholtz v. … Board of Pardons v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Huesties v. Board On Police Standards & Training

    95 Or. App. 17 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 1989

    Petitioner seeks review of a Board on Police Standards and Training (BPST) order revoking his basic and intermediate police certificates. … OAR 259-10-055(21) provides, in relevant part: “(a) Grounds for Revocation: The Board may deny or revoke the certification of any officer after written notice, and a hearing, if requested, based upon a finding that the officer

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. Board of Parole

    126 Or. App. 267 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 1994

    Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vandever v. State Board of Higher Education

    8 Or. App. 50 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 1971

    Co. v. Lincoln Co., 232 Or 540 , 376 P2d 422 (1962). … State v. Young, 74 Or 399 , 145 P 647 (1915).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fleming v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    225 Or. App. 578 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 2009

    In Severy v. … After Roy, the Supreme Court decided Engweiler v. Board of Parole, 343 Or 536 , 175 P3d 408 (2007).

    Reversed in part by Janowski v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 349 Or. 432 (2010)Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Fillinger v. Boeing Co. (In re Fillinger)

    290 Or. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 14, 2018

    SAIF v. Strubel , 161 Or. … The litigation of this case has been somewhat complicated by the fact that, at the time the board issued its order, our opinion in Brown v. SAIF , 262 Or. App. 640 , 325 P.3d 834 (2014), controlled the analysis.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Board of Parole

    107 Or. App. 378 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1991

    PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole order setting his parole release date. He argues that the Board considered the wrong matrix range in deciding not to overrule his minimum sentence. … It also acknowledges that the Board was required to consider the appropriate matrix range in determining whether a minimum sentence should be overridden. See Howard v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    250 Or. App. 345 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 6, 2012

    Tenants v. State Bd. High. … It is essentially labeled as such and explains the board’s hearing procedures and requirements. Cf. Kessler v. OSCI, 26 Or App 271, 274 , 552 P2d 589 (1976), overruled on other grounds by Rutherford v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Einstein v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    226 Or. App. 39 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 18, 2009

    Einstein v. PSRB, 330 Or 121, 127 , 998 P2d 654 (2000). “Substantial evidence exists to support a finding of fact when the record, viewed as a whole, would permit a reasonable person to make that finding.” … Id. at 128 n 4 (noting that PSRB is not required to accept testimony without considering the entire record); Martin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Edwards v. Brown

    District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 25, 2025

    BROWN; CAPT. C. BORDEN; SGT. … .”); Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 943 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that “the applicable statute of limitations must be tolled while a prisoner completes the mandatory exhaustion process”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Criminal Justice Reform Clinic v. Board of Parole

    313 Or. App. 592 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 28, 2021

    Engweiler v. … Engweiler v. Board of Parole, 343 Or 536, 542 n 5, 175 P3d 408 (2007). 594 Criminal Justice Reform Clinic v. Board of Parole hearing.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.