Case law

Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. Thurman

121 Okla. 108 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1926

In the case of Board of County Com’rs of Logan County v. … Arnold v. Smith, 80 Ind. 417 ; Dubois v. Board of Com’rs of Lake County (Ind. App.) 37 N. E. 1056 .

Boardman Co. v. Board of Com'rs, Ellis Co.

136 Okla. 85 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1929

Board of County Commissioners of Atoka County, 248 Fed. 93 , 160 C. C. A. 233 . In the case of Litchfield v. Ballou. 114 U. … Board of County Commissioners, Day County v. State of Kansas, 19 Okla. 375 , 91 Pac. 699 ; Okla. Moline Plow Co. v. Smith, 81 Okla. 61 , 196 Pac. 962 ; Brown v. Calvert, 57 Okla. 364 , 157 Pac. 284 ; Johnson v.

United States v. Board of County Com'rs

13 F. Supp. 641 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1936

See the opinion of Judge Vaught of 'the Western District, in the case of United States v. Board of Com’rs of Comanche County, Okl. (D.C.) 6 F.Supp. 401 , and the authorities there cited. … Applying the principles announced in Ward v. Board of Com’rs of Love County, Old., 253 U.S. 17 , 40 S.Ct. 419 , 64 L.Ed. 751 , to the facts here, I cannot acquiesce in such contention.

Herndon v. Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc County

158 Okla. 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1932

In said special demurrer defendant raised the statute of limitations as against plaintiff’s cause of action, and in support of defendant’s contention cites the ease of Board of County Commissioners of Woodward County v. … In the case of Board of County Commissioners of Woodward County v. Willett, supra, this court had under consideration the difference between a private and a public right of a county or municipality.

Marcy v. Board of Commissioners of Seminole County

45 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1914

Charity Hosp., 199 Pa. 119 , 48 Atl. 906 ; Patterson v. Winn, 24 U. S. [11 Wheat.] 380, 6 L. Ed. 500 ; Van Reipen v. Jersey City, 58 N. J. Law, 262, 33 Atl. 740 ; State v. Browne, 56 Minn. 269 , 57 N. W. 659 .” … And this court in Stout v.

Federal Tax Co. v. Board of Com'rs

198 Okla. 390 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1947

Foster v. Board of Com’rs. of Marshall County, 144 Okla. 14 , 289 P. 349 , without citing authority, diverged from this rule, but in Jepeway v. … Roth v. Gabbert, 123 Mo. 21 , 27 S.W. 528 .

Western Terra Cotta Co. v. Board of Education

39 Okla. 716 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1913

The defendant Warren-Smith Hardware Company filed its answer and cross-petition, also claiming and asserting a lien upon the premises owned by the said defendant board of education. … The same contention was urged in Hutchinson v. Krueger et al., 34 Okla. 23 , 124 Pac, 591 , 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 315.

Board of Com'rs of Woodward County v. Thyfault

43 Okla. 82 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1914

Overstreet v. City Bank, 12 Okla. 383 , 72 Pac. 379 ; Holt v. Murphy, 15 Okla. 12 , 79 Pac. 275 ; Horn v. Gibson, 24 Okla. 481 , 103 Pac. 563 . … Lieber v. People, 33 Colo. 493 , 81 Pac. 270 ; 13 Cyc. 493; Pollard v. Rebman, 162 Cal. 633 , 124 Pac. 239 .

Allen v. Board of Com'rs of Logan County

131 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 29, 1928

The board is limited in its powers to those specially granted by statute. Allen v. Board of Commissioners of Pittsburg County, 28 Okla. 773 , 116 Pac. 175 ; Garvin County v. … Kellogg v. School District No. 10. Comanche County, 13 Okla. 286 , 74 Pac. 110 ; Harlow v. Board of Commissioners of Payne County. 33 Okla. 353 , 125 Pac. 449 ; Ashton v.

Sappington v. Board of Com'rs of Jefferson County

134 Okla. 253 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1928

Palmer v. Palmer, 36 Mich. 487 . In the case of County Board of Education v. State Board of Education (N. C.) 12 S. … In the case of Board of County Commissioners of Woodward Co. v.

Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City v. Shanbour

435 P.2d 569 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1967

Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa v. Shore, 207 Okl. 381 , 249 P.2d 1011 ; Application of Shadid, supra; Anderson-Kerr v. Van Meter, 162 Okl. 176 , 19 P.2d 1068 . … To support their contention, plaintiffs in error cite Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E. 2d 128 , 168 A.L.R. 1 , and Minney v. City of Azusa, 164 Cal.App.2d 12 , 330 P.2d 255 .

Board of Com'rs v. Enid Springs Sanitarium & Hospital

116 Okla. 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1926

Board of County Commissioners v. Seawell, 3 Okla. 281 , 41 Pac. 592 ; Butler v. Board of County Commissioners, 57 Okla. 748 ; 157 Pac. 912 ; Nolan v. … Board of County Commissioners, 51 Okla. 320 , 152 Pac. 63 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Tulsa Camera Record Co., 103 Okla. 35 , 228 Pac. 1103 .

Chickasaw Lumber Co. v. Board of Com'rs

173 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1935

Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, 125 Okla. 226 , 257 P. 324 ; Board of County Commissioners of Carter County v. Landrum, 163 Okla. 199 , 21 P. (2d) 736 . … Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, 171 Okla. 302 , 42 P. *198 (2d) 533. We see no reason for departing from tire rule announced therein. Judgment affirmed. McNEILL, O. J., OSBORN, V. O.

Oklahoma Farm Bureau v. State Board of Education

444 P.2d 182 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 2, 1968

Chapel v. … Upon authority of Oliver v.

Hughes v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County

50 Okla. 410 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1915

Arnold, 10 Kan. 102 ; Walker v. Fleming, 37 Kan. 171 , 14 Pac. 470 ; Board of Education v. … Fox, 22 Me. 341 ; Allegan v. Chaddock, 119 Mich. 688 , 78 N. W. 892 ; Marney v. State, 13 Mo. 7 ; Board of Education v. Quick, 99 N. Y. 138 , 1 N. E. 533 ; State v. Grizzard, 117 N. C. 105 , 23 S. E. 93 ; Dawson v.

Board of Equalization v. Tulsa Pythian Benevolent Ass'n

195 Okla. 458 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1945

Under these facts it is apparent that the questions here presented are governed by the rule of Oklahoma County v.

Board Com'rs Leflore Cty. v. Central Nat.

171 Okla. 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1935

The question, however, appears to be conclusively settled against the contention of plaintiffs in error in Comstock v. City of Commerce, 100 Okla. 302 , 229 P. 167 . … S. 1931, warrants may be issued to the amount of the estimate made and approved by the excise board for the current fiscal year.

Browning v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety

62 O.B.A.J. 2458 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1991

The state must prove compliance with the applicable rules prescribed by the Board for the administration of a breath test. Westerman v. State, 525 P.2d 1359 (Okl.Cr.1974). … Edwards v. State, 544 P.2d 60 (Okl.Cr.1976).

United Airlines, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

789 P.2d 1305 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1990

See: April v. City of Broken Arrow, Okl., 775 P.2d 1347 (1989); Mattoon v. City of Norman, Okl., 617 P.2d 1347 (1980); Lincoln Income Life Insurance Co. v. Wood, Okl., 556 P.2d 602 (1976); Martin v. Harrah Indep. … Board of Education, Vici Public Schools, Indep. School Dist. No. I-5, Dewey County v. Morris, Okl., 656 P.2d 258, 261 (1982); Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 196 Okl. 633 , 167 P.2d 884 (1946).

Weston v. Board of Governors of State Bar

177 Okla. 467 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1936

Plaintiff cites State Bar of California v. … If he was not a member of the State Bar during his incumbency in office, and if the Board of Governors could not have proceeded against him during hit!