Case law

Poyner v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

456 A.2d 1249 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1983

See Conner v. District of Columbia Bureau of Motor Vehicle Services, 442 A.2d 957 (D.C.1982) (time period began to run when attorney, not party, was served); Valentine v. … See District of Columbia v. Tschudin, 390 A.2d 986 (D.C.1978); In re C.I.T. and C.M.T., 369 A.2d 171 (D.C.1977). In Valentine v.

Federal Trade Commission v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation

778 F.2d 35 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 18, 1985

FTC v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 580 F.Supp. 981 (D.D.C.1983). … See, e.g., Friedman v. Rogers, 440 U.S. 1 , 99 S.Ct. 887 , 59 L.Ed.2d 100 (1979). Both consumers and society have a strong interest “in the free flow of commercial information,” see Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v.

Roberts v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

412 A.2d 47 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1980

In reviewing the Board’s interpretation, this court will give great weight to any reasonable construction of a regulatory statute adopted by an agency charged with enforcing the statute, Coakley v. … Given the humane purpose of the retirement laws, Hyde v. Tobriner, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 311 , 313, 329 F.2d 879, 881 (1964); Crawford v.

Navab-Safavi v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

650 F. Supp. 2d 40 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 3, 2009

Specifically, they argue that Rice did not attend Board meetings or participate in Board business or decisions, and that “there is no plausible basis to infer that Ms. … See 391 U.S. at 564 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 (teacher’s letter to local newspaper criticizing school board funding policies); Perry v.

Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank

373 F. App'x 79 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Brown v. Suburban Propane, LP

367 F. App'x 165 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 556, n. 3 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citation omitted).

Henson v. United States

399 A.2d 16 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1979

In light of Brown’s unavailability, appellant requested that he be provided with a transcript of Brown’s statement before the Board. … [Alston v. United States, D.C.App., 383 A.2d 307, 315 (1978) (citations omitted).] Brown’s testimony before the Board was not given under oath or affirmation.

Dickson v. National Transportation Safety Board

639 F.3d 539 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 2011

. § 706(2)(A); see Chritton v. NTSB, 888 F.2d 854, 856 (D.C. Cir. 1989). The Board’s “[f]indings of fact . . . , if supported by substantial evidence, are conclusive.” 49 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(3). … In determining whether substantial evidence supports the NTSB’s decision, we must accept “reasonable credibility determinations” made by the ALJ and approved by the Board. Throckmorton v.

La Forest v. Board of Commissioners

92 F.2d 547 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 1937

He appealed to the Commissioners of the District, who referred the appeal back to the Board for formal hearing. There was a hearing, and the Board adhered to its former ruling. … There was also a governor and a board of public works.

Frazier v. Merit Systems Protection Board

672 F.2d 150 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 2, 1982

See Dabney v. Freeman, 358 F.2d 533 (D.C. Cir. 1965); Paroczay v. Hodges, 297 F.2d 439 (D.C.Cir.1961); Christie v. U. S., 518 F.2d 584 (Ct.Cl.1975); Myslik v. Veteran’s Administration, 2 MSPB 241 (1980). . … Chapter v. Irving, 610 F.2d 1221 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, sub nom. Assoc. Builders v.

Roberts v. National Transportation Safety Board

776 F.3d 918 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 2015

The FAA sought rehearing, which the Board denied in January 2011. See Administrator v. Roberts, NTSB Order No. EA-5568 (2011), 2011 WL 289248, at *3. … Ass’n of Retired Persons v. EEOC, 873 F.2d 402, 406 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (holding that fee- seekers could gain reimbursement pursuant to the EAJA for their pro bono counsel). The Board expressly recognized this point.

Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank

373 F. App'x 79 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Roberts v. National Labor Relations Board

350 F.2d 427 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 21, 1965

Also see, the National Labor Relations Board, Rules and Regulations Series 8, as amended, Section 102.9. . Hercules Powder Co. v. N. L. R. B., 297 F.2d 424, 433 (C.A.5). . … International Ladies Garment Workers’ Union, AFL-CIO (Bernhard-Altmann) v. N. L. R. B., 366 U.S. 731, 737-738 , 81 S.Ct. 1603 , 6 L.Ed.2d 762 . . 105 Cong.Rec. 6847, 9108 (daily ed.

Tillery v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board

912 A.2d 1169 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2006

Credit Union v. Cumis Ins. … Ass’n v.

Brown v. Suburban Propane, LP

367 F. App'x 165 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 556, n. 3 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citation omitted).

Waters v. United States Capitol Police Board

216 F.R.D. 153 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 6, 2003

. § 1416 (f) (1997), i.e., those made by a hearing officer or the Board of Directors in favor of an employee or by the Board if it has reversed the decision of a hearing officer in favor of an employee. 2 U.S.C.A. § 1416 … Cobell v. Norton, 213 F.R.D. 1, 3-5 (D.D.C.2003).

Collins v. National Transportation Safety Board

351 F.3d 1246 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 19, 2003

(citing Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. Avagliano, 457 U.S. 176, 184–85 (1982)); Hill v. Norton, 275 F.3d 98, 104 (D.C. … Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Rev.

National Labor Relations Board v. Eanet

179 F.2d 15 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 31, 1949

In National Labor Relations Board v. … Co. v. National Labor Relations Board 7 and similar cases.

Pirlott v. National Labor Relations Board

522 F.3d 423 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 2008

Board to reconsider the issue of the adequacy of the Union’s financial disclosure in light of Penrod v. … There is no doubt that the Board may not ignore its prior decisions, LeMoyne-Owen College v. NLRB, 357 F.3d 55, 60-61 (D.C.

Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation Board

325 F. Supp. 1146 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 26, 1971

In Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation v. … V.