Case law

Fair v. State Election Board of Oklahoma

879 P.2d 1223 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 2, 1994

We assume original jurisdiction to consider this matter involving a ruling by the State Election Board and decide the issue whether that portion of Article 5, Section 23 of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma which … Likewise, in Hall v.

Board of Examiners of Veterinary Medicine v. Mohr

485 P.2d 235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1971

Oklahoma State Board of Embalmers etc. v. … Oklahoma State Board of Embalmers, etc. v.

Blue v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin Co.

82 Okla. 178 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1921

Plaintiff in error in his brief concedes that this identical question was decided adversely to him by this court in the case of Allen v. … The is a very important question in the case, and was discussed in the opinion in the case of Alien v. Trimmer, supra.

Huddleston v. Board of Comrs. of Noble Co.

8 Okla. 614 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 24, 1899

not lie to compel the board of county commissioners to perform am act which was expressly forbidden by the statute. … In construing this provision of the constitution, the supreme court of that state, in the case of Weaver v.

Board of County Commissioners v. State Capital Co.

16 Okla. 625 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1906

In the case of Allen and Rixse, v. … In the Allen-Rixse v.

Scott v. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee

100 Okla. 77 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1924

Jackson v. Board of County Commissioners of Garvin County, 66 Okla. 75 , 167 Pac. 227 . … In Kramer v.

Fidelity & Casualty Co. of N. Y. v. Curtis Brown Co.

105 Okla. 136 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1924

Quincy First National Bank v. Hall, 101 U. S. 43 ; Stephens v. Capital Insurance Co., 87 Iowa. 283. … Stephens v- Capital Insurance Co., supra.

Smith v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin County

62 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 2, 1917

Considering the provisions of the foregoing act, in Johnson v. … Parker et al. v. Board of Com’rs of Tillman County, 41 Okla. 723 , 139 Pac. 981 . It follows that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. By the Court: It is so ordered.

Brown v. Cole

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 5, 2025

Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991). … Pahls v. Thomas, 718 F.3d 1210, 1226 (10th Cir. 2013) (quotation omitted).

Gray v. State ex rel. State Election Board

962 P.2d 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1998

Petitioner now challenges the authority of the Board to enforce this provision and the Board’s construction of the statute. ¶ 5 The power and authority of the Board were reviewed in Brickell v. … Hill v. Board of Education, 944 P.2d 930, 933 (Okla.1997). ¶ 12 Section 1404 does not apply to the instant controversy. Because this is so, this Court need not address the Board’s construction of that statute.

Board of Com'rs of Noble County v. Whitney

73 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1918

Anderson v. Board of County Com’rs, 44 Okla. 164 , 143 Pac. 1145 ; Board of Commissioners v. Brett. 32 Okla. 853 , 124 Pac. 57 . … Trimmer v. Rennie, 43 Okla. 152 , 141 Pac. 784 .

School Dist. No. 24 of Rogers Co. v. Brown

54 Okla. 632 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1916

There is, however, a certificate of the clerk of the court, who certifies: “That the above and foregoing is a true and complete copy of the case-made in case No. 415, Civil, Estella Brown v.

John A. Brown Co. v. Oklahoma City General Hospital

187 Okla. 257 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1940

Brown Company is affirmed and as to Standard Accident Insurance Company is reversed and remanded, with directions to enter judgment in favor of said defendant. Affirmed in part and reversed in part, with directions. … J., WELCH, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, and HURST, JJ., concur.

United States v. Board of County Com'rs

13 F. Supp. 641 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1936

See the opinion of Judge Vaught of 'the Western District, in the case of United States v. Board of Com’rs of Comanche County, Okl. (D.C.) 6 F.Supp. 401 , and the authorities there cited. … Applying the principles announced in Ward v. Board of Com’rs of Love County, Old., 253 U.S. 17 , 40 S.Ct. 419 , 64 L.Ed. 751 , to the facts here, I cannot acquiesce in such contention.

Crussel v. Oklahoma State Election Board

497 F. Supp. 646 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1980

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974); Lippitt v. Cipollone, 337 F.Supp. 1405 (N.D.Ohio 1971). … See also, Oklahoma State Election Board v. Coats, 610 P.2d 776 (Okl.1980) (court upheld restriction preventing district attorney from running for office whose term would be at all concurrent with their present office).

Board of Com'rs of Atoka Co. v. Cypert

65 Okla. 168 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1917

Among such cases may be named the following: Huddleston v. Board, 8 Okla. 614 , 58 Pac. 749 ; Board of Commissioners of Garfield County v Bebb et al., 52 Okla. 18 , 152 Pac. 595 ; Smith v. … With the single exception of the 'Supreme Court of Nebraska (Brown v.

Federal Tax Co. v. Board of Com'rs

198 Okla. 390 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1947

Foster v. Board of Com’rs. of Marshall County, 144 Okla. 14 , 289 P. 349 , without citing authority, diverged from this rule, but in Jepeway v. … Roth v. Gabbert, 123 Mo. 21 , 27 S.W. 528 .

Western Terra Cotta Co. v. Board of Education

39 Okla. 716 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1913

The defendant Warren-Smith Hardware Company filed its answer and cross-petition, also claiming and asserting a lien upon the premises owned by the said defendant board of education. … The same contention was urged in Hutchinson v. Krueger et al., 34 Okla. 23 , 124 Pac, 591 , 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 315.

Wentz v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln Co.

147 Okla. 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 23, 1930

Mosier, as Members of and Constituting the Board of County Commissioners of Lincoln County, Okla., Plaintiffs in Error, v. … J., LESTER, V. C. J., and HUNT, RILEY, HEFNER, and OULLISON, JJ„ concur. CLARK:, J., absent. ANDREWS, J., disqualified and not participating.

Marcy v. Board of Commissioners of Seminole County

45 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1914

Charity Hosp., 199 Pa. 119 , 48 Atl. 906 ; Patterson v. Winn, 24 U. S. [11 Wheat.] 380, 6 L. Ed. 500 ; Van Reipen v. Jersey City, 58 N. J. Law, 262, 33 Atl. 740 ; State v. Browne, 56 Minn. 269 , 57 N. W. 659 .” … And this court in Stout v.