Case law

Brown v. Division of Employment Security

320 S.W.3d 748 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 2010

Hoover v. Community Blood Ctr., 153 S.W.3d 9, 12 (Mo.App. … See Self v. Midwest Orthopedics Foot & Ankle, P.C., 272 S.W.3d 364, 369-70 (Mo.App. W.D.2008) (quoting Mo. Comm'n on Human Rights v. Red Dragon Rest., Inc., 991 S.W.2d 161, 167 (Mo.App. W.D.1999)).

Cozart v. Board of Education

249 S.W.3d 922 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 2008

The Commission adopted the decision of the administrative law judge, denying workers’ compensation benefits for an injury the claimant contends he suffered in August 2003 while working in a warehouse for the Board of Education

Brown Motor Sales Co. v. Daugherty

232 Mo. App. 951 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1937

The opinion in the case of McCormick Harvesting Co. v. Hill, 104 Mo. … As pointed out in the case of White v. Grace, 192 Mo.

Brown v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

317 S.W.2d 651 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1958

Berryman v. Southern Surety Co., 285 Mo. 379 , 227 S.W. 96 ; McKeon v. National Casualty Co., 216 Mo.App. 507 , 270 S.W. 707 . Any statements of this court to the contrary in Mayhew v. … Fetter v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 174 Mo. 256 , 73 S.W. 592 , 61 L.R.A. 459 ; Elbe v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., Mo.App., 155 S.W.2d 302 ; Hughes v. Provident Mut. Life Ins.

Brown v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc.

211 S.W.3d 145 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 2007

Zakibe v. Ahrens and McCarron, Inc., 28 S.W.3d 373, 388 (Mo.App.2000). Brown’s brief contains no points relied on. … Brown’s brief contains no list of authorities on which he relies. “The requirements of Rule 84.04(d) are mandatory and must be strictly applied.” Martin v. Circuit Court of the City of St.

Henderson v. Brown Electrical Supply Co.

555 S.W.2d 635 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1977

Co. v. Marable, 189 Ind. 278 , 126 N.E. 849, 850 (1920); Robinette v. Hubbard Coal Mining Co., 88 W.Va. 514 , 107 S.E. 285, 287 (1921); Watcham v. … Henderson accepted compensation from Brown with the knowledge that Brown considered that the payments completely covered the work he did for Cook. Cf. Rodgers v. Seidlitz Paint and Varnish Company, supra.

Brown v. Frankcrum 1, Inc.

370 S.W.3d 932 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 2012

Edward Brown (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him unemployment benefits on the ground that' he was discharged for misconduct connected with his work. … In light of the Supreme Court’s recent holding in Fendler v.

Brown v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.

838 S.W.2d 148 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1992

West v. Jacobs, 790 S.W.2d 475, 479 (Mo.App.1990). … Brown cites Schmidt v. Utilities Ins.

Anderson v. Township Board

75 Mo. 57 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1881

The proceedings before the township board are not to be found in the record before us, and it is, therefore, impossible for us to say that there was any illegality in said proceedings. … The judgments in two other cases, Roberts v. The Township Board of Myrtle Township, and Wm. H. Anderson v. The Same, were affirmed at the same time and for the same reason as in the foregoing case.

John Deere Plow Co. v. Brown

305 Mo. 182 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 31, 1924

[Blandon v. Martin, 50 Mo. App. 114 .] An execution is not a part of the record proper (Smith v. Moseley, 234 Mo. 486, 489 ) until after it is returned (Sec. 2334, R. … [Patterson v. Fagan, 38 Mo. 70 ; Patterson v. Maryland Insurance Co., 5 Am. Dec. 420 .] II. The issues tendered by the motion called for the determination of questions of title and possibly of fraud.

Lueders v. BROWN DOOR ONE, INC.

292 S.W.3d 604 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 22, 2009

The Appellants, Brown Door 1, Inc., f/k/a Loopback, Inc., d/b/a Brick Network (“Loopback”) and Daniel O’Sullivan (“O’Sullivan”), (collectively “Tenants”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment and order of their trial de

Brown v. Shawneetown Feed & Seed Co.

730 S.W.2d 587 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 12, 1987

Defendant cites Gardner v. Metropolitan Utilities Dist., 134 Neb. 163 , 278 N.W. 137 (1938); Wood v. Wood, 8 Utah 2d 279 , 333 P.2d 630 (1959); and Hertz v. Advertiser Co., 201 Ala. 416 , 78 So. 794 (1918). … See Fowler v. Park Corp., 673 S.W.2d 749 (Mo. banc 1984). The case is therefore reversed and remanded for a new trial. .

State ex rel. Brown v. Stiff

104 Mo. App. 685 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1904

Austin v. State, 10 Mo. 591 . … State ex rel. v. County Court, 39 Mo. 521 ; State v. Searcy, 20 Mo. 489 ; State ex rel. v. Hudson, 78 Mo. 302 ; State v. Evans, 83 Mo. 322 ; State v. Bixman, 162 Mo. 21, 22 .

State Ex Rel. Green v. Brown

224 Mo. App. 1197 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 1930

Co. v. American Surety Co., 291 Mo. 92 , 236 S. W. 657 ; Charles v. White, 214 Mo. 187 , l. c. 231, 112 S. W. 545 ; Womach v. City of St. Joseph, 201 Mo. 467 , l. c. 480, 100 S. W. 443 .] … In State ex inf. v.

Brown v. Division of Employment Security

973 S.W.2d 199 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 12, 1998

Belle State Bank v. Indus. Comm’n, 547 S.W.2d 841, 846-47 (Mo.App.1977). “Being less suitable does not make the work not suitable.” S.S. Kresge Co. v. … England v. Regan Mktg., Inc., 939 S.W.2d 62, 66 (Mo.App.1997).

Brown v. Lewis

25 Mo. 335 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1857

He made no contract with Brown on the subject of medical service by Brown to be bestowed on the child of Mrs. Sarah Jane Lewis. … (Campbell et al. v. Hood, 6 Mo. 211 ; Hood v. Mathis, 21 Mo. 308 .) In the case of Hood v.

Wilkins v. Board of Regents

519 S.W.3d 526 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 2017

V. … We find Walsh v.

Brown v. New Plaza Pontiac Co.

719 S.W.2d 468 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1986

Proctor at 687 , citing, Pollock v. Brown, 569 S.W.2d 724, 733 (Mo. banc 1978). … See e.g., Pollock v. Brown, 569 S.W.2d 724, 733 (Mo. banc 1978); Ackmann v. Keeney-Toelle Real Estate, 401 S.W.2d 483, 489 (Mo. banc 1966); Parker v. Green, 340 S.W.2d 435, 441 (Mo.App.1960); Walters v.

Brown v. Barrett

75 Mo. 275 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1882

Brown and plaintiffs, in payment of the amount E. J. Brown was to pay for the land. … Brown, and, instead of delivering this deed to E. J. Brown, for convenience it was withheld and plaintiffs conveyed directly to Barrett.

Centerre Bank of Kansas City, N.A. v. Distributors, Inc.

705 S.W.2d 42 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1985

In Fulton National Bank v. … The Browns rely upon Skeels v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., 335 F.2d 846 (3rd Cir.1964) and K.M.C. Co. v. Irving Trust Co., 757 F.2d 752 (6th Cir.1985).