Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersAL

10,000+ results

4.78s

  • Ingram Realty Co. v. Brown

    208 Ala. 455 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 16, 1922

    Moss v. King, 186 Ala. 475 , 65 South. 180 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Slaughter

    196 Ala. 428 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 23, 1916

    Section 1 of the act of 1915 (Local Acts, p. 394), creating a board of revenue for Monroe county, etc., merely creates a board of revenue in lieu of county commissioners, prescribes the duties thereof, and provides for the

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Allied Steel Products Corporation

    273 Ala. 184 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 18, 1962

    The deed to the Board was signed by appellant Zula Miller. The other two appellants are Coy Brown and his wife Thelma, who is a sister of Mrs. Zula Miller. … When the Board deeded the property to appellee, Coy Brown was a member thereof, and he and his wife signed the deed to appellee. At Mrs.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Dixie Highway Express, Inc.

    270 Ala. 46 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 29, 1959

    This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County in favor of the defendant tax payer in an action brought by Brown, as Director of Revenue of Jefferson County, seeking to recover of the

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Harper v. Brown, Stagner, Richardson, Inc.

    845 So. 2d 777 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 6, 2002

    HARPER III v. BROWN, STAGNER, RICHARDSON, INC. Brown, Stagner, Richardson, Inc. v. Rolfe C. Harper III. 1011109 and 1011205. Supreme Court of Alabama. September 6, 2002. *778 Paul V. Lagarde and James H. … The jury returned a verdict in favor of [Brown] and awarded damages of $113,115.34. The trial court entered a judgment on that verdict." Harper Sales Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • WHEELER, LACEY & BROWN, INC. v. Baker

    269 Ala. 293 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 28, 1959

    The complaint consists of one count which alleges, in substance, the following: That the defendants Miree were the owners and defendant Wheeler, Lacey & Brown, Inc., a corporation, “was the agent *294 with charge and control … Co. of Tennessee v. Porterfield, 239 Ala. 148, 150-151 , 194 So. 173 , *295 supra; Cairnes v. Hillman Drug Co., 214 Ala. 545, 548 , 108 So. 362 ; Spangler v. Hobson, 212 Ala. 105, 106 , 101 So. 828 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Brown v. Handley

    628 So. 2d 726 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jul 9, 1993

    Motley v. Motley , 505 So.2d 1228 (Ala.Civ.App. 1986). … Mann v. Mann , 550 So.2d 1028 (Ala.Civ.App. 1989).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown-Service Ins. Co. v. Wright

    32 Ala. App. 578 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1946

    Mattie Wright, as beneficiary of an insurance policy issued by the Brown-Service Insurance Company on the life of Herman J. … In Einstein, Hirsch & Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Billy Marlar Chevrolet, Inc.

    381 So. 2d 191 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 14, 1980

    Jury List Challenge Because Brown waited until after the trial to challenge the master jury list, we hold that, under the facts of this case, he has now waived that right. This Court held in Williams v. … Fulwider v. Jacob , 221 Ala. 124 , 127 So. 818 (1930). Without setting it out, the evidence clearly shows that Brown's counsel, with due diligence, could have found out how the master jury list was compiled.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Interstate Building & Loan Ass'n v. Brown

    128 Ala. 462 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1900

    Asso. v. Anniston Loan & Trust Co. 101 Ala. 582 ; Sheldon v. Birmingham B. & L. Asso., 121 Ala. 278 ; Johnson v. B. & L. Asso. 126 Ala. 672 . … derives its powers from another State does not affect the question since the right of foreign associations of this character to do business here upon compliance with the conditions prescribed by law is recognized. — Eslava v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mills v. Hobbs

    224 So. 3d 653 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Mar 29, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Pittsburgh L. & T. Co.

    10 Ala. App. 614 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1914

    Board, 117 Ala. 303 ; 23 South. 970 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v. State Board, 80 Ala. 273 , 60 Am. Rep. 99 ; State v. Parker, 5 Ala. App. 235 , 59 South. 741 ; Kansas City R. R. Co. v. … Avhich' the privilege taxed — “doing business in this state” — had been enjoyed, 117 Ala. 311 , 23 South. 970 ; Lott v. Ross, 38 Ala. 156 ; Western Union, Tel. Co. v. Board, 80 Ala. 279 , 60 Am.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. National Motor Fleets, Inc.

    276 Ala. 493 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 13, 1964

    .— Armstrong v. Denver Saunders System Co., 84 Colo. 138, 139 , 268 P. 976 (1928); City of Sioux Falls v. Collins, 43 S.D. 311 , 178 N.W. 950 (1920); People v. … We think the cases of State v. Hotz GMC Trucks, Inc., 268 Ala. 120 , 105 So.2d 98 , and Haden v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • H. H. Daniel Co. v. Brown

    18 Ala. App. 655 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1922

    Finney v. Studebaker Car, 196 Ala. 422 , 72 South. 54 ; Thompson v. Collier, 170 Ala. 469 , 54 South. 493 ; Gray v. Handy, 204 Ala. 559 , 86 South. 548 ; Christie v. Durden, 205 Ala. 571 , 88 South. 667 ; Ray v. … Brown on the car load Of peas; if the peas sold for a larger sum, we were to forward the difference to Mr. Brown, less our commission.”

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • GREEN TREE-AL, LLC v. Brown

    54 So. 3d 404 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jul 16, 2010

    Brown did not file such a motion, and, as a result, the trial court lost jurisdiction at the expiration of the 30 days following entry of the summary judgment. See George v. … T.B. v. T.H., 30 So.3d 429, 433 (Ala.Civ.App.2009). As a result, we have no alternative but to dismiss the appeal. See id.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of Elba

    754 F. Supp. 1551 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 11, 1990

    See also Cannon v. Taylor, 782 F.2d 947, 950 (11th Cir.1986); Wells v. … See Cannon v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown Service Ins. Co. v. King

    247 Ala. 311 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 27, 1945

    Co. v. Litke, 181 Misc. 32 , 45 N.Y.S.2d 576 . In Hunt v. … J., and BROWN and SIMPSON, JJ, concur.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Brown

    27 Ala. App. 602 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1937

    Co. of Providence, R.I. v. Holley, supra: State Life Ins. Co. v. Finney, 216 Ala. 562 , 114 So. 132 . … Georgia Home Insurance Co. v. Allen, 119 Ala. 436 , 24 So. 399 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Phillips v. City of Citronelle

    961 So. 2d 827 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jan 12, 2007

    The ABC Board sent the application to the City for its consideration. … To the extent that State Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Shabani, 819 So.2d 46 , 48 n. 1 (Ala.Civ.App.2000), and City of Montgomery v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United Companies Fin. Corp. v. Brown

    584 So. 2d 470 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 21, 1991

    They cite Danley v. … They also cite Herrington v. Central Soya Co. , 420 So.2d 1 (Ala. 1982). In response, Brown and Holcombe cite Brindley Construction Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.