Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

2.42s

  • Brown v. Brown

    250 S.C. 114 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Aug 22, 1967

    Is the evidence sufficient to establish the charge of physical cruelty to meet the requirement fop a divorce on this ground, as such is defined in the case of Brown v. Brown, 215 S. C. 502, 56 S. E. (2d) 330 , 15 A. L. … McLaughlin v. McLaughlin, supra.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    213 Iowa 998 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Feb 9, 1932

    See In re Estate of Proctor, 95 Iowa 172 ; *1001 Rittgers v. Rittgers, 56 Iowa 218 ; Hamilton v. Hamilton, 149 Iowa 321 ; In re Cooksey’s Estate, 203 Iowa 754, 759 ; Stuart v. Walker, 72 Me. 145 , cited, in Milner v. … Brokhausen, 163 Iowa 560 , 565; Gorham v. Billings, 77 Me. 386 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    32 Conn. App. 907 · Connecticut Appellate Court · Oct 19, 1993

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Brown

    33 N.J. Eq. 650 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1881

    Brown, an equal one-sixth part thereof.” … Clinan v. Cook, 1 Sch. & Lef. 41; Hughes v. Morris, 1 De G., M. & G. 355; Glass v. Hurlburt, 102 Mass. 28 ; Cole v. Potts, 2 Stock. 67 ; Green v. Richards, 8 C. E. Gr. 32; Cutting v. Dana, 10 C. E. Gr. 271.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Ball v. Maynard

    184 N.C. App. 99 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 2007

    Dishner Developers, Inc. v. Brown, 145 N.C. App. 375, 378 , 549 S.E.2d 904, 906 , aff’d per curiam, 354 N.C. 569 , 557 S.E.2d 528 (2001). … Munchak Corp. v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    103 Ind. 23 · Indiana Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1885

    Brown, of the first part, and Elijah C. Brown, of the second part. This is to certify that we, of the first part, did obtain of Elijah C. … Brown.” It is alleged that Solon H.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    196 So. 661 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 1940

    Brown, filed this suit against the defendant, Charles J. … See Fowler v. Smith, 1 Rob. 448 ; Hubbell v. Clannon, 13 La. 494 ; Goldman v. Thomson, 3 La.App. 469 ; Donaldson v. Sheridan, 11 La.App. 498 , 124 So. 193 ; Martin v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    381 Mass. 231 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 30, 1980

    In Lewis v. … Shook v. Crabb, 281 N.W.2d 616 (Iowa 1979). MacDonald v. MacDonald, 412 A.2d 71 (Me. 1980). Imig v. March, 203 Neb. 537 (1979). Merenoff v. Merenoff, 76 N.J. 535 (1978). Digby v. Digby, R.I. (1978). a Coffindaffer v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    2 Or. App. 123 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 26, 1970

    Jensen v. Jensen, 249 Or 423 , 438 P2d 1013 (1968); Feves v. Feves, 198 Or 151 , 254 P2d 694 (1953). … Beaman v. DeShazor, Jr., 197 Or 669 , 255 P2d 157 (1953). Payne v. Payne, 215 Or 412, 414 , 332 P2d 1075 , 335 P2d 606 (1959), states the rule thus: “Beginning with Henderson v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    245 So. 2d 696 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 16, 1971

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Brown

    240 So. 2d 891 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 19, 1970

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Brown

    374 So. 2d 332 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · May 2, 1979

    See also Kiki Undies Corp. v. Promenade Hosiery Mills, Inc. , 308 F. Supp. 489 (S.N.Y. 1969). … F.T.C. v. Packers Brand Meats, Inc. , 562 F.2d 9 (8th Cir. 1977); Hiern v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. , 262 F.2d 526 (5th Cir. 1959).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    676 S.W.2d 519 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 9, 1984

    A dissenting judge transferred the case here because of a jurisdictional problem, certifying conflict with Timmings v. Timmings, 628 S.W.2d 724 (Mo.App.1982). … Our authority is circumscribed by Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    261 Iowa 591 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 9, 1968

    Jensen v. Jensen, 237 Iowa 1323, 1324 , 25 N.W.2d 316, 317 ; York v. York, 246 Iowa 132, 135, 136 , 67 N.W.2d 28, 33 ; Smith v. Smith, 257 Iowa 584, 589 , 133 N.W.2d 677, 680 . … York v. York, supra. Blundi v. Blundi, 243 Iowa 1219, 1226 , 55 N.W.2d 239, 241 ; Bennett v. Bennett, 200 Iowa 415, 417 , 203 N.W. 26 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    214 So. 2d 617 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jul 15, 1968

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Brown

    43 So. 2d 721 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jun 5, 1949

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Brown

    493 So. 2d 671 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Aug 20, 1986

    493 So.2d 671 (1986) Linda Barnes BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Albert BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 17,975-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. August 20, 1986. Arax T. … Louisiana State Board of Medical Exam. v. England, 252 La. 1000 , 215 So.2d 640 (1968).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Williams

    137 Wash. 2d 746 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1999

    As Judge Brown correctly noted: “Mr. … App. at 352 (Brown, J., dissenting).

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    260 So. 3d 851 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Mar 30, 2018

    Brown ("the husband") appeals from a judgment of the Madison Circuit Court ("the trial court") ordering him to begin paying Sinead M. Brown ("the wife") 25% of his monthly military-retirement benefits. … Brown vs. Michael L.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    41 Cal. 88 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1871

    .: The plaintiff having brought an action against her then husband, one George Brown, obtained a decree of divorce from him upon the ground of extreme cruelty. He seems content with the decree, and does not- appeal. … Brown, a brother of George Brown (who was, therefore, made a defendant, and is the sole appellant here), in trust for George, who is alleged to be the true owner, etc.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.