Case law

Darst v. County Election Board of Craig County

194 Okla. 469 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1944

Appellant relies strongly upon Swindall v. State Election Board, 168 Okla. 97 , 32 P. 2d 691 . The case is not in point. … The appellant also calls our attention to Hart v. Jordan, 168 Cal. 321 , 143 P. 537 , Sutphen v. Enking, 39 Idaho, 728 , 230 P. 38 , Morrow v. Wipf, 22 S. D. 146, 115 N. W. 1121 , and Bell v. Hill, 123 Tex. 531 , 74 S.

Hanlon v. Board of Review of Oklahoma

76 O.B.A.J. 814 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 2005

Board decision. … /Board of Review process.

Green v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln County

126 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1927

S. 1921, and chapter 48 of the Session Laws of 1924 — and particularly section 23 thereof — together with Mayberry v. Gaddis, 88 Okla. 286 , 213 Pac. 316 , and Franklin v. … of County Commissioners v.

Board of Com'rs of Coal County v. Mathews

147 Okla. 296 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 1931

(Herndon v. Excise Board of Garfield County, 147 Okla. 126 , 295 Pac. 223 .) … As was said in the case of Board of Commissioners of Delaware County v.

Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. State Insurance Board

173 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1935

See Small v. Comer, 171 Okla. 418 , 43 P. (2d) 716 , for some discussion of exxiert testimony and expert witnesses. … We, therefore, conclude that the petition of protestante to vacate or annul the order of the State Insurance Board should be denied, and it is so ordered. McNEIBL, O. J., OSBORN, V. O.

Lowden v. Excise Board of Jefferson County

182 Okla. 413 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1938

Co. v. Henderson, 107 Okla. 302 , 29 P.2d 768 . The constitutional amendment did not abolish either sinking fund levies or general fund levies. … Co. v. Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P.2d 274 .

Board of Com'rs of Cherokee County v. Hatfield

121 Okla. 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1926

See In re Ccurthouse of Okmulgee Co., 58 Okla. 683 , 161 Pac. 200 ; Ter. v. Neville, 10 Okla. 79 , 60 Pac. 790 ; School Dist. 7 v. Cunningham, 51 Okla. 201 , 151 Pac. 633 ; Parker v. … Co. v. Willis, Co.

Barrett v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County

185 Okla. 111 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1939

We decline to depart from our views as expressed in Board of County Commissioners v. Kiowa National Bank, supra. … Hancock v. Muskogee, 250 U. S. 454 , 63 L. Ed. 1081 , 39 S. Ct. 528 ; Hagar v. Reclamation District, 111 U. S. 701 , 4 S. Ct. 663 , 28 L. Ed. 569 ; Davidson v. Board of Administrators of New Orleans, 96 U. S. 97 , 24 L.

City of Tulsa v. Public Employees Relations Board

845 P.2d 872 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1990

RULING OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS BOARD The Public Employees Relation Board (Board) held a hearing on the Unions’ complaint. … Instead, the Board adopted the “dynamic status quo” principle, a concept which imposes upon the employer the duty to abide by the terms of the expired contract until a new one is agreed upon. See Reed Seismic Co. v.

Board of Comrs. Custer Co. v. De Lana

8 Okla. 213 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

.: This was an action brought in the district court of Custer county by the defendant in error, plaintiff in the court below, against the board of county commissioners of Custer county, to recover a judgment against said … This case comes clearly within the rule laid down in the case of Board v. Hubble, this volume, p. 169, 56 Pac. 1058 , and authorities there cited. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.

Schuman v. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County

184 Okla. 339 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1939

The eases relied on' by the county (Schuman v. Board of County Com’rs of McIntosh County (1933) 163 Okla. 118 , 21 P.2d 40 , and Sinclair Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. … Stults v. Brown (1887, Ind.) 14 N. E. 230 ; Seller v. Lingerman (1865) 24 Ind. 264 ; Jones v. French (1883) 92 Ind. 138 .

Home-Stake Production Co. v. Board of Equalization

416 P.2d 917 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1966

In Board of Equalization Carter County v. … But nearly contemporaneously the Court, in Board of Equalization of Tulsa County v.

Broadwell v. Board of Com'rs of Carter County

71 Okla. 162 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1918

In Board of County Commissioners of Love County v. … Board of County Commissioners v. Ward, Supra.

First National Bank v. Oklahoma Savings & Loan Board

569 P.2d 993 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 27, 1977

In Schroeder v. … Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Chez, 527 P.2d 165, 167 (Okl.1974); In re Alteration of School District Boundaries of Dist. No. 42, 187 Okl. 686 , 105 P.2d 536 (1940). 15 . Brown v.

Dixon v. Board of County Commissioners

221 F. Supp. 3d 1301 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 17, 2016

Plaintiff, an African American woman, was employed as a supervisor with the Oklahoma County Juvenile Board until her termination in 2013. … Carney v. City & Cty. of Denver, 534 F.3d 1269, 1273 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting Baca v. Sklar, 398 F.3d 1210 , 1218 n.3 (10th Cir. 2005)).

Board of Com'rs of Beaver County v. Langston

41 Okla. 715 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1914

The board of county commissioners of Beaver county sued W. PI. … Martin v. Gassert, 17 Okla. 177 , 87 Pac. 586 ; Meyer v. James, 29 Okla. 7 , 115 Pac. 1016 ; Perkins v. Perkins, 37 Okla. 693 , 132 Pac. 1097 ; St. L., I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v.

Brown v. Cole

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 6, 2025

Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991). … Pahls v. Thomas, 718 F.3d 1210, 1226 (10th Cir. 2013) (quotation omitted).

Brown v. Flowers

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Jan 16, 2025

Stat. tit. 12, § 1182). 6 Automax Hyundai S., L.L.C. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., 720 F.3d 798, 804 (10th Cir. 2013) (citing First Bank of Turley v. Fid. & Deposit Ins. … Co., 912 P.2d 861, 865 (Okla. 1996) (citations omitted). 8 Spears v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., 73 P.3d 865, 868 (Okla. 2003). 9 Porter v. Okla. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins.

Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Renshaw

23 Okla. 56 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1909

In Norris v. Haggin, 136 U. S. 386, 10 Sup. Ct. 942, 34 L. Ed. 424 , Mr. … In McClure v.

Board of Com'rs of Creek County v. Robinson

140 Okla. 142 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1929

Board of County Commissioners was somewhat criticized by this court in the recent case of Eaton, Treasurer, v. St. L. & S. F. Ry. … It has been expressly held by this court in the case of Eckles v. Board of County Commissioners of Hughes County.