Case law

Lenox Hill Hospital v. Shalala

131 F. Supp. 2d 136 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2000

Co. v. … Enters. v.

Turner v. National Transportation Safety Board

608 F.3d 12 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 8, 2010

Court’s decision in Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. … It is also consistent with the Board’s treatment of the similarly silent order in Administrator v. Tanner, 4 N.T.S.B. 1354 (1984).

Timmons v. U.S. Capitol Police Board

407 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 2005

To demonstrate causation, the plaintiff must show that the Board would not have denied him a promotion “but for” his filing a complaint with the OC. See Lockamy v. Truesdale, 182 F.Supp.2d 26, 37 (D.D.C.2001); Gregg v. … See Ball v.

Brown v. Ohio National Bank

18 App. D.C. 598 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 1901

Cropley v. Vogeler, 2 App. D. C. 28, 32; Bailey v. District of Columbia, 4 App. D. C. 356, 370; Gleason v. Hoeke, 5 App. D. C. 1, 7; Strauss v. Hensey, 7 App. D. C. 289; Pumphrey v. Bogan, 6 App. D. … Derkes, 103 Ind. 520, 524 ; Price v. Jones, 105 Ind. 543, 545 ; Johnston v. Smith, 86 N. C. 498, 501 ; Van Norman v. Barbeon, 54 Minn. 388, 393 ; Gore v. Mason, 18 Me. 84, 86 ; Lambert v.

Brown v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

6 App. D.C. 237 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1895

Shafer v. Stonebraker, 4 Gill & J. 346, 355; 1 Chitt. Pl. (1st ed.) 386. … Spitze v. Balto. & Ohio Railroad Co., 75 Md. 162, 171 ; Fuller v. B. & O. Employees Relief Assn., 62 Md. 433, 436, 438 ; Owens v. B. & O. Railroad Co., 35 Fed. Rep. 715; Martin v. B. & O. Railroad Co., 41 Fed. Rep. 125.

Stewart v. National Labor Relations Board

851 F.3d 21 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 21, 2017

See SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194, 196-97 , 67 S.Ct. 1760 , 91 L.Ed. 1995 (1947). Perhaps the Board applied Frito-Lay based on a mistaken assumption that the facts here are no different. … LePage’s 2000, Inc. v. Postal Regulatory Comm’n, 642 F.3d 225, 234-35 (D.C. Cir. 2011). The Board’s footnote might be seen to suggest one other possible rationale for ,its decision.

Federal Trade Commission v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

580 F. Supp. 981 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 14, 1983

Complaint ¶ 14, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, No. C 82-0373-L(B) (W.D.Ky.1982). Att. 75 to Gov.Ex. 3. … Brown & Williamson Tobbaco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165 , rehearing and rehearing on banc denied, 717 F.2d 963 (6th Cir.1983). Att. 81 to Gov.Ex. 3.

Board of Elections v. Democratic Central Committee

300 A.2d 725 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1973

Recently this court adopted in Basiliko v. District of Columbia, D.C.App., 283 A.2d 816, 818 (1971), the test set forth in Ballerina Pen Co. v. … V, 1972). 4 . Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727, 734-735 , 92 S.Ct. 1361, 1368 , 31 L.Ed. 2d 636 (1972). 6 . Seripps-Howard Radio v. FCO, 316 U.S. 4 , 62 S.Ct. 875 , 86 L.Ed. 1229 (1942) ; FCC v. Sanders Bros.

Manin v. National Transportation Safety Board

627 F.3d 1239 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 2011

Adm’r v. Wells, 7 N.T.S.B. 1247, 1249 (1991); see also Adm’r v. Peterson, 6 N.T.S.B. 1306, 1307 n.8 (1989). … Our analysis in these cases drew on the Board’s own interpretation of the intent element of intentional falsification. See id. As we noted, the Board declared in Administrator v.

Royster v. Board of Professional Responsibility

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 2, 2010

) GAIL ROYSTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 10-395 (EGS) v. … ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court are the motions to dismiss of defendants Board on Professional Responsibility, Elizabeth A.

Griffin v. Board of Professional Responsibility

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 2, 2010

) CASSIE GRIFFIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 10-396 (EGS) v. … ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court are the motions to dismiss of defendants Board on Professional Responsibility, Elizabeth A.

Scott v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

447 A.2d 447 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1982

See Wheeler v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning, D.C.App., 395 A.2d 85, 88 (1978). We conclude that the Board has borne the burden of demonstrating with substantial evidence that petitioner has recovered. See Kea v. … See Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 320 A.2d 282 (1974).

Simmons v. Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

478 A.2d 1093 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 23, 1984

United States v. Perkins, 633 F.2d 856, 860 (8th Cir.1981) (quoting United States v. Williams, 502 F.2d 581, 583 (8th Cir.1974)); United States v. Gross, 451 F.2d 1355 (7th Cir.1971). … See Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 402-06 , 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1427-30 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971); General Railway Signal Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Bd., 354 A.2d 529 , 531 n. 3 (D.C.1976); Wallace v.

Frederick Powell v. D.C. Parole Board

349 F.2d 715 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 1965

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee Board. … powers of the Board to second offenders committed pursuant to Section 7237 (d).

Board of County Commissioners v. DOT

955 F.3d 96 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 2020

See City of Angels Broad., Inc. v. FCC, 745 F.2d 656, 663 (D.C. Cir. 1984); see also Butz v. Glover Livestock Comm’n Co., 411 U.S. 182, 185 (1973). … Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 52, 53 (1983); U.S. Telecom Ass’n v.

Reed v. U.S. Parole Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2022

) ROBERT REED, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. … Smallwood v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 777 F.

Roddy v. Civil Aeronautics Board

299 F.2d 136 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 1962

Wilhelmina Pope v. Railroad Retirement Board Edwin Thrash v. Railroad Retirement Board

672 F.2d 972 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 12, 1982

See also Gray Panthers v. Schweiker, 652 F.2d 146 (D.C.Cir.1981). … V In summary, the cause is remanded to the district court, which is directed to certify the class as defined above and require the board to notify all of its members of their right to request an oral hearing if they contend

Raymond v. U.S. Capitol Police Board

157 F. Supp. 2d 50 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 26, 2001

See Alholm v. … For example, the plaintiff cites Brown v.

Brown v. National Permanent Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

526 F. Supp. 815 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 1981

See Bustamante v. First Federal Savings and Loan Associa *821 tion, supra, 619 F.2d at 364 ; Harris v. … See Sosa v. Fite, 498 F.2d 114 (5th Cir. 1974); 11 French v. Wilson, 446 F.Supp. 216, 219-220 (D.R.I.1978); Palmer v.