Case law

Board of Com'rs of Grady Co. v. Hammerly

85 Okla. 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1921

To this petition the defendants the board of county commissioners and the city of Chickasha demurred, which demurrer was by the court overruled and exceptions saved. The defendant A. V. … V. Foster and the board of county commissioners and the city of Chickasha severally excepted and exceptions allowed. “Will Linn, District Judge.” The act in question is follows .

Stipe v. State Ex Rel. Board of Trustees

188 P.3d 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 2008

Porter v. … United Airlines, Inc. v. State Board. of Equalization, 1990 OK 29 , 789 P.2d 1805 , 1311-12.

State Board of Barber Examiners v. Norman

192 Okla. 321 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1943

Ryan v. Humphries, 50 Okla. 343 , 150 P. 1106 ; School District v. Shelton, 26 Okla. 229 , 109 P. 67 ; Board of County Com’rs v. Enid, 116 Okla. 249 , 244 P. 426 , and other cases. … GIBSON, V. C. J., dissents.

Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Renshaw

23 Okla. 56 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1909

In Norris v. Haggin, 136 U. S. 386, 10 Sup. Ct. 942, 34 L. Ed. 424 , Mr. … In McClure v.

Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. Woodworth

89 Okla. 192 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1923

A few of the cases announcing this same principle are as follows: Fox v. City of Seattle (Wash.) 86 Pac. 379 : Howland v. Board of Supervisors, 109 Cal. 152 , 41 Pac. 864 ; Morgan v. … Kansas Cily v. *196 Orear (Mo.) 210 S. W. 892 ; Franklin v. School District, 271 Mo. 698 , 197 S. W. 346 ; Montgomery County Fiscal Court v. Thimble, 104 Ky. 629 , 47 S. W. 773 ; Board of Education v.

Board of Com'rs of Cherokee County v. Hatfield

121 Okla. 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1926

See In re Ccurthouse of Okmulgee Co., 58 Okla. 683 , 161 Pac. 200 ; Ter. v. Neville, 10 Okla. 79 , 60 Pac. 790 ; School Dist. 7 v. Cunningham, 51 Okla. 201 , 151 Pac. 633 ; Parker v. … Co. v. Willis, Co.

Blue v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin Co.

82 Okla. 178 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 10, 1921

Plaintiff in error in his brief concedes that this identical question was decided adversely to him by this court in the case of Allen v. … The is a very important question in the case, and was discussed in the opinion in the case of Alien v. Trimmer, supra.

Board of Comrs. Custer Co. v. De Lana

8 Okla. 213 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

.: This was an action brought in the district court of Custer county by the defendant in error, plaintiff in the court below, against the board of county commissioners of Custer county, to recover a judgment against said … This case comes clearly within the rule laid down in the case of Board v. Hubble, this volume, p. 169, 56 Pac. 1058 , and authorities there cited. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.

State Ex Rel. Board of Ed. v. Morley

168 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1934

.; City of Ardmore v. Excise Board, 155 Okla. 126 , 8 P. (2d) 2 ; Board of Education v. State, 26 Okla. 366 , 109 P. 563 ; Atchison, T. & S. E. Ry. Co. v. … Board of Education v. Excise Board of Payne County. 155 Okla. 227 , 7 P. (2d) 473 ; Stockton v. Excise Board of Payne County, 155 Okla. 120 , 8 P. (2d) 57 ; State ex rel. Con. Dist., etc., v.

Board of Com'rs of Canadian County v. Tinklepaugh

49 Okla. 440 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 16, 1915

Clerk, v. Garfield Exchange Bank of Enid, 38 Okla. 539 , 134 Pac. 863 ; Asher State Bank v. Board of County Commissioners of Pottawatomie County, 31 Okla. 145 , 120 Pac. 634 ; Carrico et al. v. … BROWN, J., absent. SHARP, J., dissents.

Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Worrell

33 Okla. 390 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 1912

In Felkner v. … The case of Board of Education of the City of Pond Creek v.

Pope v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma Co.

45 Okla. 521 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1915

This is an appeal from the action of the superior court of Oklahoma county in affirming the action of the board of county commissioners of said county in rejecting a claim for $1,284.25 presented to it by the county attorney … Marr v. State, 26 Ark. 410 ; Combs v. People, 39 Ill. 183 ; People v. Witt, 19 Ill. 169 ; State v. Klingman, 14 Iowa, 404 .

Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Bilby

174 Okla. 199 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1935

The same contention was again presented in Whiteneck, Adm’r, v. Board of Com’rs of Woods County, 89 Okla. 52 , 213 P. 865 , and therein the rule announced in the Board of Com’rs v. … Thereafter, in the case of Board of Trustees of Crutcho Township v.

Hoerman v. Western Heights Board of Education

913 P.2d 684 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1995

Sifagaloa v. Board of Trustees, 74 Haw. 181 , 840 P.2d 367 (1992); Martin v. Montezuma-Cortez School District, 809 P.2d 1010 (Colo.App.1990). … Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 833 P.2d 1218 (Okla.1992).

Smith v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin County

62 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 2, 1917

Considering the provisions of the foregoing act, in Johnson v. … Parker et al. v. Board of Com’rs of Tillman County, 41 Okla. 723 , 139 Pac. 981 . It follows that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. By the Court: It is so ordered.

Brown v. Harvey

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 17, 2025

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA FRANKIE JOE BROWN ) … See Pahls v.

Brown v. Bryant

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Mar 17, 2025

Hall v. … Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93-95 (2007) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)).

Earlsboro Gas Co. v. Vern H. Brown Drilling Co.

175 Okla. 320 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1935

As said in Doyle-Kidd Dry Goods Co. v. A. W. … J., OSBORN, V. C. j., and BAYLESS, WELCH, and CORN, JJ., concur.

Ricks Exploration Co. v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

695 P.2d 498 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1984

Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District, Okl., 464 P.2d 748, 755 [1969]. … See also Crump v. Guyer, 60 Okl. 222 , 157 P. 321 , 322 [1916]. . Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District, supra note 23. . Roxana Petroleum Co. v.

Board of Com'rs of Logan County v. State

122 Okla. 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1927

Board of Com’rs of Washita County v. Brett, 32 Okla. 853 , 124 Pac. 57 ; Welker v. Annett, 44 Okla. 520 , 145 Pac. 411 ; Board of County Com’rs of Noble County v. Whitney, 73 Okla. 160 , 175 Pac. 112 . … We are not unmindful of th'e rule announced in the following cases: State v. Pierce County (Wash.) 231 Pac. 801 : Price v. Huwe, 105 Ohio St. 304 , 137 N. E. 168 ; State ex rel. McCue v. Lewis (N. D.) 119 N.