Case law

State v. Brown

23 N.C. App. 291 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1974

See State v. Rankin, 284 N.C. 219 , 200 S.E. 2d 182 (1973) and State v. Washington, 17 N.C. App. 569 , 195 S.E. 2d 1 (1973). These assignments of error are not sustained. … State v. Biggs, 224 N.C. 722 , 32 S.E. 2d 352 (1944). It is also well settled that on appeal the court’s instructions will be viewed in their entirety. Hammond v. Bullard, 267 N.C. 570 , 148 S.E. 2d 523 (1966).

Brown v. Gurkin

22 N.C. App. 456 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 17, 1974

Isley v. Brown, 253 N.C. 791 , 117 S.E. 2d 821 (1960); Perkins v. Perkins, 249 N.C. 152 , 105 S.E. 2d 663 (1958). In Harris v. … See also, Williams v. Williams, 220 N.C. 806 , 18 S.E. 2d 364 (1941).

State v. Brown

14 N.C. App. 570 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 24, 1972

In State v. Ball, 277 N.C. 714 , 178 S.E. 2d 877 (1971), our Supreme Court in an opinion by Justice Moore said: The fundamental law of this State reserves to each defendant the right to a speedy trial. … In State v.

State v. Brown

13 N.C. App. 327 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 29, 1971

State v. Davis, 261 N.C. 655 , 135 S.E. 2d 663 (1964). G.S. 20-138 makes the operation of a vehicle wpon the public highways while under the influence of an intoxicating beverage a criminal offense. … State v. Hammonds, 241 N.C. 226 , 85 S.E. 2d 133 (1954). We can perceive no way in which the phraseology used in the warrant could have been prejudicial to defendant. This assignment of error is overruled.

Yates v. Brown

4 N.C. App. 92 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1969

In Davidson v. … In Bank v.

Ayers v. Brown

25 N.C. App. 476 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 16, 1975

This case presents no question not answered by this Court in Wood v. Brown, Administrator, 25 N.C. App. 241 , 212 S.E. 2d 690 (1975). … On authority of Wood v. Brown, supra, all assignments of error are overruled. No error. Judges Britt and Arnold concur.

Brown v. Alexander

1 N.C. App. 160 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1968

Webb v. Gaskins, 255 N.C. 281 , 121 S.E. 2d 564 . … Kohler v. Construction Co., 271 N.C. 187 , 155 S.E. 2d 558 .

State v. Brown

29 N.C. App. 180 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1976

Index 2d, Criminal Law § 162; State v. Harrell, 16 N.C. App. 620 , 192 S.E. 2d 645 (1972) ; State v. Davis, 8 N.C. App. 589 , 174 S.E. 2d 865 (1970). Appeal dismissed. Judges Parker and Clark concur.

Brown v. Moore

22 N.C. App. 445 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 17, 1974

Lumber Co. v. Lumber Co., 187 N.C. 417 , 121 S.E. 755 (1924). It is equally well-settled that a motion to set aside a verdict for inadequacy is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge. Hinton v.

Brown v. Williams

242 N.C. 648 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 28, 1955

Lance v. Cogdill, 238 N.C. 500, 78 S.E. 2d 319 . Accordingly the restraining order was continued to the final determination of the action.

State v. Brown

29 N.C. App. 391 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 1976

The Motion is Denied.’ ” State v. Carriker, supra. … Brown, the defendant herein, did not testify at trial. He did, however, offer the testimony of his cousin, Steve Brown.

Solesbee v. Brown

25 N.C. App. 476 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 16, 1975

This case presents no question not answered by this Court in Wood v. Brown, 25 N.C. App. 241 (1975) filed- 2 April 1975.

Brown v. Smith

23 N.C. App. 224 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 1974

Simmons v. Textile Workers Union, 15 N.C. App. 220 , 189 S.E. 2d 556 ; Beck Distributing Corp. v. Imported Parts, Inc., 10 N.C. App. 737 , 179 S.E. 2d 793 .

State v. Brown

28 N.C. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1976

State v. Dockery, 23 N.C. App. 554 , 209 S.E. 2d 339 (1974). Error does not appear upon the face of the record. No error. Judges Vaughn and Clark concur.

Michael v. Brown

215 N.C. 655 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1939

R. v. Olive, 142 N. C., 257 , 55 S. E., 263 . As we- understand tbe record and interpret it, tbe plaintiff bas no just cause for complaint.

Brown v. Linville Railway Co.

174 N.C. 694 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1917

In Le Beau v. R. … Ramsbottom v. R. R., 138 N. C., 38 ; Brewster v. Elizabeth City, 137 N. C., 392 .”

Brown v. Nesbitt

271 N.C. 532 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1967

Jyachosky v. Wensil, 240 N.C. 217 , 81 S.E. 2d 644 ; Whiteside v. McCarson, 250 N.C. 673 , 110 S.E. 2d 295 ; Duckworth v. Metcalf, 268 N.C. 340 , 150 S.E. 2d 485 . As to the necessity of such pleading: Hartley v. … See Whiteside v. McCarson, supra, and Torres v. Smith, 269 N.C. 546 , 153 S.E. 2d 129 .

Board of Supervisors Public Roads v. Board of Commissioners

169 N.C. 548 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1915

In Glenn v. Comrs., 139 N. … This case is cited with approval in Davenport v.

State v. Brown

237 N.C. 439 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 25, 1953

S. v. Ray, 212 N.C. 748 , 194 S.E. 472 ; S. v. McKeon, 223 N.C. 404 , 26 S.E. 2d 914 . Tbe judgment below is Affirmed.

Brown v. Doby

244 N.C. 746 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1956

Board of Education v. Allen, 243 N.C. 520 , 91 S.E. 2d 180 . The respondents’ rights are limited to the recovery of damages. The petitioners’ liability is to pay them. The parties failed to agree as to the amount.