Case law

Board of Education v. State Board of Education

217 N.C. 90 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1940

Code, 1935 (Michie), sec. 5683, provides: “Loans by State Board from State Literary Fund. … Tbe loan was approved by tbe defendant, State Board of Education, on 21 June, 1939, during tbe fiscal year in wbicb tbe money could be borrowed under tbe Constitution, Art. V, sec. 4.

Lashlee v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.

144 N.C. App. 684 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 17, 2001

In Jenkins , the plaintiff was partially paralyzed after making a shallow dive from his knees from the end of a lakeside sliding board. … The plaintiff acknowledged that he and others had gone down the slide board on their knees many times before; that he knew the water under the board was shallow, although he did not know how shallow; and that he knew it would

Board of Education v. Board of County Commissioners

240 N.C. 118 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1954

Rogers, 204 N.C. 308 , 168 S.E. 206 ; and reference thereto was made in Board of Education v. Walter, 198 N.C. 325 , 151 S.E. 718 , and in Wilkinson v. Board of Education, 199 N.C. 669 , 155 S.E. 562 . … Evans v. Mecklenburg, 205 N.C. 560 , 172 S.E. 323 .

Brown v. Kinston Manufacturing Co.

175 N.C. 201 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 13, 1918

work would not have been hazardous, and if due care, which is ordinary care, had been exercised by the defendant, the injury would not have- *203 resulted, and this brings tbe ease fairly witbin the rule stated in Cochran v. … Johnson v. R. R., 163 N. C., 431, 453 . No error.

Brown v. Between Dandelions

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 15, 2020

Background  BROWN ET AL. V. BETWEEN DANDELIONS, INC. … Painting Co., Inc. v. D.W. Ward Const. Co., Inc., 174 N.C. App. 327, -3-  BROWN ET AL. V.

Brown v. City of Burlington

366 N.C. 409 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 2012

McLaurin v. Prestage Foods, Inc.

271 F.R.D. 465 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 10, 2010

Co. v. Brown, 511 U.S. 117, 121 , 114 S.Ct. 1359 , 128 L.Ed.2d 33 (1994); 7AA Charles A. Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Mary Kay Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 1784.1 (3d ed. 2005). … Co. v. Brown, 511 U.S. 117, 121 , 114 S.Ct. 1359 , 128 L.Ed.2d 33 (1994); 7AA Charles A. Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Maiy Kay Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 1784.1 (3d ed. 2005).

Trull and Brown v. . the Bd. of Com. of Madison Co.

72 N.C. 388 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1875

State v. Commissioners of Craven, 70 N. C. Rep., 644 ; Maury v. Commissioners of Montgomery, 71 N. C. Rep., 486 .

Brown v. City of Burlington

221 N.C. App. 666 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 3, 2012

727 S.E.2d 405 (2012) BROWN v. CITY OF BURLINGTON. No. COA11-1406. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed July 3, 2012. Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.

Brown v. Catawba Lumber Co.

117 N.C. 287 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1895

recover for a breach by the defendant of a mutual agreement theretofore made between them, by the terms of which the defendant *295 was to pay the plaintiff, as bandsawyer at its mill according to the number of feet of boards … Allen v. Sallinger, 105 N. C., 339: Turrentine v. Railroad, 92 N. C., 612 ; Porter v. Railroad, 97 N. C., 66 ; Mitchell v. Brown, 88 N. C., 156 .

Brown v. O'Toole

337 N.C. 686 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 9, 1994

Pursuant to Hargett v. Holland, 337 N.C. 651 , 447 S.E.2d 784 (1994), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. REVERSED.

Harvey Blair & Co. v. Brown

116 N.C. 631 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1895

Y., 446 ; Smith v. Eastern, 54 Md., 138 . In response to plaintiff’s *640 prayer for instructions His Honor among other things charged the jury as follows : 1. … The doctrine laid down in Stone v. Marshall, 7 Jones, 300 , was overruled by Morris v. Pear son, 79 N. C., 253 . There is error also in His Honor’s having given No. 11 of plaintiff’s prayer for instruction.

Brown v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

325 N.C. 270 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1989

State v. Brown

23 N.C. App. 291 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1974

See State v. Rankin, 284 N.C. 219 , 200 S.E. 2d 182 (1973) and State v. Washington, 17 N.C. App. 569 , 195 S.E. 2d 1 (1973). These assignments of error are not sustained. … State v. Biggs, 224 N.C. 722 , 32 S.E. 2d 352 (1944). It is also well settled that on appeal the court’s instructions will be viewed in their entirety. Hammond v. Bullard, 267 N.C. 570 , 148 S.E. 2d 523 (1966).

Brown v. Gurkin

22 N.C. App. 456 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 17, 1974

Isley v. Brown, 253 N.C. 791 , 117 S.E. 2d 821 (1960); Perkins v. Perkins, 249 N.C. 152 , 105 S.E. 2d 663 (1958). In Harris v. … See also, Williams v. Williams, 220 N.C. 806 , 18 S.E. 2d 364 (1941).

State v. Brown

14 N.C. App. 570 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 24, 1972

In State v. Ball, 277 N.C. 714 , 178 S.E. 2d 877 (1971), our Supreme Court in an opinion by Justice Moore said: The fundamental law of this State reserves to each defendant the right to a speedy trial. … In State v.

State v. Brown

13 N.C. App. 327 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 29, 1971

State v. Davis, 261 N.C. 655 , 135 S.E. 2d 663 (1964). G.S. 20-138 makes the operation of a vehicle wpon the public highways while under the influence of an intoxicating beverage a criminal offense. … State v. Hammonds, 241 N.C. 226 , 85 S.E. 2d 133 (1954). We can perceive no way in which the phraseology used in the warrant could have been prejudicial to defendant. This assignment of error is overruled.

Yates v. Brown

4 N.C. App. 92 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1969

In Davidson v. … In Bank v.

Brooks v. Brown

36 N.C. App. 738 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1978

parcel to Brown. … Brown and J. L.

Ayers v. Brown

25 N.C. App. 678 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 1975

This case presents no question not answered by this Court in Wood v. Brown, Administrator, 25 N.C. App. 241 , 212 S.E. 2d 690 (filed 2 April 1975). It would serve no useful purpose to discuss each assignment of error. … On authority of Wood v. Brown, supra, all assignments of error are overruled. No error. Chief Judge Brock and Judge Vaughn' concur.