Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersME

9,550 results

4.41s

  • Newfield Sand v. Town of Newfield

    2025 ME 45 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 3, 2025

    Town of Boothbay v. … Warren Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mahaney v. State

    610 A.2d 738 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1992

    See Giberson v. Quinn, 445 A.2d 1007, 1008 (Me.1982). … See Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976). IY. As a state agency the parole board’s policies and decisions are subject to the commands of the equal protection clause. See Avery v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Forbes v. Town of Southwest Harbor

    763 A.2d 1183 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 16, 2001

    . [¶ 15] In City of Calais v. … City of Calais v.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Daniels v. Daniels

    593 A.2d 658 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 16, 1991

    Brown v. Corriveau, 576 A.2d 200, 201 (Me.1990). … Brown was correctly decided and clearly governs this case.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Angell Family 2012 Prouts Neck Trusts v. Town of Scarborough Kenyon C. Bolton III v. Town of Scarborough

    149 A.3d 271 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 13, 2016

    v. … Light Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Cope v. Inhabitants of Town of Brunswick

    464 A.2d 223 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 31, 1983

    In Stucki v. … Community School, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Camden, 369 A.2d 1146, 1149 (Me.1977).

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Friends of Lincoln Lakes v. Town of Lincoln

    2 A.3d 284 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 12, 2010

    Norris Family Assocs., LLC v. Town of Phippsburg, 2005 ME 102, ¶ 11 , 879 A.2d 1007, 1012 . We review the issue of a party’s standing to bring an 80B appeal de *288 novo. Id. … In evaluating the town’s actions, “we review directly the decision of the tribunal of original jurisdiction,” which in this case is the Board because it conducted fact-finding on the standing issue. Nergaard v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Chapel Road Associates, L.L.C. v. Town of Wells

    2001 Me. 178 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 27, 2001

    (quoting Maine AFL-CIO v. Superintendent of Ins., 595 A.2d 424, 428 (Me.1991)); see also Harrington v. … from stated conclusory facts, see Wells v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • FPL Energy Maine Hydro LLC v. Department of Environmental Protection

    926 A.2d 1197 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 26, 2007

    Town of Jay v. … Stewart v. Town of Sedgwick, 2000 ME 157, ¶ 4 , 757 A.2d 773, 775 ; see also Aviation Oil Co. v. Dep’t of Envtl.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Fletcher v. Feeney

    400 A.2d 1084 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 26, 1979

    Poulin v. Poulin, Me., 241 A.2d 611, 612 (1968); Bove v. Board of Review of City of Newport, 95 R.I. 197 , 185 A.2d 751, 752 (1962); Long v. Zoning Commission, supra, 50 A.2d at 174-175 . … Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. Walsh, 244 N.Y. 280 , 155 N.E. 575 (1927). See also Girouard v. Zoning Board of Appeals, Oct. 2, 1972, York County Docket No. 2549 (Glassman, J.)

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Stephen Doane v. Department of Health and Human Services

    250 A.3d 1101 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 13, 2021

    See Kovack v. … See Fitanides v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Camp v. Town of Shapleigh

    2008 Me. 53 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 18, 2008

    Gerald v. … See Radin v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Shackford & Gooch, Inc. v. Town of Kennebunk

    486 A.2d 102 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 31, 1984

    The opponents appeared before the Board and as abutting landowners demonstrated they would suffer particularized injury as a result of the Board’s action. See Harrington v. … On review of an action taken by a zoning board of appeals, we may not make factual findings independent of those of the board, nor may we substitute our judgment for that of the board. Mack v.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Darya I. Zappia v. Town of Old Orchard Beach

    271 A.3d 753 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 1, 2022

    Hill v. … See LaMarre, 2021 ME 45, ¶ 5, 259 A.3d 764; Gensheimer v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Swanzy v. Webster

    48 F. 463 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 10, 1890

    I concur in the conclusion of Brown, -I., in The Amos D. Carver, 35 Fed. Rep. 665, and followed by Nelson, J., in McPhail v. Williams, 41 Fed. … Hall v. Barker, 64 Me. 343 ; Jesson v. Solly, 4 Taunt. 53.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Daniel G. Raposa, Jr. v. Town of York

    2020 ME 72 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 19, 2020

    . § 2691(3)(E); Carroll v. … Boivin v. Sanford, 588 A.2d 1197, 1199 (Me. 1991) (alteration and quotation marks omitted); see Grant v. Town of Belgrade, 2019 ME 160, ¶ 8, 221 A.3d 112; MSR Recycling, LLC v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mottram v. State

    232 A.2d 809 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 21, 1967

    Martin v. State Board of Parole, 1966, 350 Mass. 210 , 213 N.E.2d 925 ; Jones v. Rivers, 4th Cir., 1964, 338 F.2d 862 at page 874; Curtis v. … In Benson v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Donald R. Paradis v. Town of Peru

    115 A.3d 610 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 7, 2015

    Dubois Livestock, Inc. v. Town of Arundel, 2014 ME 122, ¶ 9, 103 A.3d 556; see Eliot Shores, LLC v. Town of Eliot, 2010 ME 129, ¶¶ 5-10, 9 A.3d 806; Farrell v. City of Auburn, 2010 ME 88, ¶¶ 6-18, 3 A.3d 385. … of the merits of the matter.5 See Hopkinson v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Daniel G. Raposa, Jr. v. Town of York

    2020 ME 72 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 19, 2020

    . § 2691(3)(E); Carroll v. … Boivin v. Sanford, 588 A.2d 1197, 1199 (Me. 1991) (alteration and quotation marks omitted); see Grant v. Town of Belgrade, 2019 ME 160, ¶ 8, 221 A.3d 112; MSR Recycling, LLC v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sultan Corporation v. Department of Environmental Protection

    2022 ME 21 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 2022

    Gashgai v. Bd. of Registration in Med., 390 A.2d 1080, 1085 (Me. 1978). “[W]e will not substitute our judgment for the Board’s.” Rossignol v. Me. Pub. Emps. Ret. … Once the Board addresses the availability of the defense and adequately sets forth the basis for its decision, see Palian v. Dep’t. of Health & Hum.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.