Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

4.81s

  • Brown v. Covenant Mutual Life Insurance

    86 Mo. 51 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1885

    Defendant also wrote Abbott, giving him authority to-settle with Brown. … Bump on Bankruptcy (10 Ed.) 286 ; Thornton v. Hogan, 63 Mo. 143 . There is no merit, whatever, in the other questions presented by the appellant.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

    803 S.W.2d 610 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 17, 1990

    In Kennedy v. … Fahy v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of St. Louis

    561 S.W.3d 839 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 2018

    Introduction Stephen Brown (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment affirming the decision of the City of St. … Upon arrival at the tow lot, Officers Ellis Brown and Jennifer Nemeth (Officers Brown and Nemeth) found Marshall and Davis in a City tow truck filled with stolen items and stopped at the exit gate from the lot, which could

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Reliance Insurance Co. v. Brown

    40 B.R. 214 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 5, 1984

    Schultz v. Schultz, 637 S.W.2d 1, 4 (Mo.1982). … Suhre v. Busch, 343 Mo. 679 , 123 S.W.2d 8, 15 (1938). The evidence in support of a constructive trust must be clear, cogent and convincing. Crites v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bank of Missouri

    2 Mo. 154 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 15, 1830

    This was an action of assumpsit on a promissory note,- made by one Wilkison to Brown, payable at the Branch Bank in Ste. Genevieve, and endorsed by Brown to the plaintiff. … But no evidence was given of notice to Brown of the non-payment. Evidence was also given that Brown was endorser for the accommodation of Wilkison.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown, Latrasse & Turner

    191 Mo. 161 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 21, 1905

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bonnet-Brown Sales Service v. Utt

    323 Mo. 589 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 6, 1929

    See cases cited; also Sewing Machine Co. v. Radcliffe, 137 U.S. 287 ; Cooper v. Newell, 173 U.S. 555 . … [Sewing Machine Co. v. Radcliffe, supra; Cooper v. Newell, supra; Stuart v. Dickinson, supra.] II.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Ellis v. Brown

    326 Mo. 637 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 17, 1930

    Ellis v. Brown, 326 Mo. 627 , 33 S. W. (2d) 104 , a companion case, decided at this term. … The registration is conducted in every precinct by a board of registry appointed bv the board of election commissioners.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown-Forman Distillers Corporation v. Stewart

    520 S.W.2d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1975

    The trial court denied relief and Brown-Forman, et al., appealed. … Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Niagara Fire Insurance

    132 F. Supp. 509 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 7, 1955

    Fitzgerald v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co., C.C.Neb., 45 F. 812 ; Ostrum v. Edison, D.C.N.J., 244 F. 228 ; Tinney v. McClain, D.C. N.D.Tex., 76 F.Supp. 694 . … Co. v. Eiier, 8 Cir., 125 F.2d 229 3,500 . 350. 1,000. 26.0 Union Ind. Co. v. Home Trust Co., 8 Cir., 64 F.2d 906 12,830 . 1,100. 1,285. 9.2 Southern Surety Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lee Brown v. Michael D. Trent

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 2024

    Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). The court erred in denying Brown’s motion for jury trial. … Holm v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Garner-Kight

    982 S.W.2d 811 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1998

    Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Baker

    64 Mo. 167 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1876

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Idel v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.

    343 Mo. 373 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1938

    Hereinafter the term defendant has reference to Hamilton Brown Shoe Company. … In State ex rel. v. C., B. Q.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • J. Thomas & Son v. Brown

    168 Mo. App. 667 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1913

    [Bowser v. Atkinson, 161 Mo. App. 450 , 143 S. W. 75 ; Neil v. Cunningham Store Co., 149 Mo. App. 53 , 130 S. W. 503 ; Whitener v. Scoggins, 152 Mo. App. 343 , 133 S. W. 90 .] … Fowler v. Chaney, 36 Mo. App. 513 , and again in the case of Lindsey v. Dixon, 52 Mo. App. 291 , the judgment would stand.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Daggett Hardware Co. v. Brown-Lee

    186 Mo. 621 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 21, 1905

    [Hammond v. Scott, 12 Mo. 8 ; Judge v. Booge, 47 Mo. 544 ; Phillips v. Stewart, 59 Mo. 491 ; Harlin v. Nation, 126 Mo. 97 .] … In Goode v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

    33 Mo. 309 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1863

    The first is erroneous, in that it assumes the existence of the facts in contest, viz., the possession of the property in controversy, and the exercise of acts of ownership over it by Brown the plaintiff.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Eggers v. Brown

    345 Mo. 430 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 5, 1939

    Hathaway v. State Board of Health, 103 Mo. 22 , 15 S. W. 322 ; State ex rel. Myers v. Shinnick, 19 S. W. (2d) 676 .] We rule this point against relator. Points 1, 2, 3 and 7 strike at the return of respondents. … Conran v. Williams, 96 Mo. l. c. 18, 8 S. W. 771 ; State ex rel. Hathaway v. State Board of Health, 103 Mo. 22 , 15 S. W. 322 .]

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State of Missouri v. Angela Brown

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 2023

    Robinson v. State, 655 S.W.3d 256, 259 (Mo. App. 2022) (quoting Terry v. State, 647 S.W.3d 78, 81 (Mo. App. 2022)). … State v. Thorton, 930 S.W.2d 54, 56 (Mo. App. 1996). The escape rule may not be applied to dismiss any post-capture errors. Robinson v. State, 854 S.W.2d 393, 396 (Mo. banc 1993); Harmon v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Trade v. National Board of Trade

    154 F. 238 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Mar 25, 1907

    This paragraph sets out, with perhaps some unnecessary detail, the manner of the operation of the complainant Board of Trade, or exchange, and the way in which the information of the operations and markets of the board are … This allegation is not immaterial, as it bears upon the history and purposes of the organization of said National Board of Trade of Kansas City and its pretensions. This exception must be overruled. Exception 21.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.