Case law

Donald R. Paradis v. Town of Peru

115 A.3d 610 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 7, 2015

Dubois Livestock, Inc. v. Town of Arundel, 2014 ME 122, ¶ 9, 103 A.3d 556; see Eliot Shores, LLC v. Town of Eliot, 2010 ME 129, ¶¶ 5-10, 9 A.3d 806; Farrell v. City of Auburn, 2010 ME 88, ¶¶ 6-18, 3 A.3d 385. … of the merits of the matter.5 See Hopkinson v.

Mutton Hill Estates, Inc. v. Town of Oakland

468 A.2d 989 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 15, 1983

In Frank v. … In Danforth v.

Kelley v. Maine Public Employees Retirement System

967 A.2d 676 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 12, 2009

Hale-Rice v. Me. State Ret. Sys., 1997 ME 64, ¶ 17 , 691 A.2d 1232, 1237 (quoting Douglas v. Bd. of Trs. of the Me. State Ret. Sys., 669 A.2d 177, 179 (Me.1996)). B. … In Rodriques v.

United States v. Whitmore

536 F. Supp. 1284 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 9, 1982

See United States v. Williams, 589 F.2d 210, 214 (5th Cir. 1979) [passengers possess standing to object to vessel stop and boarding], modified en banc, 617 F.2d 1063 (5th Cir. 1980). See also Rakas v. … Pimental, 645 F.2d 85, 86 (1st Cir. 1981), quoting Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) (footnotes omitted) (emphasis supplied).

Daniel Raposa Jr. v. Town of York

2019 ME 29 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 26, 2019

Salisbury v. Town of Bar Harbor, 2002 ME 13, ¶ 11, 788 A.2d 598. [¶8] In 2010, we cited Herrle when we decided Farrell v. City of Auburn, 2010 ME 88, 3 A.3d 385, and Shores v. … Because the Board conducted a de novo review of the CEO’s determination, we review the Board’s decision directly. See Yates v. Town of Sw. Harbor, 2001 ME 2, ¶ 10, 763 A.2d 1168; Stewart v.

Raposa v. Town of York

204 A.3d 129 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 26, 2019

Salisbury v. Town of Bar Harbor , 2002 ME 13 , ¶ 11, 788 A.2d 598 . [¶8] In 2010, we cited Herrle when we decided Farrell v. City of Auburn , 2010 ME 88 , 3 A.3d 385 , and Shores v. … Because the Board conducted a de novo review of the CEO's determination, we review the Board's decision directly. See Yates v. Town of Sw. Harbor , 2001 ME 2 , ¶ 10, 763 A.2d 1168 ; Stewart v.

Forbes v. Town of Southwest Harbor

763 A.2d 1183 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 16, 2001

. [¶ 15] In City of Calais v. … City of Calais v.

Witham Family Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Bar Harbor

30 A.3d 811 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 1, 2011

Smith, 457 A.2d 816 , 822 n. 9 (Me.1983); Harrington v. Inhabitants of Town of Kennebunk, 459 A.2d 557, 560 (Me.1983). Cf. Jaeger v. … In Boston & Maine Corporation v.

District Court for District IX v. Williams

268 A.2d 812 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 20, 1970

In Bowden v. … In Gray v.

Friends of Lincoln Lakes v. Town of Lincoln

2 A.3d 284 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 12, 2010

Norris Family Assocs., LLC v. Town of Phippsburg, 2005 ME 102, ¶ 11 , 879 A.2d 1007, 1012 . We review the issue of a party’s standing to bring an 80B appeal de *288 novo. Id. … In evaluating the town’s actions, “we review directly the decision of the tribunal of original jurisdiction,” which in this case is the Board because it conducted fact-finding on the standing issue. Nergaard v.

Jordan v. City of Ellsworth

828 A.2d 768 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 3, 2003

When there is no ambiguity in the language of the ordinance, we ordinarily review a Board’s characterization of a structure as a finding of fact, giving deference to the Board’s ultimate conclusion. Goldman v. … Nugent v. Town of Camden, 1998 ME 92, ¶ 7 , 710 A.2d 245, 247 .

Petition of Edwin R. Jonas III for Reinstatement to the Bar of the State of Maine

2017 ME 48 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 16, 2017

See State v. … See Conary v. Perkins, 464 A.2d 972, 975-76 (Me. 1983); Reed v. Tracy, 435 A.2d 745, 746 (Me. 1981).

Camp v. Town of Shapleigh

2008 Me. 53 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 18, 2008

Gerald v. … See Radin v.

Pearson v. Town of Kennebunk

590 A.2d 535 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 2, 1991

See Anderson v. … See Harrington v. Inhabitants of Kennebunk, 459 A.2d 557, 562 (Me.1983). Although a zoning board of appeals is directed by statute to make adequate findings and conclusions, see Glosser v.

Scott v. Fall Line Condo. Ass'n

206 A.3d 307 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 4, 2019

Burdzel v. Sobus , 2000 ME 84 , ¶ 6, 750 A.2d 573 . … Farrington's Owners' Ass'n v.

Darya I. Zappia v. Town of Old Orchard Beach

271 A.3d 753 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 1, 2022

Hill v. … See LaMarre, 2021 ME 45, ¶ 5, 259 A.3d 764; Gensheimer v.

Aubry v. Town of Mount Desert

10 A.3d 662 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 2, 2010

Brickley v. Horton, 2008 ME 111, ¶ 10 , 951 A.2d 801, 803 . … Perry Iron & Metal Co., 2006 ME 52 , 896 A.2d 956 ; *665 Malonson v. Town of Berwick, 2003 ME 148 , 838 A.2d 338 ; Doggett v. Town of Gouldsboro, 2002 ME 175 , 812 A.2d 256 .

Dumont v. Speers

245 A.2d 151 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 22, 1968

Brown, et als., 135 Me. 117, 119 , 190 A. 632 ; Young v. … “The regulatory power of the state over fish and game within its boundaries may, to a certain extent, be delegated to a board or commission.” 35 Am.Jur., 2d Fish and Game § 31.

Mottram v. State

232 A.2d 809 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 21, 1967

Martin v. State Board of Parole, 1966, 350 Mass. 210 , 213 N.E.2d 925 ; Jones v. Rivers, 4th Cir., 1964, 338 F.2d 862 at page 874; Curtis v. … In Benson v.

Frederick Olson v. Town of Yarmouth

2018 ME 27 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 22, 2018

v. TOWN OF YARMOUTH et al. … Bizier v. Town of Turner, 2011 ME 116, ¶ 8, 32 A.3d 1048 (quotation marks omitted).