Case law

Hollar v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

317 A.2d 868 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1974

PAIR, Associate Judge: On this petition for review of a decision of the District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board (the Board), 1 the sole question is whether petitioner was available for work during the period … A transcript of the proceedings was furnished to the Board and upon consideration thereof by an appeals examiner the determination of the Board’s claims deputy was, on August 13, 1973, affirmed.

Moss v. Civil Aeronautics Board

430 F.2d 891 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1970

The Board relies heavily on Interstate Commerce Commission v. Inland Waterways Corp., supra Note 29, in its argument. … See also United States v.

Matheson v. Practical Nurses' Examining Board

195 A.2d 402 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1963

This is an appeal from a decision of the Practical Nurses’ Examining Board denying petitioner’s application for a license by waiver. 1 As in Corbett v. … Principal reliance is placed on Valentine v.

Proulx v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

430 A.2d 34 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1981

Liberty v. District of Columbia Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 410 A.2d 191, 192 (1979) citing Morgan v. … [Seabolt v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 413 A.2d 908, 911 (1980), citing Jones v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 375 A.2d 1, 6 (1977).]

Kessler v. Surface Transportation Board

637 F.3d 369 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 15, 2011

5 U.S.C. § 706(A)(2); Riffin v. … See Calderon v.

Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. Brown

45 App. D.C. 579 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 2, 1917

The defendant relies upon Overland Washington Motor Co. v. Alexander, 43 App. D. C. 282. … In Boogher v. Byers, 10 App. D. C. 419, this court sustained a judgment under the 73d rule “for want of proper affidavit to the pleas, as required by the rule.”

Pettis v. Brown and Root, Inc

489 F.2d 1272 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 1974

489 F.2d 1272 160 U.S.App.D.C. 148 Pettis v. Brown and Root, Inc. 72-1869 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 1/14/74 1 D.C.D.C. 2 VAC.

Brown v. Morris Cafritz Memorial Hospital

593 F.2d 1370 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1979

593 F.2d 1370 193 U.S.App.D.C. 216 Brown v. Morris Cafritz Memorial Hospital No. 75-1612 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 2/26/79 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

Tilly ex rel. Tilly v. Brown

1 Hay. & Haz. 148 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 28, 1843

Fred D. Brown v. United States

215 F.2d 33 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 1954

BROWN, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 12215. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued June 25, 1954. Decided July 1, 1954.

National Association of Government Employees v. Brown

556 F.2d 76 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 29, 1977

P 7526 , 181 U.S.App.D.C. 199 National Association of Government Employees v. Brown No. 76-1579 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 4/29/77 D.C.D.C., 413 F.Supp. 1224 AFFIRMED

Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

272 F.R.D. 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 2010

Civil Action No. 10-00534 (CKK) BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS, et al., Defendants. … See Baloch v. Norton, 517 F.

Brown v. Philadelphia, Baltimore, & Washington Railroad

36 App. D.C. 221 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1911

Beasley v. Baltimore & P. R. Co. 27 App. D. C. 595, 6 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1048, and cases there cited. See also Bolling v. Kirby, 24 Am. St. Rep. 807 , and note thereto ( 90 Ala. 215 , 7 So. 914 ). … Co. v. Mugg, 202 U. S. 242 , 50 L. ed. 1011, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 628; Texas & P. R. Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co. 204 U. S. 426 , 51 L. ed. 553, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 350, 9 A. & E. Ann. Cas. 1075.

Creed v. National Transportation Safety Board

758 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2010

Chiron v. … City of Rochester v.

Hickman v. Copyright Royalty Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 23, 2009

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).  Plaintiff demands "payment of any royalty payments for use of copyrights, trademarks, [and] patents," an amount which "could exceed [$] 1 billion."

Smith v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

460 A.2d 997 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1983

Neumann Properties, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Appeal and Review, 268 A.2d 605, 606 (D.C.1970). … See Great American Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Novotny, 442 U.S. 366 , 99 S.Ct. 2345 , 60 L.Ed.2d 957 (1979); Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976).

Torvik v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

406 A.2d 1264 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 1979

This court in Jones v. … Consequently, the Board was in error in denying retirement to petitioner. The ruling in Jones, supra, relied on here, may appear to be contrary to the slightly earlier ruling in Coakley v. Police and Firemen’s Ret. & R.

Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

733 F. Supp. 2d 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2010

Both actions stem from allegations that Plaintiff was sexually harassed and assaulted by a co-worker at the Persian News Network and that her employer, the Broadcasting Board of Governors (“BBG”), as well as several members … See Karim-Panahi v. U.S.

Dillmon v. NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD

588 F.3d 1085 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 2009

Before: GARLAND, BROWN and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … BROWN, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Jack Rondal Dillmon accuses the National Transportation Safety Board (Board) of hypocrisy—saying one thing while doing another.

American Federation of Government Employees v. Brown

866 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 14, 1994

United States v. W.T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629, 632 , 73 S.Ct. 894, 897 , 97 L.Ed. 1303 (1953). … Committee in Solidarity v. Sessions, 929 F.2d 742, 745 (D.C.Cir.1991).