Case law

Brown v. Brown

50 Ohio Law. Abs. 90 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1947

Read v Read, 7, Abs 117. The corroboration must pertain to material elements essential to the proof of the ground for divorce set out in the petition. … Faust v Faust, 30 O. L. R. 67; Tiberghein v Tiberghein, 8 O. D. R. 464.

Brown v. Brown

8 Cal. App. 2d 364 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 10, 1935

(Newman v. Freitas, 129 Cal. 283 [ 61 Pac. 907 , 50 L. R. A. 548]; Pereira v. Pereira, 156 Cal. 1 [ 103 Pac. 488 , 134 Am. St. Rep. 107 , 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 880]; Whiting *368 v. Whiting, 62 Cal. … (Colby v. Title Ins. & Trust Co., 160 Cal. 632 [ 117 Pac. 913 , Ann. Cas. 1913A, 515, 35 L. R. A. (N. S.) 813].)

Brown v. Brown

323 Mass. 332 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 29, 1948

Quigley v. Quigley, 310 Mass. 415, 416 . Mooney v. Mooney, 317 Mass. 433, 434 . Vergnani v. Vergnani, 321 Mass. 699, 702 . … Freeborn v. Freeborn, 168 Mass. 50, 52 . Armstrong v. Armstrong, 229 Mass. 592 . Curtiss v. Curtiss, 243 Mass. 51 .

Brown v. Brown

91 Haw. 137 · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · May 27, 1998

Brown v. Brown

286 S.C. 56 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Jun 11, 1985

Bell, Judge: Arnold Brown appeals from an order of the family court *57 requiring him to pay an alimony arrearage of $2,591.00 to his former wife, Sarah Brown. … See Brown v. Brown, 278 S. C. 43, 292 S. E. (2d) 297 (1982). From March 1981 through April 1982, Arnold paid approximately $465.00 a month in alimony pursuant to the 1981 family court order.

Brown v. Brown

209 Mass. 388 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 21, 1911

Brown, but he was allowed his costs. As to him, the bill was in effect dismissed, and he has no ground of complaint. 2. The plaintiff can maintain the suit. … Silloway v. Brown, 12 Allen, 30 , 37, 38, and cases there cited. The female defendant’s liability is the same whether she occupied the property in person or received rent therefor from others, just as in McIntire v.

Brown v. Brown

91 Misc. 220 · City of New York Municipal Court · Jun 15, 1915

Boston Steel & Iron Co. v. Steuer, 183 Mass. 140, 144 ; Thorke v. White, 188 id. 333, 334; Merseck v. Alderman, 77 Conn. 634 , 60 Atl. Rep. 109 ; South Boston Iron Co. v. Brown, 63 Maine, 139; Campbell v. … , but sued Brown upon the note.

Brown v. Brown

433 Pa. Super. 577 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 17, 1994

Brown filed her appeal on October 15, 1993, challenging the validity of the post-nuptial agreement. Mrs. Brown’s appeal was untimely; therefore, this court has no jurisdiction to hear this appeal. See Fried v. … Brown filed her appeal from the order denying post-trial motions. Her appeal, therefore, was untimely. See Pa.R.A.P. 903(a). Prior to this court’s decision in Flowers v.

Brown v. Brown

19 S.W.3d 717 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 2000

Brown (Mother) appeals from the judgment of modification of the trial court terminating joint legal custody and awarding Thomas J. Brown III (Father) legal custody of the parties’ three minor children. … Gibson v. Smith, 422 S.W.2d 321, 329 (Mo.1968).

Brown v. Brown

47 N.C. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 1980

Williams v. Bray, 273 N.C. 198 , 159 S.E. 2d 556 (1968); Sherwood v. Sherwood, 29 N.C. App. 112 , 223 S.E. 2d 509 (1976). … General Specialties Co. v. Teer Co., 41 N.C.

Brown v. Brown

12 S.D. 380 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1900

In Smith v. … W. 737 ; Brown v. Railway Co., 10 S. D. 633, 75 N. W. 198 , — that the execution and filing of an appeal bond for costs is absolutely necessary -to give the appellate court jurisdiction of the appeal.

State ex rel. Board of Education v. Brown

5 L.R.A.N.S. 327 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Mar 9, 1906

Murray v. Board of Co. Commrs. of Ramsey County, 81 Minn. 359 , 84 N. W. 103 , 51 L. R. A. 828, 83 Am. St. … In Hetland v. Board of Co. Commrs. of Norman County, 89 Minn. 492 , 95 N.

Brown v. Brown

421 So. 2d 952 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 12, 1982

421 So.2d 952 (1982) Rosemary Campbell BROWN v. Billy Edwin BROWN. No. 82 CA 0579. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. October 12, 1982. Charles R. Ryan, Houma, for plaintiff-appellee Rosemary Campbell Brown. … This is an appeal from a judgment granting Rosemary Campbell Brown a divorce from Billy Edwin Brown, and ordering that Billy Edwin Brown pay alimony in the sum of $350.00 per month. Billy Edwin Brown has appealed.

Summers v. Sutton

428 So. 2d 1121 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 22, 1983

See Brown v. Sutton, 356 So.2d 965 (La.1978). There is no evidence in the record indicating that the Commissioner was not present during the entire proceedings. … See Baton Rouge Water Works v. La. Pub. Serv. Comm., 342 So.2d 609 (La.1977); see also, Giallanza v. Louisiana Public Serv. Com'n., 412 So.2d 1369 (La.1982); Brown v. Sutton, supra.

Brown v. Brown

139 Ind. 653 · Indiana Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1894

Such a case was McClure v. Raben, 125 Ind. 139 , relied upon by appellants. See, also, Chambers v. Chambers, 139 Ind. 111 , and authorities there cited. … Gray v. Bailey, 42 Ind. 349 ; Bishop v. Davenport, 58 Ill. 105 ; Galbraith v. McLain, 84 Ill. 379 ; Kershaw v. Kershaw, 102 Ill. 307 ; Jones v. Jones, 46 Ia. 466 ; Smith v. Smith, 59 Me. 214 ; Trull v. Eastman, 3 Met.

Board of Education of Community Consolidated School District No. 54 v. Spangler

328 Ill. App. 3d 747 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 19, 2002

See Powell v. Board of Education of City of Peoria, District 150, 189 Ill. … Hall v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago, 227 Ill. App. 3d 560, 574 , 592 N.E.2d 245 (1992). Dismissal proceedings before the hearing officer are de novo. Board of Education of the City of Chicago v.

Brown v. Brown

12 S.D. 506 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1900

Gregory v. Gregory, 102 Cal. 50 , 36 Pac. 364 ; Sole Co. v. Garretson, (Sup.) 5 N. Y. Supp. 344 ; Frush v. City of East Portland, 6 Or. 281 ; City of Owensboro v. Weir, 95 Ky. 158 , 24 S. W. 115 . … Rogers v. Duff, 97 Cal. 66 , 31 Pac 836 . In Gregory v.

Robert Polsky v. United States

844 F.3d 170 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Dec 15, 2016

See Cushman v. … Brown v. Philip Morris Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 800 (3d Cir. 2001) (“It is well established that liability under § 1983 will not attach for actions taken under color of federal law.”).

Brown v. Brown

122 Misc. 2d 849 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1984

(Zipparo v Zipparo, 70 AD2d 616 .)

Brown v. Brown

153 A.D. 645 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 6, 1912

The learned court based its decision upon Berry v. Berry ( 130 App. Div. 53 ). … While the equitable principle, made the basis of our decision in Berry v.