Case law

Patin v. State Board of Parole

99 Or. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 25, 1989

PER CURIAM Petitioner appeals a Board of Parole order that states, in part: “DISCHARGE OF PAROLE PRIOR TO SENTENCE EXPIRATION DATE IS CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF PAROLE, FOLLOWING A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FROM … In this court, the Board concedes 1 that the sentencing court’s recommendation was not a valid restitution order and that, therefore, the Board lacked authority to order restitution. See State v.

Ward v. Oregon State Board of Nursing

266 Or. 128 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1973

Thus in Lamb v. … Reversed. ① Cf., Board, of Medical Examiners v. Mintz, 233 Or 441 , 378 P2d 945 (1963).

Price v. Oregon State Board of Parole

300 Or. 283 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1985

Petitioner appealed an order of the Oregon State Board of Parole (Board) setting his parole release date. … Branscomb v. LCDC, 297 Or 142,145 , 681 P2d 124 (1984).

Hambleton v. Board of Engineering Examiners

40 Or. App. 9 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 7, 1979

This court gives weight to the expertise of the Board in evaluating the quality of its licensees; however, there must be a rational nexus between the Board’s findings and its conclusions. McCann v. … The Board concluded that petitioner displayed incompetence and gross negligence. Incompetence in this context means the lack of fitness to perform professional functions. See Hatfield v.

Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry

325 Or. 185 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1997

Boise Cascade Corp. v. … The state argued in the Court of Appeals that the Board has primary jurisdiction over the “takings” claim under Dunn v.

Cook v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

123 Or. App. 532 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) that continues her commitment. We reverse and remand. … Hodgin v. PSRB, 113 Or App 580, 584 , 833 P2d 351 (1992).

BEISWENGER v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

337 Or. 669 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 2004

104 P.3d 601 (2004) 337 Or. 669 BEISWENGER v. PSYCHIATRIC SECURITY REVIEW BOARD No. S51446. Supreme Court of Oregon. December 21, 2004. Petition for review dismissed.

Wagy v. Board of Parole

Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 27, 2000

Filed: January 27, 2000 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STEVEN RAY WAGY, Petitioner on Review. v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent on Review. … See Quintero v. Board of Parole , 329 Or 319 , 986 P2d 575 (1999). *Judicial review from the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision. 146 Or App 388 , 934 P2d 448 (1997).

Pedro v. SAIF

313 Or. App. 34 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 2021

We agree that substantial evidence does not support the board’s finding that claimant’s L4-5 disc protrusion is part of a combined condition within the meaning of ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B), as interpreted in Brown v. … See Hopkins v.

Larson v. State Board of Parole

91 Or. App. 642 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 1988

We construe the term “the full membership of the board” to mean all voting members of the Board holding office and not disqualified from voting. … Petitioner argues, however, that in OAR 255-30-015(2), the Board has interpreted the term “the full membership of the board” to mean that five voting members of the *646 Board must at all times review the decision to set

Ashcroft v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

338 Or. 448 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 5, 2005

For reasons that this court set out at greater length in Tharp v. … Ashcroft v. PSRB, 192 Or App 467 , 86 P3d 102 (2004).

Bahrenfus v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

124 Or. App. 320 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 3, 1993

, subject to those supervisory orders of the board that are in the best interests of justice, the protection of society and the welfare of the person.” … Lovette v. PSRB, 102 Or App 548 , 795 P2d 587 , rev den 310 Or 547 (1990). PSRB based its finding that petitioner could not be adequately controlled in the community on the testimony of Russell and Schwartz.

Rios v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

176 Or. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 2001

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB), upon remand to the Board from the Supreme Court, Rios v. … cannot constitute a “mental disease or defect” for purposes of ORS 161.341(4), in that those conditions are excluded by ORS 161.295(2) 1 We reject that argument for the reasons stated in the en banc lead opinion in Hanson v.

Powell v. State Board of Pilot Commissioners

224 Or. 122 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1960

Fox et ux v. Lasley, 1957, 212 Or 80, 93 , 318 P2d 933 . The court must notice any failure of jurisdiction even though not mentioned by any of the parties. Evans v. … The statutory procedure both for action by the board and for judicial review is exclusive. P.U.C. Com. v. Portland Traction Co., 222 Or 614 , 351 P2d 344 .

Papadopoulos v. State Board of Higher Education

8 Or. App. 445 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 1972

Defendants are the State Board of Higher Education, which has administrative responsibility over Oregon State University, ORS 351.060(1), and the Board’s chancellor. … (See Runyon v. Board etc. of Cal., 26 Cal. App.2d 183, 185 [ 79 P.2d 101 ] [letters and documents in possession of parole board]; Chronicle Publishing Co. v.

Flury v. Land Use Board of Appeals

50 Or. App. 263 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 1981

Meyer v. Lord, 37 Or App 59 , 586 P2d 367 (1978).” While Meyer v. … Meeker v. Board of Commissioners, 287 Or 665, 674 , 601 P2d 804 (1979); Jurgenson v. Union County Court, 42 Or App 505, 513 , 600 P2d 1241 (1979).

Weyerhaeuser Land Co. v. Board of Equalization

85 Or. 434 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1917

As to the law, the important question involved is largely governed by Chapter 184, Laws 1913, p. 325, Section 8 of which in part directs thus upon an appeal from the action of the board of equalization: “If, upon hearing, … Co. v. Coos County, 30 Or. 308, 310 ( 47 Pac. 851 ); *444 Southern Oregon Co. v. Coos Co., 39 Or. 185 ( 64 Pac. 646 ); Elmore Packing Co. v. Tillamook County, 55 Or. 218, 222 ( 105 Pac. 898 ); Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v.

Genova v. Oregon Veterinary Medical Examining Board

282 Or. App. 234 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 2016

However, in its order, the board failed to adequately address why it rejected petitioner’s argument. See Becklin v. … Accordingly, we must reverse and remand the board’s order for further explanation of its conclusion. Cf. Cochran v.

Kim v. Brown

339 Or. App. 158 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 19, 2025

See Lee v. … Cunningham v.

Philippi v. State Board of Education

245 Or. 446 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1967

Barclay v. State Bd. of Education, 244 Or 294 , 417 P2d 986 (1966); Mohr v. State Board of Education, 236 Or 398 , 388 P2d 463 (1964); School Dist. 7 v. Weissenfluh, 236 Or 165 , 387 P2d 567 (1963); School Dist. … No. 68 v. Hoskins, 194 Or 301 , 240 P2d 949 (1952). We reverse the court below and reinstate the June 2, 1965 order of the State Board of Education. ① Now ORS 341.025.