Case law

Edmonston v. Holder

203 Okla. 189 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1948

Boiler & Welding Co. et al. v. … The holding in Hassen v.

Breeding v. Excise Board of Oklahoma County

180 Okla. 379 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 22, 1937

In Grubb v. … And in City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter Co., 155 Okla. 126 , 8 P. (2d) 2 , involving the construction of sections 12674 and 12676, O.

Lowden v. Excise Board of Texas County

185 Okla. 143 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1939

No. 49 v. Wolfe, 94 Okla. 87 , 221 P. 42 .” Section 10405 therein mentioned is the same as section 6860, above, prior to the aforesaid amendment. See, also, Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. … Excise Board, 181 Okla. 229 , 73 P.2d 173 . The question here is one pertaining entirely to ad valorem taxation and therefore of legislative concern.

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. McCulley

377 P.2d 568 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1962

In connection with the above, we are impressed with the following excerpt from Boynton v. … BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and IRWIN, J., concur in result.

State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rs

188 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1940

In Board of County Com’rs of Kay County v. … Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v. Paulter, supra; 61 C. J. 970; Northern P. R. Co. v. Raymond, 5 Dak. 356 , 40 N. W. 538 ; Central Union Trust Co. v. Willat Film Corporation, 99 N. J. Eq. 748, 133 Atl. 780 .

Board of Com'rs Garvin Co. v. Pyeatt

59 Okla. 221 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1916

This is an action brought by the defendant in error against plaintiff in error, for the recovery of certain taxes paid by numerous persons, “by mistake of law,” for a refund, for which claims had been filed with the board … Cox v. Dempster Mill & Mfg. Co., 50 Okla. 703 , 150 Pac. 465 ; Turman v. Ingram, 50 Okla. 47 , 150 Pac. 684 ; Switzer Lbr. Co. v. Brazell, 50 Okla. 329 , 150 Pac. 1064 ; Dow Coal. Co. v.

Union Oil Co. v. Board of Equalization

913 P.2d 1330 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 20, 1996

They rely solely on General Motors v. Oklahoma County Board of Equalization, 678 P.2d 233 (Okla.1983). … Tharel v. Board of County Commissioners of Creek County, 107 P.2d 542, 550 (Okla.1940).

Lowden v. Excise Board of Beckham County

172 Okla. 154 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1935

Co. v. … Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. (2d) 274 , are determinative of the question on appeal, and in said stipulation it is agreed that as to item Y of the protest, involving the general fund of school

Board of Comr's Garfield v. Phillips Univ.

193 Okla. 222 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1943

In Board of County Com’rs of Woods County v. … State v.

Board of County Commissioners of Garfield v. Porter

19 Okla. 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1907

The defendants in error pleaded the settlements with the county board as an estoppel. … Abel v. Blair, 3 Okla. 399 , 41 Pac. 342 ; Polson v. Pursell et al., 4 Okla. 93 , 46 Pac. 578 ; Horner v. Christy, 4 Okla. 553 , 46 Pac. 561 ; Segman v. Poole, 5 Okla. 677 , 49 Pac. 944 .

Whiteneck v. Board of Commissioners of Woods County

89 Okla. 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1923

This court in the case of Board of Com’rs of Pawnee county v. … In James v.

Broadwell v. Board of Com'rs of Bryan Co.

88 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1922

Parker v. Board of Com’rs of Tillman Co., 41 Okla. 723 , 139 Pac. 891 . See, also, Smith v. Board of Com’rs of Garvin County, 62 Okla. 120 , 162 Pac. 463 . … See Board of Com’rs of Atoka Co. v. Cypert, 65 Okla. 168 , 166 Pac. 195 . The plaintiff, however, sought to appeal.

Gambulos v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

416 P.2d 959 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1966

Plaintiff contends that the enactment of such order represents an attempt by Board to fix, freeze and control, directly or by delegation, the wholesale price of liquor and cites Oliver v. … control the price of alcoholic beverages at retail (Oliver v.

Alldredge v. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement Board

62 O.B.A.J. 3037 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 14, 1991

In the case of Baker v. … Baker v. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System, supra.

Branch v. Excise Board of Oklahoma County

171 Okla. 585 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1934

Co. v. Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. (2d) 274 . As to said item of protest, the judgment of the Court of Tax Review is affirmed. … Prior to the enactment of chapter 85, supra, it was held in the case of Excise Board of Pottawatomie County v.

Wade v. Board of Com'rs of Harmon County

161 Okla. 245 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 1932

The identical question here involved was before the court in the case of Robison v. Board of Com’rs of Marshall County, 151 Okla. 100 , 1 P. (2d) 660 . … State ex rel. v. Cease, 28 Okla. 271 , 114 P. 251 ; Threadgill v. Cross, 26 Okla. 403 . 109 P. 558 ; Wilds v. Williams (Mo.) 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1060, 133 S. W. 1 .

Bradbury v. Oklahoma State Board of Chiropody

490 P.2d 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1971

The license shall be renewed by the Board upon the payment of the delinquent annual renewal fee, without penalty, between July 1 and September 30 immediately following, if, and only if, the licensee first satisfies the Board … City of Shawnee v. Taylor, 191 Okl. 687 , 132 P.2d 950 , and Black v. Geissler, 58 Okl. 335 , 159 P. 1124 .

Brown v. Lovell

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 30, 2025

) v. ) Case No. … Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Upon review, the Court concludes that the requisite standard is not met in this case. Thus, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

Herd v. the United States.

13 Okla. 512 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1904

S. v. Logan, 105 Fed. 240 . … Joe Brown and Dan Brown.

City of Bethany v. Public Employees Relations Board

66 O.B.A.J. 3071 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1995

(the PERB/Board). … See, Board of Police Comm’rs v.