Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

2.22s

  • Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

    37 Mo. 298 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1866

    (Vaughn v. Scade, 30 Mo. 600 .) Accordingly, the motion in arrest should have been sustained. For this reason, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded. Judge Wagner concurs; Judge Lovelace absent.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. O'Keefe v. Brown

    361 Mo. 618 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 8, 1951

    Brown, Judge of the Circuit Court of Dade County, to prevent him from assuming jurisdiction over the person of relator, on the ground of improper venue, in the case hereinafter mentioned. … Dahlberg v. Fisse, 328 Mo. 213 , 40 S. W. 2d 606, 610 ; State ex rel. Columbia National Bank v. Davis, supra; State ex rel. St. Joseph Lead Co. v. Jones, 270 Mo. 230 , 192 S. W. 980 ; State ex rel. Stratton v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Mutual Benefit Insurance v. Brown

    80 Mo. App. 459 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 8, 1899

    Browne in his lifetime together with Jennie G: Browne who is now administratrix of his estate executed a note for $24,000 with interest to the Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Oompany. … Sec. 869; Showles v. Freeman, 81 Mo. 540 ; Farrar v. Christy, 24 Mo. 474 ; State ex rel. v. Sandusky, 46 Mo. 377 . —: redeeming land at trsutee's sale: pleading: interest. But is the action here of this nature ?

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. McIntosh

    205 Mo. 616 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 2, 1907

    Brown, St. Louis, Mo. … V.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Rhodey & Son Construction

    86 S.W.3d 177 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 2002

    Larry Brown appeals the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for workers’ compensation benefits from the Second Injury Fund.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Quercus Lumber Co.

    202 Mo. App. 573 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 1919

    [Williams v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Company, 109 Mo. 475 , 19 S. W. 29 ; Smith v. St. Louis Street R. Company, 151 *582 Mo. 391, 52 S. W. 378 ; Wabash R. Company v. McDaniels, 107 U. S. 605 .] … [Beckermann v. Kortkamp Jewelry Company, 175 Mo. App. 279 , 157 S. W. 855 ; Steffens v. Fisher, 161 Mo. App. 386 , 143 S. W. 1101 .]

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Corn Products Refining Co.

    227 Mo. App. 548 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1932

    The "wife" above referred to was one Lillian Brown who at times was housekeeper for claimant and who said that she was his wife, which Brown denied. … [Olentine v. Calloway (Okla.), 295 P. 608 ; Young *Page 557 v. Glynn (La.), 131 So. 51 ; Lumbermen's Reciprocal Assn. v. Day (Tex.), 17 S.W.2d 1043 ; Texas Employers' Ins. Assn. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    707 F. Supp. 2d 1009 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 20, 2010

    United States v. Bloomfield, 40 F.3d 910, 919 (8th Cir.1994); United States v. Linkous, 285 F.3d 716, 721 (8th Cir.2002). … Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir.1997) (citing Flieger v. Delo, 16 F.3d 878, 882-83 (8th Cir. 1994)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lewis Ex Rel. Brown v. Gilmore

    366 S.W.3d 522 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 2012

    Fidelity & Guar. v. Fidelity Nat’l Bank & Trust, Co., 232 Mo.App. 412 , 109 S.W.2d 47, 48 (1937). The purpose of the doctrine is to prevent double redress for a single wrong. Stromberg v. … See, e.g., Bailey v. McClelland, 848 S.W.2d *526 46, 48 (Mo.App.1993). This argument is without merit.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • City of St. Louis v. Brown

    155 Mo. 545 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1900

    In Hannibal Bridge Co. v. … [Douglass v. Stephens, 18 Mo. 366 ; Waters v. Brown, 44 Mo. 303 ; 1 Sutherland on Dam., 148.]

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Willens v. Personnel Board

    277 S.W.2d 665 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1955

    Thereafter, appellant filed a petition with the board requesting a review of the order of the director, as provided by Section 125, Article V, city charter. … See also Chestnut v. Kansas City, 171 Mo.App. 327 , 157 S.W. 656 ; State ex rel. Kane v. Johnson, 123 Mo. 43, 49 , 27 S.W. 399 ; Magner v. St. Louis, 179 Mo. 495 , 78 S.W. 782 ; State ex rel. Strait v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Irving-Pitt Manufacturing Co.

    316 Mo. 1023 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1927

    The petition omitting caption and signatures, reads thus: "(1) Plaintiff states that he is assignee of all of the rights and claims of Amelia Brown, C.A. Brown and Etta M. … In Wood v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • City of Billings v. Brown

    106 Mo. App. 240 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 1904

    Gwinn, mayor of the city of Billings* that Charles Brown did on the twenty-eighth of November, 1902, within the corporate limits of the city of Bilings, in Christian county, State of Missouri, deal in, retail and sell butchered … Louis v. Knox, Id. 79. The effect of the failure of the complaint to allege the fresh meat sold by the defendant was not the produce of his farm, depends largely on the wording of the ordinance on which it is founded.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Griesedieck Western Brewing Co.

    250 S.W.2d 803 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1952

    250 S.W.2d 803 (1952) BROWN v. GRIESEDIECK WESTERN BREWING CO. OF MISSOURI et al. No. 28325. St. Louis Court of Appeals, Missouri. July 1, 1952. Rehearing Denied September 5, 1952. *804 John S. … Vogt v. Lambert Pharmacal Co., Mo.App., 218 S.W.2d 788 ; Williams v. International Shoe Co., Mo.App., 213 S.W.2d 657 , 662; Lewis v. Champ Spring Co., Mo.App., 145 S.W.2d 758 ; Driemeyer v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Klein

    116 Mo. 259 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 30, 1893

    State ex rel. v. Smith, 104 Mo. 661 . … Wood on Mandamus and Prohibition, 147, 148, ■etseq.; State ex rel. v. Court of Appeals, 99 Mo. 216 ; State ex rel. v. Burckhartt, 87 Mo. 533 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Gallagher v. Brown

    57 Mo. App. 199 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1894

    Denison v. City, 90 Mo. 19 . … Denison v. City, supra.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Railway Passenger Assurance Co.

    45 Mo. 221 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1870

    It is in evidence that, when tho ticket was sold, defendant’s agent knew' that Brown was an engineer; and Miller testifies that he had no instructions not to sell to employees of the railroad till after Brown’s death. … But the main point in the case is whether the plaintiff’s intestate, Brown, was. killed by an accident which is covered by the policy.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Div. of Emp't Sec.

    577 S.W.3d 864 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 2019

    PER CURIAM: Cardell Brown appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him unemployment benefits.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Walls

    113 Mo. 42 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 19, 1892

    Woolfolk v. Tate, 25 Mo. 597 ; Cocker v. Cocker, 56 Mo. 180 ; Consaul v. Lidell, 7 Mo. 250 ; State v. Boogher, 3 Mo. App. 442 . Section 2171, Revised Statutes, 1889, quoted in the opinion in State ex rel. v. … Peake v. Redd, 14 Mo. 80 ; State ex rel. v. County Court, 51 Mo. 522 ; Danforth v. Lowe, 53 Mo. 217 ; Bloss v. Tacke, 59 Mo. 174 ; Wilson v. Berkstresser, 45 Mo. 283 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Weber Implement & Auto Co.

    357 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 10, 1947

    Precht was secretary-treasurer of the clubs and the board delegated to him the task of contacting Brown with reference to furnishing the oil and the plugs and to advise them as to the type of plugs they would need for the … Wamhoff v. Wagner Electric Corp., 354 Mo. 711 , 190 S.W.2d 915 . Even though Brown delayed his departure from the club an hour and a half he was on the direct route home when he was injured. McCoy v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.