Case law

Brown v. United States

810 F.2d 307 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 1987

810 F.2d 307 258 U.S.App.D.C. 188 Brown v. U.S. 86-5228 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. 2/12/87 D.C.D.C., 631 F.Supp. 954 1 AFFIRMED *

Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

733 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2010

Factual Background The Broadcasting Board of Governors is a federal agency responsible for the U.S. Government’s international broadcasting. See Grosdidier v. Chairman, BBG, 560 F.3d 495, 496 (D.C.Cir.2009). … Brown v. General Serv. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 821 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); see also Kizas v.

Maghan v. Board of Com'rs

141 F.2d 274 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1944

Taylor v. Taft, 24 App.D.C. 95 ; Longfellow v. Gudger, 57 App.D.C. 50 , 16 F.2d 653 ; United States ex rel. Crow v. Mitchell, 67 App.D.C. 61 , 89 F.2d 805 ; Caswell v. Morgenthau, 69 App.D.C. 15 , 98 F.2d 296 . … See Hammond v. Hull, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 301 , 131 F.2d 23 , where the cases on the subject are collected, and Levine v. Farley, 70 App.D.C. 381 , 107 F.2d 186 .

Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 2022

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Envtl.

Culler v. Physical Therapists Examining Board

228 A.2d 495 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1967

V, 1966), petitioner applied for registration as a physical therapist in the District of Columbia without examination. … school of physical therapy. *497 ' [2] Although the Board accepted as a fact that petitioner did some physical therapy work in the District of Columbia, the record supports the Board’s finding that it was only incidental

Brown v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 12, 2022

Brown v. District of Columbia, 928 F.3d at 1085 n.13; see also id. at 1078 (describing the “fundamental alteration” defense). … Brown v. District of Columbia, 928 F.3d at 1085 n.13; see also id. at 1087.

Riffin v. Surface Transportation Board

592 F.3d 195 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 2010

See Albany Engineering Corp. v. … See SEC v.

Myrtle v. Brown v. Curtin & Johnson, Inc.

221 F.2d 106 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 1955

This case raises the question whether the decision in Hitaffer v. … Brown v. Curtin & Johnson, D.C.D.C.1954, 117 F.Supp. 830 , the case at bar; O’Neil v. Shelton Bros. Trucking Co., D.C.D.C.1953, 116 F.Supp. 654 ; Ciarrocchi v. James Kane Co., D.C.D.C.1953, 116 F.Supp. 848 .

Brown v. United States Attorney

612 F. App'x 620 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 18, 2015

See, e.g., Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426 , 124 S.Ct. 2711 , 159 L.Ed.2d 513 (2004). … See, e.g., Rooney v. Secretary of the Army, 405 F.3d 1029 (D.C.Cir. 2005); cf. Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 , 114 S.Ct. 2364 , 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). Pursuant to D.C.

Haugness v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

386 A.2d 700 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 15, 1978

NEBEKER, Associate Judge: This is a petition for review of a decision of the District Unemployment Compensation Board (hereafter, the Board) finding the petitioner ineligible for unemployment benefits. … See Haugness v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., Cal.Super.Ct.

Sophia's Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

268 A.2d 799 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1970

For the facts of that case, see Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. ABC Bd. of District of Columbia, D.C.App., 268 A.2d 801 . 3 . D.C.Code 1967, § 1-1501 et seq. (Supp. Ill, 1970). 4 . Id. § 1-1510. … Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown, Inc. v. ABC Bd. of District of Columbia, supra note 2. 7 . AVe note that the Board did not consider the applications mutually exclusive as it might have. Pollack v.

Tiber Island Cooperative Homes, Inc. v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

975 A.2d 186 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 2009

Bowles v. … Economides v.

State ex rel. Brown v. Watt

668 F.2d 1290 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 6, 1981

NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 . 60 An administrative interpretation of a statute which does not effectuate the intent of Congress must fall. 61 IV. … .; McGinness v. ICC, 662 F.2d 853 (D.C.Cir., 1981); Alabama Power Co. v. Costle, 636 F.2d 323, 374-75 (D.C.Cir. 1979); cf. Odin v.

Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

733 F. Supp. 2d 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2010

Plaintiff’s Work History at BBG The Broadcasting Board of Governors is a federal agency responsible for the U.S. Government’s international broadcasting. See Grosdidier v. … Bank v.

Coakley v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

370 A.2d 1345 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1977

Shay v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 334 A.2d 175 (1975); Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516 (1973). … Lewis v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 330 A.2d 253 (1974); Johnson v.

Moore v. Capitol Guide Board

982 F. Supp. 35 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 21, 1997

The Capitol Guide Board is the only Defendant that does not join in the Motions. 2 . … See, e.g., In Re Espy, 80 F.3d 501, 505 (D.C.Cir.1996), citing Reiter v.

Coulibaly v. Merit Systems Protection Board

709 F. App'x 9 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 21, 2017

did not fall within the Board’s jurisdiction under the whistle-blower-specific path to Board review that Coulibaly had pursued. • In this Court, Coulibaly first argues that the Board should have considered the merits of … See Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 978 F.2d 679, 692 (Fed. Cir. 1992). We therefore agree with the Board’s decision on this question.

Duncan v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

384 A.2d 645 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1978

PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks review of an order of the District Unemployment Compensation Board (Board) denying her unemployment benefits on the ground that she was not “available” for work within the meaning of D.C.Code … [p]rovided, [t]hat failure to comply with this condition may be excused by the Board upon a showing of good cause for such failure. [Emphasis in original.] In Hill v.

Board of Commissioners v. Surface Transportation Board

321 F. App'x 6 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 2009

This petition for review of an order of the Surface Transportation Board was considered on the briefs and the appendix filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). … See, e.g., Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-62 , 112 S.Ct. 2130 , 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992); Platte River Whooping Crane Critical Habitat Maintenance Trust v. FERC, 962 F.2d 27 , 35 (D.C.Cir.1992).

Greenlee v. Board of Medicine

813 F. Supp. 48 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 1993

Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong, 426 U.S. 88, 102 , 96 S.Ct. 1895, 1905 , 48 L.Ed.2d 495 (1976). Even Board of Regents v. … Brown, M.D. at' 47-48. 2 . Plaintiff argues that by vacating its December 14, 1988 order and granting plaintiff's license, the Board now is collaterally estopped from defending the earlier denial.