Case law

Wisotsky v. State Board

62 Or. App. 393 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 1983

PER CURIAM Each petitioner, acting pro se, has filed a motion for appointment of counsel from outside the office of the Public Defender in proceedings to review final orders of the Board of Parole. ORS 144.335. … Greenholtz v. Nebraska Penal Inmates, 442 US 1 , 99 S Ct 2100 , 60 L Ed 2d 668 (1979). We find none under the Oregon Constitution. Petitioners’ only right to representation is that granted by ORS 144.337.

Jefferson County School District No. 509-J v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board

311 Or. 389 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 30, 1991

Thus, “so long as the facts justify the grounds cited for dismissal, [FDAB] may engage in only deferential review of the school board’s judgment concerning the dismissal sanction.” Ross v. … No. 509-J v.

Menges v. Board of County Commissioners

44 Or. App. 603 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1980

For the latter proposition, the city relies on our decisions in West v. City of Astoria, 18 Or App 212 , 524 P2d 1216 (1974), and Tierney v. Duris, Pay Less Properties, 21 Or App 613 , 536 P2d 435 (1975). … While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court held in Neuberger v.

Zimmerman v. Builders Board

48 Or. App. 236 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 22, 1980

PER CURIAM Petitioner, a builder, seeks review of an order by the Builders Board that he pay claimant $3,500 as damages for breach of a construction contract. … Midwest Fabrication v. Woodex, Inc., 40 Or App 675 , 596 P2d 581 , rev den (1979). Reversed.

Hawkins v. Board of Medical Examiners

23 Or. App. 320 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 10, 1975

Under the provisions of ORS ch 677, as it existed prior to the effective date of the 1975 additions, in order for the Board to discipline a licensee for incapacity, it was necessary for the Board to reach that conclusion … Newspaper Pub. v.

Lee v. Appraiser Certification & Licensure Board

160 Or. App. 622 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 19, 1999

Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 322 Or 132, 134 , 903 P2d 351 (1995). The Board’s undisputed findings of fact are as follows: 4 “[Petitioner] is a licensed appraiser in Montana. … Motor Trucking Co. v. Bur. of Labor, 64 Or App 361, 368 , 668 P2d 446 , rev den 295 Or 773 (1983). For the foregoing reasons, the Board’s final order on reconsideration is affirmed.

Hinkley v. Eugene Water & Electric Board

189 Or. App. 181 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 13, 2003

Patterson v. Wasner, 128 Or App 254, 256 , 875 P2d 506 (1994); Johnson v. … See also Reynolds v.

State v. Brown

350 Or. App. 529 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 10, 2026

Affirmed. 530 State v. Brown KAMINS, J. … Brown that he had pills in the container. See State v.

Hardt v. Board of Naturopathic Examiners

44 Or. App. 679 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 1980

Nor is there reference to the rofessional knowledge of the Board as permitted by )RS 183.450(4). Cf. Gregg v. Racing Comm’n, 38 Or App 19 , 588 P2d 1290 (1979). The finding is therefore msupported and invalid. … Petitioner’s contention anticipated the ruling of the Supreme Court in Megdal v.

Lovette v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

102 Or. App. 548 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 25, 1990

ORS 183.442(8)(c); Garcia v. Boise Cascade, 309 Or 292, 295 , 787 P2d 884 (1990); Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 206 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). … OAR 859-70-010(2) provides: “If the Board finds the person could be controlled in the community but no *551 conditional release plan has been approved by the Board, the Board may order the person committed but find the person

Merrick v. Board of Higher Education

116 Or. App. 258 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1992

See State v. … In Planned Parenthood Assn. v.

Murray v. Public Employees Retirement Board

235 Or. App. 262 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 12, 2010

Strunk v. PERB, 338 Or 145, 157 , 108 P3d 1058 (2005). … Our task here, on review of the board’s interpretation of the PERS statutes at issue, is to discern the legislature’s intent, looking primarily to the text of the statutes in context. State v.

Jarvis v. State Board of Parole

96 Or. App. 322 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 3, 1989

That rule grants discretion to the Board, which we are not authorized to reexamine. See Evensizer v. Board of Parole, 301 Or 403, 406 , 723 P2d 318 (1986). … Finally, petitioner asserts that the Board failed to give adequate reasons for its decision not to treat his consecutive sentences as concurrent. That argument lacks merit. *326 See Anderson v.

McHone v. Rosen Brown Direct, Inc.

174 Or. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 2, 2001

Rash v. McKinstry, 331 Or 665 , 20 P3d 197 (2001).

Lauderdale v. Eugene Water & Electric Board

217 Or. App. 551 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 30, 2008

Williams v. Leatham, 55 Or App 204, 207, 637 P2d 1296 (1981) (quoting Schlatter v. Willson, 270 Or 685, 688 , 528 P2d 1349 (1974), and White v. Bello, 276 Or 931, 933 , 556 P2d 1362 (1976)). … Thereafter, the board sent employees information about the new plan; those summaries promised a “fixed” contribution for retiree’s dependent coverage, and they did not mention the board resolution purporting to reserve the

Matteson v. State Board of Parole

63 Or. App. 418 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 8, 1983

In the prior case, we noted that the Board had not had the opportunity to review State v. … Matteson v. Board of Parole, 52 Or App 737, 740 , 629 P2d 1317 (1981).

Aronson v. Public Employees Retirement Board

236 Or. App. 17 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 23, 2010

See generally Tharp v. … Former ORS 237.271; see also Strunk v.

Loomis v. Board of Psychologist Examiners

152 Or. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 1998

The Board was concerned that *472 petitioner did not fully inform the court, either in her affidavit or in her testimony, of her bias or motivation in preparing the affidavit. Relying on Megdal v. … Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., 309 Or 292, 296 , 787 P2d 884 (1990); Shakerin v. MVD, 101 Or App 357, 360 , 790 P2d 1180 (1990).

Brown v. Far West Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

66 Or. App. 387 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 11, 1984

Inside plaintiffs brown paper sack, police found a can of pop. Plaintiff subsequently filed this lawsuit. … In Delp v.

Dulcich, Inc. v. Mayer Brown, LLP

954 F. Supp. 2d 1129 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 18, 2013

Within a month, on July 18, 2012, Mayer Brown filed a complaint in the Superior Court in the District of Columbia, alleging breach of contract. Mayer Brown LLP v. … Corp. v.