Case law

Findley v. State Election Board of Oklahoma

325 P.2d 1037 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1958

The cases of Meyer v. Jones, 203 Okl. 160 , 219 P.2d 620 and Martin v. … The writ of mandamus is hereby granted requiring the State Election Board to place the name of Max Findley upon the Democratic primary ballot to be held July 1, 1958. CORN, V. C.

Robbins v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

461 P.2d 610 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1969

The decision in Trask v. Johnson, Okl., 452 P.2d 575 , is dispositive of this issue. … Dunlap v. Jeffrey, Okl., 260 P.2d 1072 . Appellants further contend requirements of 75 O.S.Supp.1963 §§ 309 and 320, were not complied with as respects the contents of the record on appeal.

Standridge v. Board of Review

788 P.2d 969 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 1, 1989

Plaintiff appealed from the denial to the Board of Review, which affirmed the denial and adopted the findings of the hearing officer. … See, e.g., Vester v. Board of Review, 697 P.2d 533 (Okla.1985). Accordingly, the order is reversed and the case remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion. BACON, J., concurs. RAPP, J., not participating.

Board of County Com'rs v. Good Twp.

188 Okla. 151 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1940

Herndon v. Board of Com’rs, etc., 158 Okla. 14 , 11 P. 2d 939 . … This, we say, accords with the holding of this court in Foote v.

Shelton v. School Board, Dist. No. 22

43 Okla. 239 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 18, 1914

As was held by this court, in Martin v. McGarr, 27 Okla. 653 , 117 Pac. 323 , 38 L. R. A. (N. … See, also, Ledbetter v. Kimsey, 38 Okla. 671 , 134 Pac. 868 , and Snyder v. Blake, 35 Okla. 294, 129 Pac. 34 .

James v. Board of Com'rs, McCurtain County

103 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1924

On April 6, 1923, it appears that the board of county commissioners authorized the employment of the plaintiff as deputy county treasurer, who testified that he was directed by a member of the board to file his claim for … Dunlap v. Board of County Commissioners, Carter County, 85 Okla. 295 , 205 Pac. 1100 ; City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil and Gas Co., 64 Okla. 214 , 166 Pac. 1058 .

Kay County, Excise Board v. Davis

187 Okla. 494 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1940

WELCH, V. C. J. In the annual estimate of Kaw City the county excise board inserted and added an item of $1,000 for audit of the books, records, and accounts of Kaw City. … Plaintiff in error does cite City of Ardmore v.

LEO v. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD

2023 OK 96 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 2023

LEO v. … The Board members heard argument from each party at the Board meeting prior to the vote.

Richardson v. Pardon & Parole Board

435 P.2d 621 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1967

Harrell v. County Election Board

203 Okla. 360 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 4, 1950

He deposited $250 in cash with the board for the purpose of defraying the expense of the recount. … Coe v. State Election Board et al., 203 Okla. 356 , 221 P. 2d 774 , and for the reasons therein stated, was and is sufficient to entitle said petitioner to a recount as prayed for. Writ granted.

Smilie v. Taft Stadium Board of Control

201 Okla. 303 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1949

In the case of Warren Co. v. … In the case of Morris v.

Davis v. State Board of Medical Examiners

181 Okla. 385 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1937

In Freeman v. State Board of Examiners, 54 Okla. 531 , 154 P. 56 , we considered a proceeding originating before the same board to revoke the license of a pr'aetic-ing physician. … In Oliver v. State, 122 Okla. 66 , 251 P. 31 , a similar proceeding before the same board was involved. The accused physician there desired a review of the hoard’s decision. .

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Seely

621 P.2d 534 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1980

This Court does not disagree with the Board’s first broad contention that conducting a liquor-related business is a privilege granted by the State. In Brown Distributing Co. v. … State v. Parham, 412 P.2d 142, 147 (Okl.1966).

Carter County Excise Board v. Kurn

191 Okla. 9 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1942

“It is the further contention of the County Excise Board of Carter County, Oklahoma, that it was the duty of said board under the law to transfer said surplus to the ‘County Highway Cash Fund’ during the fiscal year 1940- … CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., absent.

Bell v. Board of County Commissioners

335 P.2d 633 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1959

We still think that the rule is sound that is laid down in Board of Directors of School Dist. No. 27 of Oklahoma County v. … Board of Excise of Oklahoma County, *636 31 Okl. 553 , 122 P. 520 and Excise Board of Tulsa County v. City of Tulsa, 180 Okl. 248 , 68 P.2d 823 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. DAVISON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V.

Stubbs v. Excise Board of Muskogee County

173 Okla. 341 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1935

Collet v. Allison, 1 Okla. 42 , 25 P. 516 ; Rider v. Brown, 1 Okla. 244 , 32 P. 341 ; Davis v. Caruthers, 22 Okla. 323 , 97 P. 581 ; Thompson v. State ex rel. Cooksey, 25 Okla. 741 , 108 P. 398 ; Jones v. … State v. Couch, 31 Okla. 206 , 120 P. 915 ; City of Guthrie v. Stewart, 45 Okla. 603 , 146 P. 585 ; Cotton v. Harris, 108 Okla. 203 , 235 P. 607 ; Herndon v. Excise Board of Garfield County, 147 Okla. 126 , 295 P. 223 .

Stockton v. Excise Board of Payne County

155 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1932

Board of Education v. Excise Board of Payne County, No. 23153, decided Jan. 26, 1932, 155 Okla. 227, 7 (2d) 473, and School Dist. No. 4, Garfield Co., v. Independent School Dist. … This question has been decided adversely to them in the case of Excise Board of Creek Co. v. State ex rel. Kissick, 105 Okla. 102 , 231 P. 862 .

Tulsa County, Excise Board v. Kurn

188 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1940

WELCH, V. C. J. This case involves the same questions this day determined in No. 29960, Tulsa County, Excise Board, v. Texas-Empire Pipe Line Company et al., 188 Okla. 128 , 106 P. 2d 792 .

Kenoyer v. Board of Equal., Ottawa County

130 Okla. 3 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1928

Plaintiff in error filed his protest before the equalization board, and after his protest was denied by that body, he lodged an appeal therefrom to the district court. … The district court sustained the action of the equalization board in assessing the land, and also the sum at which it was assessed.

Toliver v. Board of Managers, Etc.

142 Okla. 187 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1930

The personal defendants constitute the board of managers of the associatiotn. … P. v.